Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A randomised trial of pharmacist-led discharge prescribing in an Australian geriatric evaluation and management service

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Prescribing discharge medications is a potential “next step” for pharmacists in Australian hospitals, however, safety must be demonstrated via a randomised controlled study. Objective To determine if a collaborative, pharmacist led discharge prescribing model results in less patients with medication errors than conventional prescribing for both handwritten and digital prescriptions. Setting Geriatric Medical ward in a quaternary hospital, Australia Methods A prospective, single-blinded randomised controlled study of patients randomised to conventional (control) or a pharmacist-led prescribing (intervention) arms at discharge from hospital. This study had 2 phases; (1) handwritten prescribing and (2) digital prescribing. In addition, the two prescribing methods were compared. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with a medication error on their discharge prescription. Results In phase 1, 45 patients were recruited; 21 (control) and 24 (intervention). 95% of control patients and 29% in the intervention arm had at least one medication error, p < 0.0002, relative risk (RR) 0.31, confidence interval (CI) 0.16—0.58. The number of items with at least 1 error reduced from 69 to 4%; p < 0.0001, RR 0.06, CI 0.03—0.11 and fewer items had at least 1 clinically significant error (11% vs 2%, p = 0.0004, RR 0.15, CI 0.04—0.30). In phase 2, 39 patients were recruited; 18 (control) and 21 (intervention). 100% of control patients and 62% in the intervention arm had at least one medication error (p = 0.005, RR 0.62, CI 0.44—0.87). Items with at least 1 error decreased from 21 to 7% (p < 0.0001, RR 0.34, CI 0.44—0.56), there were fewer items with at least 1 clinically significant error (13% vs 5%, p < 0.003, RR 0.4, CI 0.22—0.72). There was no significant change in the primary outcome between handwritten and digital (60% vs 79%, p < 0.055). Conclusion In a geriatric setting, pharmacist-led partnered discharge prescribing results in significantly less patients with medication errors than the conventional method for both handwritten and digital methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Onatade R, Sawieres S, Veck A, Smith L, Gore S, Al-Azeib S. The incidence and severity of errors in pharmacist-written discharge medication orders. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39:722–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Latter S, Smith A, Blenkinsopp A, Nicholls P, Little P, Chapman S. Are nurse and pharmacist independent prescribers making clinically appropriate prescribing decisions? An analysis of consultations. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012;17:149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nissen L, Kyle G. Non-medical prescribing in Australia. Aust Prescr. 2010;33:166–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tong EY, Mitra B, Yip G, Galbraith K, Dooley MJ, PPMC Research Group. Multi-site evaluation of partnered pharmacist medication charting and in-hospital length of stay. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86:285–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tong EY, Roman CP, Mitra B, Yip GS, Gibbs H, Newnham HH, et al. Reducing medication errors in hospital discharge summaries: a randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust. 2017;206:36–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crotty M, Rowett D, Spurling L, Giles LC, Phillips PA. Does the addition of a pharmacist transition coordinator improve evidence-based medication management and health outcomes in older adults moving from the hospital to a long-term care facility? Results of a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2004;2:257–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenhower C. Impact of pharmacist-conducted medication reconciliation at discharge on readmissions of elderly patients with COPD. Ann Pharmacother. 2014;48:203–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farley TM, Shelsky C, Powell S, Farris KB, Carter BL. Effect of clinical pharmacist intervention on medication discrepancies following hospital discharge. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36:430–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Oliveira GS, Castro-Alves LJ, Kendall MC, McCarthy R. Effectiveness of pharmacist intervention to reduce medication errors and health-care resources utilization after transitions of care: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Patient Saf. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Torisson G, Minthon SL, Londos E. Multidisciplinary intervention reducing readmissions in medical inpatients: a prospective, non-randomized study. Clin Interv Aging. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S49133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawoud DM, Smyth M, Ashe J, Strong T, Wonderling D, Hill J, et al. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of pharmacist input at the ward level: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2019;15:1212–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nuckols TK, Smith-Spangler C, Morton SC, Asch SM, Patel VM, Anderson LJ, et al. The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2014;3:56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baysari MT, Raban MZ. The safety of computerised prescribing in hospitals. Aust Prescr. 2019;42:136–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alshahrani F, Marriott J, Cox A. The impact of electronic prescribing systems on the incidence of prescribing errors within in-patients settings: a systematic review. Int J Pharm Pract. 2015;23:23–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shah K, Chen L-C, Gray T, Knaggs R. The impact of an electronic prescribing system on pharmacy interventions and contribution to patient safety. Int J Pharm Pract. 2015;23:23–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sethuraman U, Kannikeswaran N, Murray KP, Zidan MA, Chamberlain JM. Prescription errors before and after introduction of electronic medication alert system in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22:714–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. The High5s Project—standard operating protocol for medication reconciliation [Internet]. World health organization; 2014 [cited 2019 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.who.int/patientsafety/implementation/solutions/high5s/h5s-sop.pdf?ua=1.

  18. Fitzgibbon M, Lorenz R, Lach H. Medication reconciliation: reducing risk for medication misadventure during transition from hospital to assisted living. J Gerontol Nurs. 2013;39:22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keers RN, Williams SD, Vattakatuchery JJ, Brown P, Miller J, Prescott L, et al. Medication safety at the interface: evaluating risks associated with discharge prescriptions from mental health hospitals. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015;40:645–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Braund R, Coulter CV, Bodington AJ, Giles LM, Greig A-M, Heaslip LJ, et al. Drug related problems identified by community pharmacists on hospital discharge prescriptions in New Zealand. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36:498–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Roughead EE, Semple SJ, Rosenfeld E. The extent of medication errors and adverse drug reactions throughout the patient journey in acute care in Australia. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2016;14:113–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmad A, Mast R, Nijpels G, Elders P, Dekker J, Hugtenburg J. Identification of drug-related problems of elderly patients discharged from hospital. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;2014:155–65.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Routledge PA, O’Mahony MS, Woodhouse KW. Adverse drug reactions in elderly patients: adverse drug reactions in elderly patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;57:121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gamble J-M, Hall J, Marrie T, Sadowski C, Majumdar S, Eurich D. Medication transitions and polypharmacy in older adults following acute care. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014;2014:189–96.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jensen LD, Andersen O, Hallin M, Petersen J. Potentially inappropriate medication related to weakness in older acute medical patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36:570–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Rosenberg L, Anderson TE, Mitchell AA. Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the United States: the slone survey. JAMA. 2002;287:337–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gnjidic D, Hilmer SN, Blyth FM, Naganathan V, Waite L, Seibel MJ, et al. Polypharmacy cutoff and outcomes: five or more medicines were used to identify community-dwelling older men at risk of different adverse outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:989–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mansur N, Weiss A, Beloosesky Y. Looking beyond polypharmacy: quantification of medication regimen complexity in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012;10:223–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sergi G, De Rui M, Sarti S, Manzato E. Polypharmacy in the elderly: can comprehensive geriatric assessment reduce inappropriate medication use? Drugs Aging. 2011;28:509–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. RACGP position on independent non medical practitioner prescribing—a statement of principles [Internet]. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; 2009 [cited 2019 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.racgp.org.au/download/documents/Policies/Health%20systems/non_medical_prescribing.pdf.

  31. Pharmacist prescribing—Position statement [Internet]. Pharmacy Board of Australia; 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 18]. Available from: https://www.pharmacyboard.gov.au/News/Professional-Practice-Issues/Pharmacist-Prescribing-Position-Statement.aspx.

  32. Discussion paper—Public and stakeholder feedback on pharmacist prescribing [Internet]. Pharmacy Board of Australia; 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.pharmacyboard.gov.au/News/Past-Consultations.aspx.

  33. Wong JD, Bajcar JM, Wong GG, Alibhai SM, Huh J-H, Cesta A, et al. Medication reconciliation at hospital discharge: evaluating discrepancies. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:1373–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) | Home [Internet]. Department of Health, Australian government; [cited 2020 Apr 23]. Available from: https://www.pbs.gov.au/pbs/home;jsessionid=btc3tbj1lbtz120yv8k4f66vf.

  35. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2016), Recommendations for terminology, abbreviations and symbols used in medicines documentation. [Internet]. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; [cited 2020 Apr 23]. Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Recommendations-for-terminology-abbreviations-and-symbols-used-in-medicines-December-2016.pdf.

  36. Health (Drugs and Poisons) Regulation 1996 [Internet]. Department of Health, Queensland; 2017 [cited 2020 Apr 23]. Available from: https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/2017-10-01/sl-1996-0414.

  37. APINCHS classification of high risk medicines | Australian commission on safety and quality in health care [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jan 5]. Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/medication-safety/high-risk-medicines/apinchs-classification-high-risk-medicines#apinchs-safety-improvement-list.

  38. Tran T, Taylor SE, Hardidge A, Mitri E, Aminian P, George J, et al. Pharmacist-assisted electronic prescribing at the time of admission to an inpatient orthopaedic unit and its impact on medication errors: a pre- and postintervention study. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019;10:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Elliott RA, Tan Y, Chan V, Richardson B, Tanner F, Dorevitch MI. Pharmacist-physician collaboration to improve the accuracy of medication information in electronic medical discharge summaries: effectiveness and sustainability. Pharmacy. 2019;8:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Roughead L, Semple S, Rosenfeld E. Literature review: medication safety in Australia [Internet]. australian commission on safety and quality in health care; 2013 [cited 2020 May 11]. Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Literature-Review-Medication-Safety-in-Australia-2013.pdf.

  41. Westbrook JI, Reckmann M, Li L, Runciman WB, Burke R, Lo C, et al. effects of two commercial electronic prescribing systems on prescribing error rates in hospital in-patients: a before and after study. PLoS Med. 2012;9:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schwartzberg D, Ivanovic S, Patel S, Burjonrappa SC. We thought we would be perfect: medication errors before and after the initiation of computerized physician order entry. J Surg Res. 2015;198:108–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rodgers R. Evaluation of prescription dosage instructions for solid oral dosage medicines contained on english electronic prescriptions. Int J Pharm Pract. 2015;23:23–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the following people: Staff of GEMs- Including Dr Alison Cutler, Dr Elizabeth Waldie, Ms Michelle Fuller, Ms Cindy Richards, Ms Kirra Farrar Staff of the Royal Brisbane Hospital Pharmacy- Including Associate Professor Ian Coombes, Associate Professor Danielle Stowasser, Dr Andrew Hale, Mr Cameron Tessier.

Funding

Grants Allied Health Professions’ Office of Queensland (AHPOQ): Allied Health Professional Prescribing Training Health Practitioner Research Scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

    Shannon Finn, Peter Donovan & Shanthi Kanagarajah

  2. Brisbane, Australia

    Emily D’arcy

  3. Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

    Michael Barras

Authors
  1. Shannon Finn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emily D’arcy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Donovan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shanthi Kanagarajah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Barras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shannon Finn.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

No author has a conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Finn, S., D’arcy, E., Donovan, P. et al. A randomised trial of pharmacist-led discharge prescribing in an Australian geriatric evaluation and management service. Int J Clin Pharm 43, 847–857 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01184-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01184-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation