An evaluation of the role of practice pharmacists in Australia: a mixed methods study
- 173 Downloads
Background The need for greater collaboration between pharmacists and general practitioners in Australia facilitated the development of the practice pharmacist role. Practice pharmacists work from within general practices to provide services to patients and health professionals to improve the quality use of medications. Objective To explore the perceptions of Australian accredited pharmacists and pharmacists already working in general practices about current roles, facilitators and barriers, and remuneration expectations of practice pharmacists. Setting This study was conducted Australia wide. Method This was a two-stage study. The first stage involved a quantitative online questionnaire of accredited pharmacists whilst the second stage involved semistructured interviews with pharmacists working in general practice. Main outcome measure Pharmacists’ opinions on expected and current roles, barriers and facilitators, remuneration expectations and training requirements for practice pharmacist. Results A total of 65 accredited pharmacists completed the online survey and 20 practice pharmacists participated in interviews. The primary practice pharmacist roles identified included medication reviews, verifying the appropriateness of prescriptions, counselling and promoting adherence and providing education to other allied health professionals in the practice. The major facilitator identified was enhanced communication. Remuneration expectations and current working relationships were identified as main barriers. Conclusion The implementation of an appropriate funding model and a defined scope of role are critical to the successful implementation of the role of practice pharmacists.
KeywordsAustralia Collaborative care General practice Medication reviews Practice pharmacist
The authors would like to thank the pharmacists who agreed to be interviewed.
This study was not funded.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest for this study.
- 4.Avery A, Rodgers S, Cantrill J, Armstrong S, Cresswell K, Eden M, et al. A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9823):1310–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.The Department of Health. About the GP Super Clinics Programme. [Online] 2013. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/pasd-gpsuperclinic-about.
- 11.Hogg W, Lemelin J, Dahrouge S, Liddy C, Deri Armstrong C, Legault F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of anticipatory and preventative multidisciplinary team care. Can Fam Physic. 2009;55:76–85.Google Scholar
- 13.Creswell J, Klassen A, Plano Clark V, Smith K C. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. 2011. https://obssr.od.nih.gov/mixed_methods_research?.
- 15.Sixth Community Pharmacy Agreement. About 6CPA. [Online] 2015. http://6cpa.com.au/about-6cpa/.
- 16.Australian Government, Department of Health. Primary Health Networks (PHNs). [Online] 23 Sep 2016. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/PHN-Home.
- 19.Altavela J, Jones M, Ritter M. A prospective trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in a primary care practice in a capitated payment system. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2008;14(9):831–43.Google Scholar