Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of an instrument to measure adherence to type 2 diabetes management

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Adherence to type 2 diabetes management is defined as the extent to which the behaviour of a person matches the one recommended by health care professionals. Control of this disease depends on adherence to diabetes management, which includes monitoring blood glucose levels, adopting a healthy diet, exercising, taking medication, quitting smoking, and undergoing psychosocial care and periodic check-ups. This can also prevent health complications and reduce medical costs. Objective The objective of this study is to validate a culturally appropriate instrument directed towards the Mexican population that measures a patient’s level of adherence to their type 2 diabetes mellitus management. Method The study design was cross-sectional. The instrument was applied individually (face to face researcher-assisted survey) by a member of the team. The study sample included 200 participants, which were attended at an outpatient clinic. To evaluate the psychometric validity of the scale we calculated response frequencies, the discrimination of items for extreme groups, the validity, and the internal reliability. The scale of adherence for complete management in patients with type 2 diabetes includes disease monitoring, complication prevention, and social support using questions and answers based on the Likert scale, corresponding to the 5 stages of the transtheoretical model. Main outcome measure The validity and internal reliability of the instrument to measure adherence to type 2 diabetes management, which proved to be justifiable and reliable with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.92 and a total explained variance of 65.03%. Results The instrument was composed of 29 items and 6 factors: adherence to medical Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92 and dietary treatment Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88, change in dietary habits Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89, adherence to physical activity and exercise Cronbach’s alpha = 0.84, social support Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79, and prevention of complications Cronbach’s alpha = 0.70. The instrument obtained a content validity index (I-CVI) of 0.9. Conclusion The proposed instrument, which includes factors that measure adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus patient’s management, using the transtheoretical model of behaviour change to simultaneously identify patient motivation to change their lifestyle, is valid and reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Villalpando S, De la Cruz-Góngora V, Rojas R, Shamah-Levy T, Ávila MA, Gaona B, et al. Prevalence and distribution of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Mexican adult population. A probabilistic survey. Salud Pública de México. 2010;52(1):S19–S26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hernández-Ávila M, Gutiérrez JP, Reynoso-Noverón N. Diabetes mellitus en México. El estado de la epidemia. Salud Pública de México. 2013;55(2):S129–S136136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Basto-Abreu A, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Rojas-Martínez R, Aguilar-Salinas C, López-Olmedo N, De la Cruz-Góngora V, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and poor glycemic control in Mexico: results from Ensanut 2016. Salud Pública de México. 2020;62(1):50–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. American Diabetes Association. 4. Lifestyle Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(1):S38–50.

  5. Alsunni AA, Albaker WI, Badar A. Determinants of misconceptions about diabetes among Saudi diabetic patients attending diabetes clinic at a tertiary care hospital in Eastern Saudi Arabia. J Family Community Med. 2014;93(2):93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peyrot M, Perez-Nieves M, Ivanova J, Cao D, Schmerold L, Kalirai S, et al. Correlates of basal insulin persistence among insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes: results from a multinational survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(10):1843–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathew R, Gucciardi E, De Melo M, Barata P. Self-management experiences among men and women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a qualitative analysis. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13(1):122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christie C. Proposed dietary guidelines 2015 and implications for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015;30(5):375–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Latham CL, Calvillo E. Predictors of diabetes outcomes in Mexico. J Transcult Nurs. 2013;24(3):271–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shabibi P, Zavareh MSA, Sayehmiri K, Qorbani M, Safari O, Rastegarimehr B, et al. Effect of educational intervention based on the Health Belief Model on promoting self-care behaviors of type-2 diabetes patients. Electron Phys. 2017;9(12):5960–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abubakari A-R, Jones MC, Lauder W, Kirk A, Anderson J, Devendra D. Associations between knowledge, illness perceptions, self-management and metabolic control of type 2 diabetes among African and European-origin patients. J Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn. 2011;3(3):245–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones H, Edwards L, Vallis TM, Ruggiero L, Rossi SR, Rossi JS, et al. Changes in diabetes self-care behaviors make a difference in glycemic control: the Diabetes Stages of Change (DiSC) study. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):732–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vallis M, Ruggiero L, Greene G, Jones H, Zinman B, Rossi S, et al. Stages of change for healthy eating in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1468–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abubakari AR, Jones MC, Lauder W, Kirk A, Anderson J, Devendra D, et al. Ethnic differences and socio-demographic predictors of illness perceptions, self-management, and metabolic control of type 2 diabetes. Int J Gen Med. 2013;6:617–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abubakari AR, Cousins R, Thomas C, Sharma D, Naderali EK. Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of self-management among people with poorly controlled type 1 and type 2 diabetes: the role of illness perceptions and self-efficacy. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:6708164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garay-Sevilla ME, Nava LE, Malacara JM, Huerta R, Díaz de León J, Mena A, et al. Adherence to treatment and social support in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complic. 1995;9(2):81–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Reyes-Lagunes I, García y Barragán LF, Procedimiento de validación psicométrica culturalmente relevante: un ejemplo. In: Rivera Aragón S, Díaz Loving R, Sánchez Aragón R, ReyesLagunes I, editors. La psicología social en México, XII. México: AMEPSO Universidad de Guanajuato y UNAM; 2008. p. 625–630.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Díaz RRM, Mendoza FME, Beltmont PJ. Validación de un instrumento para evaluar la adherencia terapéutica en diabéticas durante el embarazo. Perinatol Reprod Hum. 2004;18(4):217–24.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Villalobos-Pérez A, Brenes-Sáenz JC, Quirós-Morales D, León-Sanabria G. Características psicométricas de la escala de adherencia al tratamiento de la diabetes mellitus tipo II-Versión III (Eatdm-III©) en una muestra de pacientes diabéticos de Costa Rica. Acta Colombiana de Psicología. 2006;9(2):31–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hoyos DTN, Arteaga HMV, Muñoz CM. Fatores de no adherencia al tratamiento en personas con Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2 en el domicilio. La visión del cuidador familiar. Invest Educ Enferm. 2011;29(2):194–203.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ashur ST, Shah SA, Bosseri S, Fah TS, Shamsuddin K. Glycaemic control status among type 2 diabetic patients and the role of their diabetes coping behaviours: a clinic-based study in Tripoli. Libya Libyan J Med. 2016;11:31086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Aikens JE, Piette JD. Longitudinal association between medication adherence and glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30(3):338–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Alegre-Díaz J, Herrington W, López-Cervantes M, Gnatiuc L, Ramírez R, Hill M, et al. Diabetes and cause-specific mortality in Mexico City. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(20):1961–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Raj GD, Hashemi Z, Soria Contreras DC, Babwik S, Maxwell D, Bell RC, et al. Adherence to diabetes dietary guidelines assessed using a validated questionnaire predicts glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2018;2(1):78–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Borbón-Morales C, Robles VA, Huesca RL. Caracterización de los patrones alimentarios para los hogares en México y Sonora, 2005–2006. Estud Front. 2010;11(21):203–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pedersen BK. Anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: role in diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 2017;47(8):600–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No special funding was obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Beatriz Muñoz-López.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muñoz-López, D.B., Reyes Pérez, V., Garay-Sevilla, M.E. et al. Validation of an instrument to measure adherence to type 2 diabetes management. Int J Clin Pharm 43, 595–603 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01168-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01168-0

Keywords

Navigation