Abstract
Introduction
The pharmaceutical industry involves handling of powders on a large scale for manufacturing of solid dosage forms such as tablets and capsules constituting about 85% of the dosage forms. During this manufacturing process, powders get electrostatically charged due to numerous particle–particle and particle-equipment wall collisions. Most of the pharmaceutical powders are insulators in nature and they accumulate charge for longer durations making it difficult to dissipate the generated charge. In this study, a surface modified blender has been used to analyze tribocharging in pharmaceutical powders.
Methods
The surface modified blender has been fabricated using two types of materials, an insulator, and a conductor. The conductor or the metal arm induces charge of opposite polarity to that of the charge induced by the insulator arm and the overall charge on the powder decreases during the tumbling motion of the blender. Ibuprofen was used as the model drug and processed in aluminum, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), stainless steel, surface modified aluminum-PVC (Al-PVC) and surface modified stainless steel- PVC (SS-PVC) blender at 20% RH for different blending times such as 2, 10, 20, 30 and 40 min. To better understand the tribocharging phenomenon in surface modified V blenders, an experimentally validated computational model was developed using Discrete Element Method (DEM) modeling.
Results
Significant reduction (> 50%) in electrostatic charge was observed for Ibuprofen using surface modified blenders in comparison to metal only and insulator only V blenders. Additionally, an identical charging trend was observed between the simulation and experimental data.
Conclusion
It was established that careful selection of equipment materials could significantly reduce the electrostatic charging of pharmaceutical powders and DEM model could be a really useful tool in assessing the applicability of the modified V blenders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ireland PM. Dynamic particle-surface tribocharging: The role of shape and contact mode. J Electrost. Published online 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2012.08.004.
Glor M. Hazards due to electrostatic charging of powders. J Electrost. Published online 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3886(85)90041-5.
Karner S, Urbanetz NA. Arising of electrostatic charge in the mixing process and its influencing factors. Powder Technol. 2012;1(226):261–8.
Šupuk E, Zarrebini A, Reddy JP, et al. Tribo-electrification of active pharmaceutical ingredients and excipients. Powder Technol. 2012;217:427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.059.
Mullarney MP, Hancock BC. Improving the prediction of exceptionally poor tableting performance: An investigation into Hiestand’s “special case.” J Pharm Sci. Published online 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.20108.
Asare-Addo K, Šupuk E, Al-Hamidi H, Owusu-Ware S, Nokhodchi A, Conway BR. Triboelectrification and dissolution property enhancements of solid dispersions. Int J Pharm. 2015;485(1–2):306–16.
Beeckmans JM, Inculet II, Dumas G. Enhancement in segregation of a mixed powder in a fluidized bed in the presence of an electrostatic field. Powder Technol. 1979;24(2):267–9.
Alexander AW, Chaudhuri B, Faqih AM, Muzzio FJ, Davies C, Tomassone MS. Avalanching flow of cohesive powders. Powder Technol. Published online 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2006.01.017.
Wong J, Kwok PCL, Chan HK. Electrostatics in pharmaceutical solids. Chem Eng Sci. 2015;125:225–37.
Lacks DJ, Shinbrot T. Long-standing and unresolved issues in triboelectric charging. Nat Rev Chem. 2019;3(8):465–76.
Murtomaa M, Harjunen P, Mellin V, Lehto VP, Laine E. Effect of amorphicity on the triboelectrification of lactose powder. J Electrost. 2002;56(1):103–10.
Trigwell S, Grable N, Yurteri CU, Sharma R, Mazumder MK. Effects of surface properties on the tribocharging characteristics of polymer powder as applied to industrial processes. IEEE Trans Ind Appl. 2003;39(1):79–86.
Shinbrot T, Ferdowsi B, Sundaresan S, Araujo NAM. Multiple timescale contact charging. Phys Rev Mater. 2018;2(12):125003.
Murtomaa M, Mellin V, Harjunen P, Lankinen T, Laine E, Lehto VP. Effect of particle morphology on the triboelectrification in dry powder inhalers. Int J Pharm. 2004;282(1–2):107–14.
hu K, Tan RBH, Chen F, Ong KH, Heng PWS. Influence of particle wall adhesion on particle electrification in mixers. Int J Pharm. Published online 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.07.041.
Tettey KE, Lee D. Effect of thermal treatment and moisture content on the charge of silica particles in non-polar media. Soft Matter. 2013;9(30):7242–50.
Peart J. Powder electrostatics: theory, techniques and applications. KONA Powder Part J. 2001;19(May):34–45.
Elajnaf A, Carter P, Rowley G. Electrostatic characterisation of inhaled powders: Effect of contact surface and relative humidity. Eur J Pharm Sci. Published online 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2006.07.006.
Ducati TRD, Simões LH, Galembeck F. Charge partitioning at gas-solid interfaces: humidity causes electricity buildup on metals. Langmuir ACS J Surf Colloids. 2010;26(17):13763–6.
Sarkar S, Cho J, Chaudhuri B. Mechanisms of electrostatic charge reduction of granular media with additives on different surfaces. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif. 2012;62:168–75.
Naik S, Hancock B, Abramov Y, Yu W, Rowland M, Huang Z, et al. Quantification of tribocharging of pharmaceutical powders in V-blenders: experiments, multiscale modeling, and simulations. J Pharm Sci. 2016;105(4):1467–77.
Sen K, Mehta T, W.K.Ma A, Chaudhuri B. DEM based investigation of powder packing in 3D printing of pharmaceutical tablets. EPJ Web Conf. 2021;249:14012.
Naik S, Sarkar S, Gupta V, Hancock BC, Abramov Y, Yu W, et al. A combined experimental and numerical approach to explore tribocharging of pharmaceutical excipients in a hopper chute assembly. Int J Pharm. 2015;491(1–2):58–68.
Rasera JN, Cruise RD, Cilliers JJ, Lamamy JA, Hadler K. Modelling the tribocharging process in 2D and 3D. Powder Technol. 2022;1(407):117607.
Pei C, Wu CY, England D, Byard S, Berchtold H, Adams M. Numerical analysis of contact electrification using DEM–CFD. Powder Technol. 2013;1(248):34–43.
Hogue MD, Calle CI, Weitzman PS, Curry DR. Calculating the trajectories of triboelectrically charged particles using Discrete Element Modeling (DEM). J Electrost. 2008;66(1):32–8.
Yurteri CU, Mazumder MK, Grable N, et al. Electrostatic effects on dispersion, transport, and deposition of fine pharmaceutical powders: Development of an experimental method for quantitative analysis. Part Sci Technol. Published online 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/02726350215330.
Mukherjee R, Sen K, Fontana L, Mao C, Chaudhuri B. Quantification of Moisture-Induced Cohesion in Pharmaceutical Mixtures. J Pharm Sci. Published online 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2018.07.006.
Sen K, Manchanda A, Mehta T, Ma AWK, Chaudhuri B. Formulation design for inkjet-based 3D printed tablets. Int J Pharm. Published online 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119430.
Cundall PA, Strack ODL. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique. 1979;29(1):47–65.
Mindlin RD. Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. J Appl Mech. 2021;16(3):259–68.
Li Y, Xu H, Jing C, Jiang J, Hou X. A novel heat transfer model of biomass briquettes based on secondary development in EDEM. Renew Energy. 2019;1(131):1247–54.
Bailey AG. Charging of solids and powders. J Electrost. 1993;1(30):167–80.
Bailey AG. Electrostatic phenomena during powder handling. Powder Technol. 1984;37(1):71–85.
Song D, Mehrani P. Mechanism of particle build-up on gas-solid fluidization column wall due to electrostatic charge generation. Powder Technol. 2017;1(316):166–70.
Sippola P, Kolehmainen J, Ozel A, Liu X, Saarenrinne P, Sundaresan S. Experimental and numerical study of wall layer development in a tribocharged fluidized bed. J Fluid Mech. 2018;849:860–84.
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to sincerely thank Professor Julian A. Norato from the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Connecticut for providing the access to Altair EDEM. We would also like to thank Scott Laforest from University of Connecticut machine shop for helping us fabricate the V blenders. A special thanks to Daniel Sniffin from High performance computing (HPC) at the University of Connecticut for helping us perform the simulations and troubleshooting.
Funding
This study was supported by the University of Connecticut START Preliminary Proof of Concept Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mehta, T., Mukherjee, R., Shah, A. et al. Mitigation of Tribocharging in Pharmaceutical Powders using Surface Modified V-Blenders. Pharm Res 40, 2371–2381 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-023-03612-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-023-03612-y