Perceptions, opinions and knowledge of pharmacists towards the use of complementary medicines by people living with cancer
- 95 Downloads
Background Biologically-based complementary medicine (BB-CM) use is prevalent amongst people living with cancer. Pharmacists play an important role in the provision of standard treatments for cancer. Less is known about pharmacist’s provision of BB-CM information. Objective This study investigated the opinions, perceptions and knowledge of pharmacists regarding the use of BB-CMs by people living with cancer and the facilitators and barriers to providing information and advice. Setting Australia. Method A cross-sectional 53-item survey was developed and the survey link distributed in two professional associations newsletters. The associations represent ~29,000 pharmacists. Questions were categories into pharmacist’s perceptions, opinions, and knowledge towards the use of BB-CM in cancer. Main Outcome Measure Scores obtained from responses to perception, opinion and knowledge statements and responses to demographic questions Results Respondents (n=70) were predominantly female (73%), Caucasian (66%) and under 40 years of age (78%). Respondents estimated that 19% of daily inquiries related to BB-CMs. Seventy-two per cent of respondents believed they had a responsibility to advise about the concomitant use of BB-CM with standard cancer treatments despite 60% reporting a lack of confidence in their knowledge. There was a moderate positive association (Spearman’s rho 0.41 p= 0.001) between a pharmacists confidence in their level of knowledge and their total knowledge scores. The main barriers to providing information about BB-CMs reported were inadequate training in BB-CMs (94%) and reservations about the evidence base for efficacy and safety (50%). Conclusion Pharmacists have a role to play in counselling people living with cancer about their use of BB-CMs and this role could be maximized with further training and education in this area.
KeywordsAustralia Cancer Complementary medicines Dietary supplements Herbal medicines Pharmacist’s knowledge Pharmacist’s perceptions
The authors would like to thank the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia and The Society of Hospital Pharmacists for their support in recruitment for this study and their members for participating.
There is no funding associated with this study.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 13.Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. Position statement on complementary medicines. 2016. https://www.psa.org.au/policies/complementary-medicines. Accessed 29 Jan 2018.
- 18.National Herbalists Association. Regulation of practitioners. 2016. http://www.nhaa.org.au/mediareleases/be-informed/regulation-of-practitioners?. Accessed 26 Jan 2019.
- 27.Marx W, McCarthy AL, Ried K, McKavanagh D, Vitetta L, Sali A, et al. The effect of a standardized ginger extract on chemotherapy-induced nausea-related quality of life in patients undergoing moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. Nutrients. 2017;9(8):867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Tsubaki K, Horiuchi A, Kitani T, Taniguchi N, Masaoka T, Shibata H, et al. Investigation of the preventive effect of CoQ10 against the side-effects of anthracycline antineoplastic agents. Gan to kagaku ryoho Cancer Chemother. 1984;11(7):1420–7.Google Scholar