Skip to main content
Log in

Space is a hidden feature of movement and movement is a visible aspect of space.

Rudolf von Laban

Abstract

The present paper briefly reviews recent advances in spatial cognition. A central tenet in spatial cognition is that spatial information is simultaneously encoded in multiple formats. It also appears that at the level of neural processing there is no clear distinction between the representation of space and the control of action. I will argue that these findings offer novel insight into the nature of dance and choreography and that the concepts used by cognitive neuroscientists to frame their findings can be fruitfully applied in a choreographic setting. Finally, I will speculate that both dancing oneself and watching dance may enhance one’s experience of space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. References are to Das Frühlingsopfer, 1980, Nelken, Palermo, Palermo and Arien, all by Pina Bausch.

  2. Ever willing to help people find their way, I recently sent two foreign tourists on a long diversion to get to their destination. I told them to walk back out of the station, turn left, walk straight ahead, then left again, then straight ahead, when it would have been a lot easier for them to just go up the stairs to the platform and descend at the other end of the platform and then turn left. What I did was to send them on a trajectory that I remembered. I didn’t form a mental topographic layout of all paths and places in the environment so as to determine the shortest route to where they wanted to go.

  3. I am aware that this observation begs to be quantified.

  4. For different perspectives on the notion of body schema the interested reader is referred to a special issue of Neuropsychologia (2010), 48 (3), 643–830 on “The sense of the body”.

  5. These ideas were developed earlier but are contained on Forsythe (1999).

  6. Space is also one of the novel’s themes.

  7. Synchronous Objects, http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu, a project by William Forsythe in collaboration with the Ohio State University’s Advanced Computing Center for the Arts and Design, visualizes the lines, surfaces and volumes created through dance.

References

  • Aflalo, T. N., & Graziano, M. S. (2008). Four-dimensional spatial reasoning in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1066–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, R. A., & Buneo, C. A. (2002). Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 189–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbib, M. A. (1991). Interaction of multiple representations of space in the brain. In J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and space (pp. 379–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(3), 415–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N. (2006). Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(12), 551–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2002). The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. Neuron, 35(4), 625–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinali, L., Brozzoli, C., & Farnè, A. (2009). Peripersonal space and body schema: two labels for the same concept? Brain Topography, 21(3–4), 252–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doeller, C. F., Barry, C., & Burgess, N. (2010). Evidence for grid cells in a human memory network. Nature, 463(7281), 657–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, W. (1999). Improvisation technologies. A tool for the analytical dance eye. (CD-ROM). Karlsruhe: Center for Art and Mediatechnology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, M. S., & Gross, C. G. (1998). Spatial maps for the control of movement. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8(2), 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, M. S., & Cooke, D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44(6), 845–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafting, T., Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Moser, M.-B., & Moser, E. I. (2005). Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature, 436, 801–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagendoorn, I. G. (2003). Cognitive dance improvisation. How study of the motor system can inspire dance (and vice versa). Leonardo, 36(3), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husain, M., & Nachev, P. (2006). Space and the parietal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., Kahana, M. J., Ekstrom, A. D., Mollison, M. V., & Fried, I. (2010). A sense of direction in human entorhinal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107(14), 6487–6492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition. What actions tell the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Laban, R. (1966). Choreutics. London: Macdonald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maravita, A., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2003). Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach. Current Biology, 13, R531–R539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, B. L., Battaglia, F. P., Jensen, O., Moser, E. I., & Moser, M. B. (2006). Path integration and the neural basis of the ‘cognitive map’. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(8), 663–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. (1993). The birth to presence. Transl. B. Holmes and others. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, J., & Dostrovsky, J. (1971). The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Research, 34, 171–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paillard, J. (1991). Motor and representational framing of space. In J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and space (pp. 163–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, B., Nelson, M. J., & Andersen, R. A. (2006). Dorsal premotor neurons encode the relative position of the hand, eye, and goal during reach planning. Neuron, 51(1), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taube, J. S. (1998). Head direction cells and the neurophysiological basis for a sense of direction. Progress in Neurobiology, 55, 225–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivar Hagendoorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hagendoorn, I. Inscribing the body, exscribing space. Phenom Cogn Sci 11, 69–78 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9238-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9238-7

Keywords

Navigation