Abstract
Background: Pneumonia is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among children in many developing countries. It is reported that 12.9 million children under 5 years of age died world-wide in 1990 and one-third of these deaths or 4.3 million annually were attributed to acute respiratory infection with pneumonia. Objectives:On this basis, a study was conducted in a district hospital to study the therapy outcomes of antibiotic regimens used in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) management and to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CE) between IV ampicillin versus combination therapy of IV ampicillin and IV gentamicin. Method:A prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind study was conducted in a pediatric ward in a 80-bed district hospital. Pediatric patients diagnosed with CAP aged 2 months to 5 years old were randomly and equally divided into two treatment arms: ampicillin versus ampicillin plus gentamicin. The dose of IV ampicillin used in this study was 100 mg/kg/day divided every 6 h and 5 mg/kg of IV gentamicin as a single daily dose. Both clinical and economic evaluations were carried out to compare both treatment arms. Results:With the inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 40 patients diagnosed with CAP were included in the study. The results showed that the two treatment arms were significantly different (P < 0.05) in terms of duration of patients on ampicillin, number of days of hospitalization and time to switch to oral therapy. A significant difference was noted between the two treatment modalities in terms of effectiveness and cost (P < 0.05). Conclusion:Overall, the endpoint of this study showed that the total cost per patient of ampicillin-treated group is cheaper than the total cost with the combination therapy (ampicillin plus gentamicin) and reduced unnecessary exposure to adverse effects or toxicities. Besides that, addition of gentamicin in the treatment modalities will only increase the cost of treatment without introducing any changes in the treatment outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Leowski (1986) ArticleTitleMortality from acute respiratory infections in children under 5 years of age: a global estimates World Health Stat Q 39 138–44 Occurrence Handle3751104
F. Shann (1986) ArticleTitleEtiology of severe pneumonia in children in developing countries Pediatr Infect Dis J 5 247–52
InstitutionalAuthorNameWHO (1992) Programme for control of acute respiratory infections 5th programme report 1990–1991 WHO Geneva
InstitutionalAuthorNameWHO (1991) Technical bases for the WHO recommendation on the management of pneumonia in children at first level health facilities WHO Geneva
F. Shann et al. (1985) ArticleTitleChloramphenicol alone versus chloramphenicol plus penicillin for severe pneumonia in children Lancet 28 684–5 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92928-9
H. Campbell et al. (1998) ArticleTitleTrial of co-trimoxazole versus procaine penicillin with ampicillin in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in young Gambian children Lancet 19 1182–1184
H William AR Hayward JL Myron et al. (1998) Current pediatric diagnosis and treatment, 14th ed Appleton and Large Connecticut
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hasali, M.A.A., Ibrahim, M.I.M., Sulaiman, S.A.S. et al. A Clinical and Economic Study of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Between Single Versus Combination Therapy. Pharm World Sci 27, 249–253 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-004-7039-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-004-7039-6