Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How patient-centredness takes place in pharmacy encounters: a critical common-sense interpretation of video-recorded meetings

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Counselling patients in community pharmacies is important to obtain the best usage of medicines. However, it does not seem to be sufficiently patient-centred. To become more patient-centred, communication guidelines could be used but the guidelines need to be supplemented with up-to-date research that specifies how patient-centredness takes place or could take place in the pharmacy encounters.

Aim

To use a qualitative methodology to investigate how patient-centeredness unfolds in Danish pharmacy encounters by analysing video-recorded encounters.

Method

A maximal variation sampling strategy was applied, including staff from 2 pharmacies. A preunderstanding of ‘patient-centredness’ guided the analyses with focus on the development of relationships, understanding the patient’s situation, and coordination of care. Data were then subjected to a ‘critical common-sense’ interpretation. To validate identified themes, ‘structural corroboration’, ‘researcher triangulation’, and a ‘meaning saturation process’ were carried out.

Results

Nineteen encounters were included. Overall, the staff took responsibility for ensuring patients’ optimal medicine use and focused on biomedical aspects of the treatment. Important messages conveyed by staff appeared to be that there is one correct way of taking medicines and that taking the medicine is an uncomplicated process. Patients were rarely invited to provide their perspective.

Conclusion

Staff showed commitment to ensuring patients’ optimal medicine use, but during this process, they predominantly relied on a reductionist approach to medicine. This must be addressed as it hampers patient-centredness. Suggestions for how to become more patient-centred are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koster ES, Blom L, Overbeeke MR, et al. Quality of pharmaceutical care at the pharmacy counter: patients’ experiences versus video observation. Patient Prefer Adher. 2016;10:363–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van Geffen EC, Kruijtbosch M, Egberts AC, et al. Patients’ perceptions of information received at the start of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor treatment: implications for community pharmacy. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(4):642–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Geffen EC, Philbert D, van Boheemen C, et al. Patients’ satisfaction with information and experiences with counseling on cardiovascular medication received at the pharmacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;83(3):303–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guillaumie L, Ndayizigiye A, Beaucage C, et al. Patient perspectives on the role of community pharmacists for antidepressant treatment: a qualitative study. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2018;151(2):142–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurtz SM, Silverman JD. The Calgary–Cambridge Referenced Observation Guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes. Med Educ. 1996;30(2):83–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abdel-Tawab R, James DH, Fichtinger A, et al. Development and validation of the Medication-Related Consultation Framework (MRCF). Patient Educ Couns. 2011;83(3):451–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Da Costa DL, Corlett SA, Dodds LJ. A narrative review on the consultation tools available for pharmacists in the United Kingdom: do they facilitate person-centred care? Int J Pharm Pract. 2020;28(4):301–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenhill N, Anderson C, Avery A, et al. Analysis of pharmacist-patient communication using the Calgary–Cambridge guide. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;83(3):423–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koster ES, van Meeteren MM, van Dijk M, et al. Patient-provider interaction during medication encounters: a study in outpatient pharmacies in the Netherlands. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(7):843–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fosgerau CF, Kaae S. Furthering patient-centered counseling: Exploring new aspects around pharmacists’ experiences in pharmacy encounters through video-stimulated recall interviewing. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021;17(4):723–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng YK, Shah NM, Loong LS, et al. Patient-centred care in the context of pharmacy consultations: a qualitative study with patients and pharmacists in Malaysia. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;26(6):1638–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen HT. Developing interactional competence—a conversation-analytic study of patient consultations in pharmacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Langberg EM, Dyhr L, Davidsen AS. Development of the concept of patient-centredness—a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(7):1228–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dyche L, Epstein RM. Curiosity and medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45(7):663–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fosgerau CF, Husted GR, Clemmensen NB, et al. Using qualitative methods to explore the dynamics of patients’ perspective sharing in community pharmacy counselling–conversation analysis and video-stimulated recall interviews. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021;19(4):2582.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kvale S. En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview. 1st ed. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag; 1997 (in Danish).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guba E. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ. 1981;29(2):75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27(4):591–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raymond G. Grammar and social organization: yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. Am Sociol Rev. 2003;68(6):939–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garner M, Watson MC. Using linguistic analysis to explore medicine counter assistants’ communication during consultations for nonprescription medicines. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(1):51–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahn AC, Tewari M, Poon CS, et al. The limits of reductionism in medicine: could systems biology offer an alternative? PLoS Med. 2006;3(6):e208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Saunders J. The practice of clinical medicine as an art and as a science. Med Humanit. 2000;26(1):18–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process.Joint Commission of Pharmacy Practitioners 2014. https://jcpp.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/PatientCareProcess-with-supporting-organizations.pdf. Accessed 28 Sep 2022.

  24. Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990;47(3):533–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rogers CR. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2007;44(3):240–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hower EG. Beyond shared decision making. J Clin Ethics. 2020;31(4):293–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received DKK 128,600 from the Danish Pharmaceutical Association to conduct the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Kaae.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaae, S., Rossing, C., Husted, G.R. et al. How patient-centredness takes place in pharmacy encounters: a critical common-sense interpretation of video-recorded meetings. Int J Clin Pharm 45, 146–153 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01508-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01508-2

Keywords

Navigation