Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 447–452 | Cite as

Flemish Community Pharmacists’ Motivation and Views Related to Continuing Education

  • Annelies DriesenEmail author
  • Lies Leemans
  • Herman Baert
  • Gert Laekeman
Research Article



IPSA (Institute for Permanent Study for Pharmacists) wanted to assess community pharmacists’ opinion on CE-related issues in order to develop more tailored CE programs.


A survey for self-administration was sent to 1691 community pharmacists. The method of stratified sampling was used to include pharmacists who do not take up CE courses as well.

Main outcome measures:

(1) Preferences for course formats, topics of interest and opinion on different CE providers; (2) Facilitators and barriers for participation in CE courses; (3) Opinion on rewarding and participation, obligation and willingness to pay.


A response rate of 62.8% was obtained after three mailings. Lectures remain the most favorite course format. Topics related to pharmaceutical care are the most wanted. The strongest facilitators for attending CE courses are gathering practical knowledge and keeping scientific knowledge up to standard. Social contact with colleagues and receiving a syllabus are perceived as moderately motivating factors. Most frequently mentioned barriers were lack of time, family constraints, distance to the classes and uninteresting subjects. Around 2/3rd of questioned pharmacists are willing to invest more time in CE when participation would be rewarded. When it comes to opinion on mandatory CE, disagreement exists between pharmacists who take up CE courses and those who don’t, the latter being less in favor.


This survey revealed community pharmacists’ opinions, wishes and needs concerning CE. This should enable CE providers to develop more tailored CE programs.


Belgium Community pharmacists Continuing education Motivation Needs assessment Opinion assessment Survey 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Igarashi, M, Suveges, L, Moss, G 2002A comparison of two methods of needs assessment: implications for continuing professional educationCan J University Cont Educ285776Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lievens, A, Niclaes, E, Roose, K 2003Helpful and professional advice? Survey in pharmaciesTest Gezondheid542426Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tromp, Th FJ 1999Report of the Task Force to the European Association of Faculties of Pharmacies for implementing Pharmaceutical Care into the curriculumRijksuniversiteit GroningenThe NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leemans, L. 1996Information seeking behaviour and counselling on OTC-products of Flemish pharmacists [Dissertation]Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenBelgium[in Dutch]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cancrinus-Matthijsse, A 1995Between assistance and entrepreneurship [Dissertation]Rijksuniversiteit GroningenThe Netherlands[in Dutch]Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kirckpatrick, DL 1998Evaluating training programs: the four levelsBerrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, USAISBN: 1-57675-042-6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baert H et al. EDUBELL working document. Project Needs assessment in the context of lifelong learning/2002-Development of a methodology for the assessment of educational needs. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, 2004Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Queeny, DS 1995Assessing needs in continuing education: an essential tool for quality improvementJossey-BassSan Francisco USA ISBN: 0-7879-0059-1Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cordero, L, Cadavid, MI, Fernandéz-Llimós, F, Díaz, C, Sanz, F, Loza, MI 2004Continuing education and community pharmacists in Galicia: a study of opinionsPharm World Sci26173177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scott, VG, Amonkar, MM, Madhavan, SS 2001Pharmacists’ preferences for continuing education and certificate programsAnn Pharmacother35289299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maio, V, Belazi, D, Goldfarb, NI, Philips, AL, Crawford, AG 2003Use and effectiveness of pharmacy continuing-education materialsAm J Health-Syst Pharm60164449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoyle, S, Mottram, DR, Williamson, PM, Hart, A 1990A study into how community pharmacists update their pharmaceutical knowledgePharm J245E89Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hull, H, Rutter, P 2003A cross sectional survey of UK community pharmacists’ views on continuing education and continuing professional developmentInt J Pharm Educ2112Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hanson, AL, Muth, JE 1991Facilitators and barriers to pharmacists’ participation in lifelong learningAm J Pharm Educ552029Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jennings, HR, Empey, PE, Smith, KM 2000Survey of ASHP-accredited pharmacy residency programsAm J Health-Syst Pharm22208086Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    James, D, Beaumont, S, Carter, S, Davies, JG 2002A framework for assessing the continuous professional development needs of community pharmacistsPharm Educ26368Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annelies Driesen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lies Leemans
    • 1
  • Herman Baert
    • 2
  • Gert Laekeman
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Drug and Patient Information, Faculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesK.U.LeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Educational SciencesCentre for Research on Adult and Continuing EducationK.U.LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations