Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Review of the cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve seamless care focusing on medication

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim of the review This review of the international literature aims to assess the evidence and its methodological quality relating to the cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve seamless care focusing on medication. Method Studies were identified by searching Medline, EMBASE, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EconLit up to March 2011 using search terms related to health economics and to seamless care. To be included, economic evaluations had to explore the costs and consequences of an intervention to improve seamless care focusing on medication as compared with usual care. Methodological quality of studies was assessed by considering perspective; design; source of clinical and economic data; cost and consequence measures; allowance for uncertainty; and incremental analysis. Costs were actualized to 2007 values. Results Eight studies on medication interventions for hospitalized patients in the transition between ambulatory and hospital care were included in the review. A variety of types of medication interventions and target populations have been assessed, but the evidence is limited to one economic evaluation for each particular intervention type and each specific target population. Most studies demonstrated an impact of interventions on compliance and (re)hospitalization rates and costs. The studies did not find an impact on quality of life or symptoms. Economic evaluations suffered from methodological limitations related to the narrow perspective; restriction to health care costs only; exclusion of costs of the intervention; use of intermediate consequence measures; no allowance for uncertainty; and absence of incremental analysis. Conclusion In light of the small number of economic evaluations and their methodological limitations, it is not possible to recommend a specific intervention to improve seamless care focusing on medication on health economic grounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists and Canadian Pharmacists. In: Proceedings of the seamless care workshop, Ottawa; 1998.

  2. Continuity of care in medication management: review of issues and considerations for pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005;62(16):1714–1720.

  3. Tam VC, Knowles SR, Cornish PL, Fine N, Marchesano R, Etchells EE. Frequency, type and clinical importance of medication history errors at admission to hospital: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2005;173(5):505–510.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paulino EI, Bouvy ML, Gastelurrutia MA, Guerreiro M, Buurma H. Drug related problems identified by European community pharmacists in patients discharged from hospital. Pharm World Sci. 2004;26(6):353–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Viktil KK, Blix HS. The impact of clinical pharmacists on drug-related problems and clinical outcomes. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;102(3):275–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ernst FR, Grizzle AJ. Drug-related morbidity and mortality: updating the cost-of-illness model. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2001;41(2):192–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson JA, Bootman JL. Drug-related morbidity and mortality. A cost-of-illness model. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(18):1949–1956.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spinewine A, Foulon V, Claeys C, De Lepeleire J, Chevalier P, Desplenter FA, et al. Seamless care focusing on medication between hospital and home. Brussels; 2010 (Report No.: KCE report 131A).

  9. Drummond M, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Badger N, Mullis S, Butler K, Tucker D. Pharmacist’s intervention for older hospitalized patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64(17):1794–1796.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coleman EA, Parry C, Chalmers S, Min SJ. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(17):1822–1828.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smeenk FW, Ament AJ, van Haastregt JC, de Witte LP, Crebolder HF. Cost analysis of transmural home care for terminal cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;35(3):201–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart S, Vandenbroek AJ, Pearson S, Horowitz JD. Prolonged beneficial effects of a home-based intervention on unplanned readmissions and mortality among patients with congestive heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(3):257–261.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cabezas C, Salvador C, Quadrada D, Bartés A, Boré M, Perea N, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a post discharge pharmaceutical care program versus regular follow-up in patients with heart failure. Farmacia Hospitalaria. 2006;30(6):328–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Desplenter FA. Exploring the impact of medication information for psychiatric patients at hospital discharge. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dudas V, Bookwalter T, Kerr KM, Pantilat SZ. The impact of follow-up telephone calls to patients after hospitalization. Am J Med. 2001;111(9B):26S–30S.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hugtenburg JG, Borgsteede SD, Beckeringh JJ. Medication review and patient counselling at discharge from the hospital by community pharmacists. Pharm World Sci. 2009.

  18. Jack BW, Chetty VK, Anthony D, Greenwald JL, Sanchez GM, Johnson AE, et al. A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(3):178–187.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Karnon J, Campbell F, Czoski-Murray C. Model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions aimed at preventing medication error at hospital admission (medicines reconciliation). J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(2):299–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith L, McGowan L, Moss-Barclay C, Wheater J, Knass D, Chrystyn H. An investigation of hospital generated pharmaceutical care when patients are discharged home from hospital. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;44(2):163–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Karapinar-Carkit F, Borgsteede SD, Zoer J, Siegert C, van TM, Egberts AC, et al. The effect of the COACH program (continuity of appropriate pharmacotherapy, patient counselling and information transfer in healthcare) on readmission rates in a multicultural population of internal medicine patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:39.

Download references

Funding

Financial support for this research was received from the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, a state-funded research institution.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmaco-economics, Katholieke, Universiteit Leuven, Onderwijs en Navorsing 2, Herestraat 49, P.O. Box 521, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Steven Simoens & Veerle Foulon

  2. Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

    Anne Spinewine

  3. Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Centre, Brussels, Belgium

    Dominique Paulus

Authors
  1. Steven Simoens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Spinewine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Veerle Foulon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dominique Paulus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Simoens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simoens, S., Spinewine, A., Foulon, V. et al. Review of the cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve seamless care focusing on medication. Int J Clin Pharm 33, 909–917 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9563-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9563-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation