Advertisement

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 51–66 | Cite as

Towards a constitutive account of implicit narrativity

  • Fleur JongepierEmail author
Article

Abstract

The standard reply to the critique that narrative theories of the self are either chauvinistic or trivial is to “go implicit”. Implicit narratives, it is argued, are necessary for diachronically structured self-experience (barring triviality), but do not require that such narratives should be wholly articulable life stories (barring chauvinism). In this paper I argue that the standard approach, which puts forward a phenomenological conception of implicit narratives, is ultimately unable to get out of the clutches of the dilemma. In its place, I offer an alternative approach that does avoid the dilemma, by construing implicit narrativity as an enabling condition for experiences, rather than as something that is itself present in experience. According to this constitutive account, the coherence and intelligibility of our experiences is due to the fact that they are anchored in a larger, diachronic context. This context, I argue, takes a fundamentally embodied and narrative dimension.

Keywords

Narrativity Embodiment Self-consciousness Subjectivity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Marc Slors, Jan Bransen, Sem de Maagt, the participants of the workshop ‘Narrativity, interpretation and responsibility’ and three anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper. This research was made possible by The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (research project 322-20-003).

References

  1. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, J. (1995). Past, Space, and Self. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cassam, Q. (1999). Self and World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christman, J. (2004). Narrative Unity as a Condition of Personhood. Metaphilosophy, 35(5), 695–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dainton, B. (2008). The Phenomenal Self. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davenport, J. J. (2012). Narrative Identity, Autonomy, and Mortality: From Frankfurt and MacIntyre to Kierkegaard. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Dennett, D. C. (1986). Julian Jaynes’ Software Archaeology. Canadian Psychology, 27, 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans, G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  9. Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hutto, D. D. (2004). The Limits of Spectatorial Folk Psychology. Mind & Language, 16(5), 548–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hutto, D. D. (2008). Folk Psychological Narratives: The Sociocultural Basis of Understanding Reasons. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jaynes, J. (1976). The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. New York: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  13. Kant, I. (1781) 1999. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Guyer P. and Wood A. W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Korsgaard, C. M. (2009). Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lamarque, P. (2004). On Not Expecting Too Much from Narrative. Mind & Language, 19(4), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lamarque, P. (2007). On the Distance between Literary Narratives and Real-Life Narratives. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 60, 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lippitt, J. (2007). Getting the Story Straight: Kierkegaard, MacIntyre and Some Problems with Narrative. Inquiry, 50(1), 34–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Locke, J. (1690) 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Nidditch P. H. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  20. Mackenzie, C. (2009). Personal Identitity, Narrative Integration and Embodiment. In Embodiment and Agency, edited by Campbell S and Meynell L. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mackenzie, C. (2014). Embodied Agents, Narrative Selves. Philosophical Explorations 17 (2). doi: 10.1080/13869795.2014.886363.
  22. Mackenzie, C., & Poltera, J. (2010). Narrative Integration, Fragmented Selves, and Autonomy. Hypatia, 25(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. McDowell, J. (1997). Reductionism and the First-Person. In Reading Parfit, edited by Dancy J. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Menary, R. (2008). Embodied Narratives. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15(6), 63–84.Google Scholar
  26. Metzinger, T. (2004). Being No One: The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Meyers, D. T. (2014). Corporeal Selfhood, Self-Interpretation, and Narrative Selfhood. Philosophical Explorations 17 (2). doi: 10.1080/13869795.2013.856933.
  28. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  29. Pettit, P., & McDowell, J. (1986). Subject, Thought, and Context. New York: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  30. Plantikow, T. (2008). Surviving Personal Identity Theory: Recovering Interpretability. Hypatia, 23(4), 90–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rudd, A. (2012). Self, Value, and Narrative: A Kierkegaardian Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saks, E. (2007). The Centre Cannot Hold: A Memoir of My Schizophrenia. London: Virago Books.Google Scholar
  33. Schechtman, M. (1990). Personhood and Personal Identity. The Journal of Philosophy, 87(2), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schechtman, M. (1996). The Constitution of Selves. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schechtman, M. (2007). Stories, Lives, and Basic Survival: A Refinement and Defense of the Narrative View. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 60, 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shoemaker, S. (1970). Persons and Their Pasts. American Philosophical Quarterly, 7, 269–285.Google Scholar
  37. Slors, M. V. P. (2001). Personal Identity, Memory, and Circularity: An Alternative for Q-Memory. Journal of Philosophy, 98(4), 186–214.Google Scholar
  38. Slors, M. V. P., & Jongepier, F. (in press). Mineness without Minimal Selves. Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
  39. Stokes, P. (2010). What’s Missing in Episodic Self-Experience? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(1–1), 119–143.Google Scholar
  40. Strawson, G. (1999). The Self and the SESMET. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(4), 483–518.Google Scholar
  41. Strawson, G. (2004). Against Narrativity. Ratio, 17(4), 428–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Strawson, P. F. (1966). The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophical Papers I: Human Agency and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Thornton, T. (2003). Psychopathology and Two Kinds of Narrative Accounts of the Self. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 10(4), 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wollheim, R. (1986). The Thread of Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations