Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical experience with the etanercept biosimilar SB4 in psoriatic patients

  • Short Research Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background After the expiry of the patent of reference etanercept, several biosimilars have been developed, including SB4. Objective To study safety and efficacy of SB4 in psoriatic patients previously treated with etanercept and in the etanercept naive ones. Method Patients affected by moderate to severe psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis attending the Psoriasis Center of Florence University, treated with SB4 were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided in two cohorts. Cohort 1 included 32 patients who were switched from previous etanercept, cohort 2 included 12 patients who were naive to etanercept. Results Evaluation of the efficacy of SB4 in cohort 1 patients revealed rates of clinical remission (defined as both PASI and/or DAS28 increase < 10%) of 92% and 64% for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis respectively. In cohort 2 at week 24 PASI 75 was observed in 75% of patients. Conclusion In our experience switching from originator to SB4 in psoriatic patients seems not to influence efficacy, especially cutaneous manifestations, over a median observational period of 24 weeks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scott LJ. Etanercept: a review of its use in autoimmune inflammatory diseases. Drugs. 2014;74(12):1379–410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Prinz JC, Puig L, Girolomoni G. Treatment of psoriasis with etanercept: the typical patient profile. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(7):1092–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weise M, Bielsky M-C, De Smet K, Ehmann F, Ekman N, Narayanan G, et al. Biosimilars-why terminology matters. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(8):690–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cho IH, Lee N, Song D, Jung SY, Bou-Assaf G, Sosic Z, et al. Evaluation of the structural, physicochemical, and biological characteristics of SB4, a biosimilar of etanercept. mAbs. 2016;8(6):1136–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Burness CB, Duggan ST. Etanercept (SB4): a Review in Autoimmune Inflammatory Diseases. BioDrugs Clin Immunother Biopharm Gene Ther. 2016;30(4):371–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Emery P, Vencovský J, Sylwestrzak A, Leszczyński P, Porawska W, Baranauskaite A, et al. A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(1):51–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moots R, Azevedo V, Coindreau JL, Dörner T, Mahgoub E, Mysler E, et al. Switching between reference biologics and biosimilars for the treatment of rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology inflammatory conditions: considerations for the clinician. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017;19(6):37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Egeberg A, Ottosen MB, Gniadecki R, Broesby-Olsen S, Dam TN, Bryld LE, et al. Safety, efficacy and drug survival of biologics and biosimilars for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(2):509–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gisondi P, Bianchi L, Calzavara-Pinton P, Conti A, Chiricozzi A, Fimiani M, et al. Etanercept biosimilar SB4 in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: data from the Psobiosimilars registry. Br J Dermatol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerdes S, Thaçi D, Griffiths CEM, Arenberger P, Poetzl J, Wuerth G, Afonso M, Woehling H. Multiple switches between GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar, with originator product do not impact efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis: 30-week results from the phase 3, confirmatory EGALITY study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(3):420–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Prignano.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pescitelli, L., Lazzeri, L., Di Cesare, A. et al. Clinical experience with the etanercept biosimilar SB4 in psoriatic patients. Int J Clin Pharm 41, 9–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0769-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0769-7

Keywords

Navigation