Skip to main content
Log in

Managing delayed or missed pregabalin doses in patients with focal epilepsy: a Monte Carlo simulation study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Delayed or missed doses are inevitable in epilepsy pharmacotherapy. The current remedial measures recommended by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for non-adherence are generic and lack clinical evidence.

Aim

To assess remedial strategies for delayed or missed pregabalin doses in patients with epilepsy using Monte Carlo simulations.

Method

Monte Carlo simulations were performed using a published population pharmacokinetic model for pregabalin. The applicability of five proposed remedial regimens as well as FDA recommendations was evaluated by simulating various poor adherence scenarios in eight populations, including those with renal dysfunction.

Results

All proposed remedial strategies were associated with delay duration and renal function. When delays are relatively short, an immediate regular dose is advised. The cut-off time points for taking the regular dose as a remedial regimen were 1, 2, 4, and 12 h for patients with mild renal impairment and normal renal function, moderate renal impairment, severe renal impairment, and end-stage renal disease, respectively. However, when delay aligns closely with a dosing interval, a regular dose combined with a partial dose proves effective. Generally, supplementing 1.3-fold the regular dose at the next scheduled time adequately compensates for the missed dose.

Conclusion

Model-based simulations provided quantitative evidence for the effectiveness and feasibility of remedial strategies for missed or delayed pregabalin doses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chew M, Ma G, Xie R, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of pregabalin extended-release in healthy volunteers and patients with postherpetic neuralgia, fibromyalgia, and partial-onset seizures. J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;59:1527–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan PLS, Marshall SF, McFadyen L, et al. Pregabalin population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses for focal onset seizures in children (4–16 years) and adults, to support dose recommendations in children. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;110:132–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Schulze-Bonhage A. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of pregabalin and its role in the treatment of epilepsy. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2013;9:105–15. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2013.749239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fong JK, Chan EL, Leung H, et al. An update of the Hong Kong epilepsy guideline: consensus statement on the use of antiepileptic drugs in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2017;23:74–88. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj166027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Toth C. Drug safety evaluation of pregabalin. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012;11:487–502. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2012.677026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Antinew J, Pitrosky B, Knapp L, et al. Pregabalin as adjunctive treatment for focal onset seizures in pediatric patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Child Neurol. 2019;34:248–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073818821035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishida JH, McCulloch CE, Steinman MA, et al. Gabapentin and pregabalin use and association with adverse outcomes among hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29:1970–8. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2018010096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Morano A, Palleria C, Citraro R, et al. Immediate and controlled-release pregabalin for the treatment of epilepsy. Expert Rev Neurother. 2019;19:1167–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2019.1681265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kleinman NL, Sadosky A, Seid J, et al. Costs, work absence, and adherence in patients with partial onset seizures prescribed gabapentin or pregabalin. Epilepsy Res. 2012;102:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.04.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’ Rourke G, O’ Brien JJ. Identifying the barriers to antiepileptic drug adherence among adults with epilepsy. Seizure. 2017;45:160–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2016.12.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang CY, Jiao Z, Ding JJ, et al. Remedial dosing recommendations for delayed or missed doses of valproic acid in patients with epilepsy based on Monte Carlo simulations. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;111: 107265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Malek N, Heath CA, Greene J. A review of medication adherence in people with epilepsy. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135:507–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Farrukh MJ, Makmor-Bakry M, Hatah E, et al. Impact of complementary and alternative medicines on antiepileptic medication adherence among epilepsy patients. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021;21:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03224-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee YK, Ah YM, Choi YJ, et al. Antiepileptic drug adherence and persistence in children with epilepsy attending a large tertiary care children’s hospital. Epileptic Disord. 2016;18:408–17. https://doi.org/10.1684/epd.2016.0871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brodtkorb E, Samsonsen C, Sund JK, et al. Treatment non-adherence in pseudo-refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2016;122:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Albassam A, Hughes DA. What should patients do if they miss a dose? A systematic review of patient information leaflets and summaries of product characteristics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;77:251–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-03003-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brittain ST, Wheless JW. Pharmacokinetic simulations of topiramate plasma concentrations following dosing irregularities with extended-release vs. immediate-release formulations. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;52:31–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.08.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu EQ, Jiao Z, Wang CY, et al. Remedial dosing recommendations for delayed or missed doses of lamotrigine in pediatric patients with epilepsy using Monte Carlo simulations. Epilepsy Behav. 2019;96:132–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.04.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ding JJ, Zhang YJ, Jiao Z, et al. The effect of poor compliance on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine and its epoxide metabolite using Monte Carlo simulation. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2012;33:1431–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2012.135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Li ZR, Wang CY, Lin WW, et al. Handling delayed or missed dose of antiseizure medications: a model-informed individual remedial dosing. Neurology. 2023;100:e921–31. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yin YW, Liu XQ, Gu JQ, et al. How to handle a delayed or missed dose of edoxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation? A model-informed remedial strategy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023;89:2066–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. National Library of Medicine. LYRICA- pregabalin capsule. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=124176c7-d8ab-4bbe-b468-3e5d12f03e44. Accessed 15 Mar 2023

  23. Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Gu Q, et al. Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2015–2018. Vital Health Stat. 2021;3(36):1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reimers A, Berg JA, Burns ML, et al. Reference ranges for antiepileptic drugs revisited: a practical approach to establish national guidelines. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2018;12:271–80. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S154388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Editage (editage. cn) for English language editing.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuemei Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 149 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, H., Zheng, Y., Wang, C. et al. Managing delayed or missed pregabalin doses in patients with focal epilepsy: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Int J Clin Pharm 46, 150–157 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01657-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01657-y

Keywords

Navigation