Skip to main content

Potentially inappropriate medications in a sample of Portuguese nursing home residents: Does the choice of screening tools matter?

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy volume 38, pages 1103–1111 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Background Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are often found in high proportion among the elderly population. The STOPP criteria have been suggested to detect more PIMs in European elderly than the Beers criteria. Objective This study aimed to determine the prevalence of PIMs and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) in a sample of Portuguese nursing homes residents. Setting Four elderly facilities in mainland Portugal Method A descriptive cross-sectional study was used. Elderly polypharmacy patients were included in the study and their medication (registered in patient clinical records) analysed using the Beers (2012 original version and 2008 version adapted to Portugal), STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria. Data were analysed using univariate and bivariate descriptive statistics, considering a confidence interval of 95 %. Main outcome measures: Prevalence of PIMs and PPOs. Results The sample included 161 individuals, with a mean age of 84.7 years (SD = 6.35), 68.9 % being female. A total of 807 PIMs and 90 PPOs were identified through the application of the three set of criteria. The prevalence of PIMs using the most recent version of the Beers criteria was 85.1 and 42.1 % for independent and dependent of diagnosis, respectively. The Portuguese adaptation of this same tool indicated a lower prevalence of PIMs, 60.3 and 16.7 %, respectively. The prevalence of PIMs using the STOPP criteria was 75.4 %, whilst the prevalence of PPOs, using START, was 42.9 %. There were significant differences in the mean number of PIMs detected depending on the tool used. (p < 0.001). Conclusions The application of the studied criteria in an elderly sample enabled the identification of a notable amount of PIMs and PPOs, indicating there is room for improving the quality of care. The variation in prevalence indicates careful choice of the tool is a prerequisite for engaging in medication review. Using START/STOPP criteria enabled a more holistic approach to the quality of prescribing in the elderly, highlighting low levels of cardiovascular risk prevention and abuse of psychotropic drugs, aside with system failures largely preventable by electronic prescribing and alert generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. PORDATA. Indicadores de envelhecimento em Portugal. http://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Indicadores+de+envelhecimento-526. Assessed 10 Oct 2014.

  2. Borges EP, Morgado M, Macedo AF. Prescribing omissions in elderly patients admitted to a stroke unit: descriptive study using START criteria. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012;34(3):481–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallagher P, Barry PJ, O´Mahony D. Inappropriate prescribing in the elderly. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2007;32(2):113–21.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan C, O’Mahony D, Kennedy J, Weedle P, Byrne S. Potentially inappropriate prescribing in an Irish elderly population in primary care. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;68(6):936–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. San-José A, Agustí A, Vidal X, Formiga F, López-Soto A, Fernández-Moyano A, et al. Inappropriate prescribing to older patients admitted to hospital: a comparison of different tools of misprescribing and underprescribing. Eur J Intern Med. 2014;25(8):710–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu CL, Peng LN, Chen YT, Lin MH, Liu LK, Chen LK. Potentially inappropriate prescribing (IP) for elderly medical inpatients in Taiwan: a hospital-based study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;55(1):148–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Retamal CG, Fernández RG, Espínola SF, Serrato AR, Ordóñez MA, Marín VP. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication in hospitalized elderly patients by using explicit criteria. Farm Hosp. 2014;38(4):305–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hill-Taylor B, Sketris I, Hayden J, Byrne S, O’Sullivan D, Christie R. Application of the STOPP/START criteria: a systematic review of the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults, and evidence of clinical, humanistic and economic impact. J Clin Pharm and Ther. 2013;38(5):360–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gillespie U, Alassaad A, Hammarlund-Udenaes M, Mörlin C, Henrohn D, Bertilsson M, Melhus H. Effects of pharmacists’ interventions on appropriateness of prescribing and evaluation of the instruments’ (MAI, STOPP and STARTs’) ability to predict hospitalization–analyses from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e62401.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Karandikar YS, Chaudhari SR, Dalal NP, Sharma M, Pandit VA. Inappropriate prescribing in the elderly: a comparison of two validated screening tools. JCGG. 2013;4(4):109–14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beers MH, Ouslander J, Rollingher I, Reuben D, Brooks J, Beck J. Explicit criteria for determining in—appropriate medication use in nursing homes. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(9):1825–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beers MH. Explicit criteria for determining potentially inappropriate medication use by the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(14):1531–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fick DM, Cooper JW, Wade WE, Waller JL, Maclean JR, Beers MH. Updating the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(22):2716–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Campanelli CM. American Geriatrics Society updated beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(4):616–31.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society. Updated Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;2015(63):2227–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soares MA, Fernandez-Llimós F, Lança C, Cabrita J, Morais JA. Operacionalização para Portugal: Critérios de Beers de Medicamentos Inapropriados nos Doentes Idosos. Acta Med Port. 2008;21(5):441–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cahir C, Moriarty F, Teljeur C, Fahey T, Bennett K. Potentially inappropriate prescribing and vulnerability and hospitalization in older community-dwelling patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2014;48(12):1546–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hudhra K, García-Caballos M, Jucja B, Casado-Fernández E, Espigares-Rodriguez E, Bueno-Cavanillas A. Frequency of potentially inappropriate prescriptions in older people at discharge according to Beers and STOPP criteria. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(3):596–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miquel MD, Cuervo MS, Silveira ED, Machuca IS, González-Blazquez S, Errasquin BM, Cruz-Jentoft AJ. Potentially inappropriate drug prescription in older subjects across health care settings. Eur Geriatr Med. 2010;1(1):9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lang PO, Hasso Y, Belmin J, Pavot I, Bayens JP, Vogt-Ferrier N, Gallagher P, O’Mahony D, Michel JP. STOPP-START: adaptation of a French language screening tool for detecting inappropriate prescriptions in older people. Can J Public Health. 2009;100(6):426–31 [Article in French].

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Delgado Silveira E, Montero Errasquín B, Muñoz-Garcia M, Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés M, Lozano Montoya I, Sánchez-Castellano C, et al. Improving drug prescribing in the elderly: a new edition of STOPP/START criteria. Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2015;50(2):89–96 [Article in Spanish].

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vermeulen Windsant-van den Tweel AM, Verduijn MM, Derijks HJ, van Marum RJ. Detection of inappropriate medication use in the elderly; will the STOPP and START criteria become the new Dutch standards? Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(40):A5076 [Article in Dutch].

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morin L, Fastbom J, Laroche ML, Johnell K. Potentially inappropriate drug use in older people: a nationwide comparison of different explicit criteria for population-based estimates. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80(2):315–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Oliveira-Martins S, Soares MA, van Mil JWF, Cabrita J. Inappropriate drug use by Portuguese elderly outpatients—effects of the Beers criteria update. Pharm World Sci. 2006;28:296–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gouveia Pinto C, Carrageta MO, Miguel LS. Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin in the prevention of ischemic heart disease in Portugal. Value Health. 2008;11(2):154–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang C-B, Chen J-H, Wen C-J, Kuo H-K, Lu I-S, Chiu L-S, Wu S-C, Chan D-C. Potentially inappropriate medications in geriatric outpatients with polypharmacy: application of six sets of published explicit criteria. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;72(3):482–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rocha O, Lunet N, Costa L, Barros H. Tratamento da osteoporose em Portugal: Tendência e variação geográfica. Acta Med Port. 2006;19:373–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ravera S, Hummel SA, Stolk P, Heerdink RE, de Jong–van den Berg LTW, de Gier JJ. The use of driving impairing medicines: a European survey. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;65:1139–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kojima G, Bell CL, Tamura B, Davis J, Inaba M, Masaki K. Combining quality improvement and geriatrics training: the nursing home polypharmacy outcomes project. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2014;35(4):395–408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pugh MJ, Hanlon JT, Zeber JE, et al. Assessing potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly Veterans Affairs population using the HEDIS 2006 quality measure. J Manag Care Pharm. 2006;12:537.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cahir C, Bennett K, Teljeur C, Fahey T. Potentially inappropriate prescribing and adverse health outcomes in community dwelling older patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;77(1):201–10.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Mahony D, O’Sullivan D, Byrne S, O’Connor MN, Ryan C, Gallagher P. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing. 2015;44:213–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tommelein E, Petrovic M, Somers A, Mehuys E, van der Cammen T, Boussery K. Older patients’ prescriptions screening in the community pharmacy: development of the Ghent Older People’s Prescriptions community Pharmacy Screening (GheOP3S) tool. J Public Health. 2016;38(2):e158–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Costa FA, Duggan C, Bates I. Validation of a survey tool for use in cross-cultural studies. Pharm Pract (Internet). 2008;6(3):121–7.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Endres HG, Kaufmann-Kolle P, Steeb V, Bauer E, Böttner C, Thürmann P. Association between potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and risk of hospitalization in older adults: an observational study based on routine data comparing PIM use with use of PIM alternatives. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0146811. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146811

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Bjerre LM, Halil R, Catley C, Farrel B, Hogel M, Blacks C, et al. Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in long-term care (LTC) patients: validation of the 2014 STOPP–START and 2012 Beers criteria in a LTC population—a protocol for a cross-sectional comparison of clinical and health administrative data. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e009715. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015009715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the people in charge of the elderly facilities that participated in this study and their clinical directors for their full support. We also acknowledge the important contribution of Lawrence Sturm in reviewing the English language.

Funding

The study did not receive any specific funding and all costs were entirely supported by Egas Moniz, Cooperativa de Ensino, SRL, located in Campus Universitário, Quinta da Granja, Monte da Caparica, Portugal.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Instituto Superior de Ciências da Saúde Egas Moniz (ISCSEM), Campus Universitário, Quinta da Granja, Monte da Caparica, 2829-551, Caparica, Portugal

    Filipa Alves da Costa, Catarina Periquito, Maria Clara Carneiro, Pedro Oliveira, Ana Isabel Fernandes & Patrícia Cavaco-Silva

  2. Epidemiology Department (ROR-Sul), Portuguese Institute of Oncology Lisbon Francisco Gentil (IPOLFG), Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisbon, Portugal

    Filipa Alves da Costa

  3. Pharmaceutical Society (OF), Rua da Sociedade Farmacêutica 18, 1169–075, Lisboa, Portugal

    Filipa Alves da Costa

Authors
  1. Filipa Alves da Costa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catarina Periquito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Clara Carneiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pedro Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ana Isabel Fernandes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Patrícia Cavaco-Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filipa Alves da Costa.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no financial or other relationships that might lead to a conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Costa, F.A., Periquito, C., Carneiro, M.C. et al. Potentially inappropriate medications in a sample of Portuguese nursing home residents: Does the choice of screening tools matter?. Int J Clin Pharm 38, 1103–1111 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0337-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0337-y

Keywords

  • Beers criteria
  • Inappropriate prescriptions
  • Elderly
  • Polypharmacy
  • Pharmaceutical care
  • Nursing homes
  • STOPP criteria
  • START criteria
  • Prescribing omissions
  • Medication review