Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of warfarin discharge education program on hospital readmission and treatment costs

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Although warfarin is highly effective, management of patients prescribed warfarin is complex due to its narrow therapeutic window. Objective To evaluate the impact of a formal warfarin discharge education program (WDEP) on hospital readmission and treatment costs in patients who received warfarin therapy. Setting Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Somerset in Somerville, New Jersey, USA. Method In this interventional cohort study, patients were assigned to either the WDEP group or the usual care group. The effects of the WDEP on readmission within 90 days after discharge were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. Factors influencing treatment cost were identified using generalized linear model with log-link function and gamma distribution. Main outcome measure Hospital readmission within 90 days and treatment costs associated with hospital readmission. Results Among 692 eligible patients, 203 in each group were matched using propensity scores and there were no statistically significant differences in the patient baseline characteristics between two groups. The risk of all-cause readmission within 90 days was significantly lower in the WDEP group compared to the usual care group (relative risk = 0.46, 95% CI 0.28–0.76). The treatment costs associated with hospital readmission in the WDEP group were 19% lower than those in the usual care group after adjusting for the study variables. Conclusion A formal, individualized WDEP provided by pharmacists resulted in significant reduction of readmission and treatment costs. The economic burden of treatment costs associated with warfarin can be controlled if well-organized warfarin education is provided to patients who received warfarin therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kimmel SE. Warfarin therapy: in need of improvement after all these years. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008;9(5):677–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwarz UI, Ritchie MD, Bradford Y, Li C, Dudek SM, Frye-Anderson A, et al. Genetic determinants of response to warfarin during initial anticoagulation. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(10):999–1008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wysowski DK, Nourjah P, Swartz L. Bleeding complications with warfarin use—a prevalent adverse effect resulting in regulatory action. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1414–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The Joint Commission. National Patient Safety Goals: Hospital Accreditation Program. 2017. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/NPSG_Chapter_HAP_Jan2017.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.

  5. Daniel SB, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, Richards CL. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):2002–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kimmel SE, Chen Z, Price M, Parker CS, Metlay JP, Christie JD, et al. The influence of patient adherence on anticoagulation control with warfarin—results from the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(3):229–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van Walraven C, Jennings A, Oake N, Fergusson D, Forster AJ. Effect of study setting on anticoagulation control—a systematic review and metaregression. Chest. 2006;129(5):1155–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oden A, Fahlen M. Oral anticoagulation and risk of death: a medical record linkage study. Br Med J. 2002;325(7372):1073–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kagansky N, Knobler H, Rimon E, Ozer Z, Levy S. Safety of anticoagulation therapy in well-informed older patients. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(18):2044–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beyth RJ, Landefeld CS. Learning the respective roles of warfarin and dabigatran to prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(10):714–5 W218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu A, Chow CM, Dao D, Errett L, Keith M. Factors influencing patient knowledge of warfarin therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006;21(3):169–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 8th ed. Brooks: Cole Cengage Learning; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dager WE, Branch JM, King JH, White RH, Quan RS, Musallam NA, et al. Optimization of inpatient warfarin therapy: impact of daily consultation by a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34:567–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DD. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc. 1984;79:516–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D’agostino RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sturmer T, Joshi M, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Rothman KJ, Schneeweiss S. A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:437–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gu XS, Rosenbaum PR. Comparison of multivariate matching methods: structures, distances, and algorithms. J Comput Graph Stat. 1993;2(4):405–20.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Caski F, editors. Proceedings of the second international symposium on information theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado; 1973:267–81.

  21. Anderson DR, Burnham KP. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  22. White RH, Beyth RJ, Zhou H, Romano PS. Major bleeding after hospitalization for deep-venous thrombosis. Am J Med. 1999;107(5):414–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wofford JL, Wells MD, Singh S. Best strategies for patient education about anticoagulation with warfarin: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/472-6963-8-40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilhelm SM, Petrovitch EA. Implementation of an inpatient anticoagulation teaching service: expanding the role of pharmacy students and residents in patient education. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68(21):2086–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Spyropoulos AC, Lin J. Direct medical costs of venous thromboembolism and subsequent hospital readmission rates: an administrative claims analysis from 30 managed care organizations. J Manag Care Pharm. 2007;13(6):475–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nasir K, Lin ZQ, Bueno H, Normand SLT, Drye EE, Keenan PS, et al. Is same-hospital readmission rate a good surrogate for all-hospital readmission rate? Med Care. 2010;48(5):477–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ms. Seyunghe Je and Mr. Sung-su Lee for their assiatance with searching articles and initial data entry.

Funding

This research was supported by Chung-Ang University Research Scholarship grants (Seoul, South Korea) awarded in 2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Churl Suh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 237 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brunetti, L., Lee, SM., Doherty, N. et al. Impact of warfarin discharge education program on hospital readmission and treatment costs. Int J Clin Pharm 40, 721–729 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0631-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0631-y

Keywords

Navigation