INR optimization based on stroke risk factors in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
- 338 Downloads
Background Bleeding complications have been frequently reported in East Asian patients on warfarin with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0–3.0. Objective This study aimed to identify the optimal therapeutic range of the INR in Korean patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Setting Cardiovascular department of a 1320 inpatient bed Korean hospital. Method Retrospective chart review was conducted on 1014 patients for a total follow-up period of 2249.2 patient years. Major thromboembolic and bleeding complications were evaluated. The INR incidence of complication curve was plotted, and the optimal therapeutic range of INR was determined from the intersection of curves to ensure the lowest incidences of both thromboembolic and bleeding complications. For subgroup analysis, all patients were stratified by the following factors: age (above 75), disease (presence of hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and a history of stroke or thromboembolism), rhythm control procedure, and concurrent aspirin therapy. Main outcome measure Optimal therapeutic ranges of INR according to the risk factors. Results A total of 41 thromboembolic and 91 bleeding events occurred during the follow-up period. The complication rates were the lowest at an INR of 1.9 and the optimal therapeutic range was estimated to be 1.7–2.2 for the overall patients. The optimal therapeutic ranges of INR in the stratified patients were determined as follows: 1.3–1.8 in the patients ≥75 years of age; 1.5–2.0 in patients with hypertension, diabetes and concurrent aspirin therapy; 1.8–2.3 in patients with congestive heart failure; 1.9–2.4 in patients with previous stroke or thromboembolism; 1.7–2.2 in patients who had undergone rhythm control procedures. It has been shown that, by keeping the INR within these ranges, complication risks could be significantly reduced by up to 81 %. Conclusion The intensity of anticoagulation therapy for Korean patients with NVAF is optimal when INR is between 1.7 and 2.2.
KeywordsInternational normalized ratio Korea Non-valvular atrial fibrillation Warfarin
We are very grateful for the cooperation of the whole team of the cardiovascular department of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have declared no potential conflict of interests.
- 3.Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation). Eur Heart J. 2006;27(16):1979–2030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in partnership with the european society of cardiology and in collaboration with the european heart rhythm association and the heart rhythm society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(11):e101–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, van der Tweel I, Algra A, Klijn CJ. Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(2):167–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Douketis JD, Arneklev K, Goldhaber SZ, Spandorfer J, Halperin F, Horrow J. Comparison of bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with ximelagatran or warfarin: assessment of incidence, case-fatality rate, time course and sites of bleeding, and risk factors for bleeding. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(8):853–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Mant J, Hobbs FD, Fletcher K, Roalfe A, Fitzmaurice D, Lip GY, et al. Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9586):493–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Hong KS, Yu KH, Rha JH. Review of evidences and updates of the Korean clinical practice guidelines for stroke in 2013. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2013;31(3):143–50.Google Scholar
- 22.Schulman S, Beyth RJ, Kearon C, Levine MN, American College of Chest Physicians. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant and thrombolytic treatment: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edition). Chest. 2008;133(6 Suppl):25–98.Google Scholar
- 24.Kim JS, Jongnarangsin K, Latchamsetty R, Chugh A, Ghanbari H, Crawford T, et al. The optimal range of international normalized ratio for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation during therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(2):302–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar