Skip to main content

Reasons why medicines are returned to Swedish pharmacies unused

Pharmacy World and Science volume 28, pages 352–358 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

To identify the reasons and their relative importance why medicines are returned to Swedish pharmacies unused.

Setting:

A random sample of the pharmacies in Sweden.

Method:

Interviews using a semi-structered interview form with pharmacy customers returning unused medicines to the pharmacy.

Main outcome measure:

Reasons given by patients/relatives/carers for returning unused medicines to the pharmacy.

Results:

The four main reasons for returning unused medicines to the pharmacy were: (1) the medicines were too old, (2) the user had died, (3) there was no need for the medicine anymore, and (4) therapy changes. These reasons made up 75% of all reported reasons.

Conclusion:

Hoarding or over-supply of prescribed medicines may explain a large part of the volume of medicines that remain unused. Actions aiming to reduce waste of prescribed medicines ought to focus on those patients who contribute to a substantial part of all unused medicines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Ekedahl A, Wergeman L, Rydberg T. Unused drugs in Sweden measured by returns to pharmacies. J Soc Adm Pharm 2003;20:26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Isacson D, Olofsson C. Drugs up in smoke: a study of caseated drugs in Sweden. Pharm World Sci 1999;21(2):96–99.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook H. Why so many drugs go to waste. Pharm Pract 1996;6(8):268–70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ekedahl A. Unused drugs returned to pharmacies—a few patients return a large proportion of the unused drugs. J Soc Adm Pharm 2003;20:257–58.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Braybrook S, John DN, and Leong K. A survey of why medicines are returned to pharmacies. Pharm J 1999;263:7063.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hawksworth GM, Wright DJ, and Chrystyn H. A detailed analysis of the day to day unwanted medicinal products returned to community pharmacies for disposal. J Soc Adm Pharm 1996;13(4):215–22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones S. Assessing the effectiveness of one-stop dispensing. Hosp Pharm 2002;9:237–39.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Langley C, Marriott J, Mackridge A, Daniszewski R. An analysis of returned medicines in primary care. Pharm World Sci 2005;27(4):296–99.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cameron S. Study by Alberta pharmacists indicates drug wastage a “mammoth” problem. Can Med Ass J 1996;155(11):1596–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thormodsen M, Fonnelop H, Rytter E, Torisen HM. “To be used as directed by your physician”—reasons why patients do not use prescribed medicines. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1997;117(24):3521–25 (norwegian).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hulter Åsberg K. 900 tons of drugs are returned to pharmacies annually A questionnaire study on unused drugs. Läkartidningen 2004;101:898–900 (swedish).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grainger-Rousseau T-J, Fielding DW, Smith MA, Daws D, Desrosiers D. What’s left in the medicine cabinet? The BC EnviRx Project. Poster No. 296. International Congress on Clinical Pharmacy, Orlando, FL, April 1999.

  13. Eklund LH, Wessling A. Unused returned drugs. Sven Farm Tidskr 1975;79:499–3 (swedish).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boethius G, Möller B. Returned drugs in relation to prescribed—frequency, reason and cost. Sven Farm Tidskr 1979;83(14):539–42 (swedish).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wold G, Hunskår S. Bruk og kast av medikamenter i hjemmet. Erfaringer fra en kommunal innsamlingsaksjon [Use and disposal of drugs at home. Experiences of a community campaign for drug collection]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1992;112(12):1605–7 (norwegian).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergh H, Marklund B. Characteristics of frequent attenders in different age and sex groups in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2003;21:171–77.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Browne GB, Humphrey B, Pallister R, Browne J, Shetzer L. Prevalence and characteristics of frequent attenders in a prepaid Canadian family practice. J Fam Pract 1982;14:63–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Andersson SO, Mattsson B, Lynoe N. Patients frequently consulting general practitioners at a primary health care centre in Sweden: a comparative study. Scand J Soc Med 1995;23:251–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Svab I, Zaletel-Kragelj L. Frequent attenders in general practice: a study from Slovenia. Scand J Prim Health Care 1993;11:38–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jyvasjarvi S, Keinaenen-Kiukaanniemmi S, Vaeisaenen E, Larivaara P, Kivelae SL. Frequent attenders in a Finnish health centre: morbidity and reasons for encounter. Scand J Prim Health Care 1998;16:141–48.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Neal RD, Heywood PL, Morley S, Clayden AD, Dowell A. Frequency of patients’ consulting in general practice and workload generated by frequent attenders: comparisons between practices. Br J Gen Pract 1998;48:895–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the work of the interviewers at the 59 participating pharmacies as well as the assistance from Mr Örjan Åkeren, of The National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies, with the data on licensed drugs in Sweden. Funding of the study: The study was supported financially through a grant from “Stiftelsen Apoteket AB:s fond för forskning och studier i hälsoekonomi och samhällsfarmaci”.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. R&D Department, The National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies, Medical Research Centre (MRC) Ing 59, University Hospital MAS, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden

    Anders B. E. Ekedahl

Authors
  1. Anders B. E. Ekedahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders B. E. Ekedahl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekedahl, A.B.E. Reasons why medicines are returned to Swedish pharmacies unused. Pharm World Sci 28, 352–358 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-006-9055-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-006-9055-1

Keywords

  • Drugs
  • Drug waste
  • Medicines
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Pharmacies
  • Sweden
  • Unused medicines