Skip to main content
Log in

Potential medication errors associated with computer prescriber order entry

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Introduction To assess the frequency of medication errors (ME) induced or enhanced by computerized physician order entry (CPOE). Error type, drug classes involved, specialty, patient outcome and system failures were also evaluated. Methods Observational quantitative study in a large tertiary care medical center over March 2012 3 years after CPOE implementation. Pharmacists detected ME associated with CPOE (those that wouldn’t have occurred if the clinician had prescribed manually) and unassociated in pharmacological treatments in inpatients of 13 specialties (421 beds). Main outcome measured were ME associated and unassociated with CPOE. Results We found 714 ME with 85.857 drug prescriptions (a 0.8 % error rate, 95 % CI 0.6–0.7). Percentage of error associated with CPOE was 77.7 %. The main types of error related to CPOE were wrong medication selection (20.9 %) and improper data placement (20.3 %). Failures with medications prescribed in primary care, unavailable in the hospital pharmacy, were involved in 21.6 % of all ME. Errors involving surgical specialties were double those involving medical specialties (1.2 vs. 0.6 %). Most ME associated with CPOE were potential errors (90 %). During the study system failures occurred four times. Conclusions The use of CPOE minimises the occurrence of medication errors, however, they still occur. Most errors are associated with the CPOE technology. We therefore face a new challenge in the prevention of ME that require a change in strategy for patient safety. Continued training of prescribers, standardization of the electronic prescription programs and integration between computer applications in hospitals and with primary care should be a priority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Poon EG, Keohane CA, Yoon CS, Ditmore M, Bane A, Levtzion-Korach O, et al. Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1698–707.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bobb A, Gleason K, Husch M, Feinglas J, Yarnold PR, Noskin GA. The epidemiology of prescribing errors. The potential impact of computerized prescriber order entry. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:785–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the harvard medical practice study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Larid N, Peterson L, Small SD, Servi D, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274:29–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bates DW, Kuperman G, Teicc JM. Computerized physician order entry and quality of care. Qual Manag Health Care. 1994;2:18–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Shea B, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280:1311–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Villamañán E, Herrero A, Álvarez-Sala R. Prescripción electrónica asistida como nueva tecnología para la seguridad del paciente hospitalizado. Med Clin (Barc). 2011;136:398–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Villamañán E, Herrero A, Álvarez-Sala R. The assisted electronic prescription in patients hospitalized in a chest diseases ward. Arch Bronconeumol. 2011;47:138–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Villamañán E, Larrubia Y, Ruano M, Herrero A, Álvarez-Sala R. Strategies for improving documentation and reducing medication errors related to drug allergy. Int J Clin Pharm. 2011;33:879–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bates DW, Grawande AA. Patient safety. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2526–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaushal R, Jha AK, Franz C, Glaser T, Shetty KD, Jaqqi T, et al. Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2006;13:261–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2004;11:104–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berger RG, Kichak JP. Computerized physician order entry: helpful or harmful? J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2004;11:100–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care—an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2007;14:542–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Horsky J, Kuperman GJ, Patel VL. Comprehensive analysis of a medication dosing error related to CPOE. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2005;12:377–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005;9(293):1197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiner J, Kfuri T, Chan K, Fowles J. “e-Iatrogenesis”: the most critical unintended consequence of CPOE an other HIT. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2007;14:387–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaushal R, Kaveh S, Bates DW. Effect of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systemic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1409–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B. Russel Localio A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005;293:1197–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Campbell EM, Sitting DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2006;13:547–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and prevention. NCCMERP. Taxonomy of medication errors. (Accessed 5 April 2013 at

  22. Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Machan C, Siebert U. The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: a systematic review. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2008;15:585–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh H, Mani S, Espadas D, Petersen N, Franklin V, Petersen LA. Prescription errors and outcomes related to inconsistent information transmitted through computerized order-entry: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:982–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Clemmer TP, Weaver LK, Orme JF Jr, et al. A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:232–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Eslami S, Keizer N, Abu-Hanna A. The impact of computerized physician medication order entry in hospitalized patients—a systemic review. Int J Med Inf. 2008;77:365–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Asch DA. Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1340–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


No special financial support was obtained for this study.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Villamañán.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Villamañán, E., Larrubia, Y., Ruano, M. et al. Potential medication errors associated with computer prescriber order entry. Int J Clin Pharm 35, 577–583 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: