Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 95–112 | Cite as

A qualitative analysis of sensory phenomena induced by perceptual deprivation

  • Donna M. Lloyd
  • Elizabeth Lewis
  • Jacob Payne
  • Lindsay Wilson
Article

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that misperceptions and illusory experiences can occur if sensory stimulation is withdrawn or becomes invariant even for short periods of time. Using a perceptual deprivation paradigm, we created a monotonous audiovisual environment and asked participants to verbally report any auditory, visual or body-related phenomena they experienced. The data (analysed using a variant of interpretative phenomenological analysis) revealed two main themes: (1) reported sensory phenomena have different spatial characteristics ranging from simple percepts to the feeling of immersion in a complex multisensory environment and (2) the active contribution of the perceiver where participants report engaging in exploratory processes even when there is nothing to find. Detailed analysis of the qualitative data further showed that participants who reported more perceptual phenomena were more likely to report internal bodily sensations, move more during the experiment and score higher on the Revised Hallucination Scale than those reporting fewer percepts explicitly linking perceptual deprivation to somatic phenomena. The results demonstrate how the variety of sensory experiences induced by perceptual deprivation can give further insight into the factors mediating conscious awareness and may suggest ways in which the brain imposes meaning on the environment under invariant sensory conditions.

Keywords

Auditory Ganzfeld Interpretative phenomenological analysis Misperception Perceptual deprivation Visual 

References

  1. Allen, P., Larøi, F., McGuire, P. K., & Aleman, A. (2008). The hallucinating brain: a review of structural and functional neuroimaging studies of hallucinations. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 32, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. R. (2006). The perceptual characteristics of voice-hallucinations in deaf people: insights into the nature of subvocal thought and sensory feedback loops. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, 701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks, J. (2001). Rorschach audio: ghost voices and perceptual creativity. Leonardo Music Journal, 11, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M., et al. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes, J., & David, A. S. (2001). Visual hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease: a review and phenomenological survey. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 70, 727–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentall, R. P., & Slade, P. D. (1985). Reality testing and auditory hallucinations: a signal detection analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bexton, W. H., Heron, W., & Scott, T. H. (1954). Effects of decreased variation in the sensory environment. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 8, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burney, C. (1952). Solitary confinement. New York: Coward-McCann.Google Scholar
  9. Downar, J., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J., & Davis, K. D. (2000). A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dyson, M. (1999). Intensive care unit psychosis, the therapeutic nurse–patient relationship and the influence of the intensive care setting: analyses of interrelating factors. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8, 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elbers, N., Geraerts, E., & van Heerden, J. (2007). Hallucinating consistency. Theory & Psychology, 17, 587–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feelgood, S. R., & Rantzen, A. J. (1994). Auditory and visual hallucinations in university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ffytche, D. H., & Howard, R. J. (1999). The perceptual consequences of visual loss: ‘positive’ pathologies of vision. Brain, 122, 1247–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fiske, D. (1961). Effects of monotonous and restricted stimulation. In D. W. Fiske & S. R. Maddi (Eds.), Functions of varied experience (pp. 106–144). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  15. Freedman, S. J., Grunebaum, H. U., & Greenblatt, M. (1961). Perceptual and cognitive changes in sensory deprivation. In P. Solomon, P. E. Kubzansky, P. H. Liederman, J. H. Mendelson, R. Trumbull, & D. Wexler (Eds.), Sensory deprivation: a symposium held at Harvard Medical School (pp. 58–71). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gallagher, S. (1997). Mutual enlightenment: recent phenomenology in cognitive science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4, 195–214.Google Scholar
  17. Haber, W. B. (1955). Reactions to loss of limb: physiological and psychological aspects. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 74, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayashi, M., & Hiroshima, U. (1992). EEG alpha activity and hallucinatory experience during sensory deprivation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 403–412.Google Scholar
  19. Heron, W. (1957). The pathology of boredom. Scientific American, 196, 52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heron, W. (1965). Cognitive and physiological effects of perceptual isolation. In P. Solomon, P. E. Kubzansky, P. H. Liederman, J. H. Mendelson, R. Trumbull, & D. Wexler (Eds.), Sensory deprivation: a symposium held at Harvard Medical School (pp. 6–33). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Heron, W., Doane, B. K., & Scott, T. H. (1956). Visual disturbances after prolonged perceptual deprivation. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 10, 13–18.Google Scholar
  22. Hunter, J. P., Katz, J., & Davis, K. D. (2005). Dissociation of phantom limb phenomena from stump tactile spatial acuity and sensory thresholds. Brain, 128, 308–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Husserl, E. (2005). Phantasy, image consciousness, and memory (1898–1925). Dordrecht: Springer. Translated by J. B. Brough.Google Scholar
  24. Jackson, C. W., Jr., Pollard, J. C., & Kansky, E. W. (1962). The application of findings from experimental sensory deprivation to cases of clinical sensory deprivation. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 243, 558–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jakes, S., & Hemsley, D. R. (1986). Individual differences in reaction to brief exposure to unpatterned visual stimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Launay, G., & Slade, P. (1981). The measurement of hallucinatory predisposition in male and female prisoners. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis, E., & Lloyd, D. M. (2010). Embodied experience: a first-person investigation of the rubber hand illusion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9, 317–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marbach, E. (1993). Mental representation and consciousness: towards a phenomenological theory of representation and reference. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  29. McClamrock, R. (1995). Existential cognition: computational minds in the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Merabet, L. B., Maguire, D., Warde, A., Alterescu, K., Stickgold, R., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2004). Visual hallucinations during prolonged blindfolding in sighted subjects. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, 24, 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Merabet, L. B., Rizzo, J. F., Amedi, A., Somers, D. C., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2005). What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprostheses. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morrison, A. P., Wells, A., & Nothard, S. (2002). Cognitive and emotional predictors of predisposition to hallucinate in non-patients. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pierre, J. M. (2010). Hallucinations in nonpsychotic disorders: toward a differential diagnosis of “hearing voices”. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18, 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pütz, P., Braeunig, M., & Wackermann, J. (2006). EEG correlates of multimodal ganzfeld induced hallucinatory imagery. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reed, G. F. (1979). Sensory deprivation. In G. Underwood & R. Stevens (Eds.), Aspects of consciousness: clinical issues. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  36. Sartre, J.-P. (2004). The imaginary: a phenomenological psychology of the imaginary. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Scott, T. H., Bexton, W. H., Heron, W., & Doane, B. K. (1959). Cognitive effects of perceptual isolation. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shultz, D. P. (1965). Sensory restriction. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  39. Slade, P. D. (1984). Sensory deprivation and clinical psychiatry. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 32, 256–260.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, J. A. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J. Smith, R. Harre, & L. V. Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, J. A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Osborn, M. (1997). Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the psychology of health and illness. In L. Yardley (Ed.), Material discourses of health and illness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Spielberger, C. D., Gorusch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  45. Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Varela, F. (1996). Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 330–349.Google Scholar
  47. Wackermann, J., Pütz, P., Büchi, S., Strauch, I., & Lehmann, D. (2002). Brain electrical activity and subjective experience during altered states of consciousness: ganzfeld and hypnagogic states. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46, 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wackermann, J., Pütz, P., & Allefeld, C. (2008). Ganzfeld-induced hallucinatory experience, its phenomenology and cerebral electrophysiology. Cortex, 44, 1364–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Young, H. F., Bentall, R. P., Slade, P. D., & Dewey, B. A. (1987). The role of brief instructions and suggestibility in the elicitation of auditory and visual hallucinations in normal and psychiatric subjects. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zubek, J. P. (1969). Sensory deprivation: fifteen years of research. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  51. Zuckerman, M. (1964). Perceptual isolation as a stress situation. A review. Archives of General Psychiatry, 11, 225–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zuckerman, M. (1969). Variables affecting deprivation results. In: J P Zubek (ed), Sensory deprivation: fifteen years of research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  53. Zuckerman, M., & Cohen, N. (1964). Sources of reports of visual and auditory sensations in perceptual-isolation experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zusne, L., & Jones, W. H. (1989). Anomalistic psychology: a study of magical thinking. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. pp. 77–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donna M. Lloyd
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Lewis
    • 1
  • Jacob Payne
    • 1
  • Lindsay Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations