Advertisement

Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 32, Issue 9, pp 3102–3109 | Cite as

Intermolecular Interactions and the Viscosity of Highly Concentrated Monoclonal Antibody Solutions

  • Elaheh Binabaji
  • Junfen Ma
  • Andrew L ZydneyEmail author
Research Paper

ABSTRACT

Purpose

The large increase in viscosity of highly concentrated monoclonal antibody solutions can be challenging for downstream processing, drug formulation, and delivery steps. The objective of this work was to examine the viscosity of highly concentrated solutions of a high purity IgG1 monoclonal antibody over a wide range of protein concentrations, solution pH, ionic strength, and in the presence / absence of different excipients.

Methods

Experiments were performed with an IgG1 monoclonal antibody provided by Amgen. The steady-state viscosity was evaluated using a Rheometrics strain-controlled rotational rheometer with a concentric cylinder geometry.

Results

The viscosity data were well-described by the Mooney equation. The data were analyzed in terms of the antibody virial coefficients obtained from osmotic pressure data evaluated under the same conditions. The viscosity coefficient in the absence of excipients was well correlated with the third osmotic virial coefficient, which has a negative value (corresponding to short range attractive interactions) at the pH and ionic strength examined in this work.

Conclusions

These results provide important insights into the effects of intermolecular protein-protein interactions on the behavior of highly concentrated antibody solutions.

KEY WORDS

antibody protein interactions rheology virial coefficients viscosity 

Abbreviations

BSA

Bovine serum albumin

IgG

Immunoglobulin G

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLOSURES

The authors would like to acknowledge Amgen, Inc. for donation of the monoclonal antibody and for their financial support. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Ralph Colby in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at Penn State for use of the RFS II Rheometrics Fluids Spectrometer.

References

  1. 1.
    Shire SJ, Shahrokh Z, Liu J. Challenges in the development of high protein concentration formulations. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93(6):1390–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu J, Nguyen MD, Andya JD, Shire SJ. Reversible self-association increases the viscosity of a concentrated monoclonal antibody in aqueous solution. J Pharm Sci. 2005;94(9):1928–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chari R, Jerath K, Badkar A, Kalonia D. Long- and short-range electrostatic interactions affect the rheology of highly concentrated antibody solutions. Pharm Res. 2009;26(12):2607–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saito S, Hasegawa J, Kobayashi N, Kishi N, Uchiyama S, Fukui K. Behavior of monoclonal antibodies: relation between the second virial coefficient (B2) at low concentrations and aggregation propensity and viscosity at high concentrations. Pharm Res. 2012;29(2):397–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Russel WB. The dynamics of colloidal systems. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sarangapani PS, Hudson SD, Migler KB, Pathak JA. The limitations of an exclusively colloidal view of protein solution hydrodynamics and rheology. Biophys J. 2013;105(10):2418–26.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yadav S, Laue TM, Kalonia DS, Singh SN, Shire SJ. The influence of charge distribution on self-association and viscosity behavior of monoclonal antibody solutions. Mol Pharm. 2012;9(4):791–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Binabaji E, Rao S, Zydney AL. The osmotic pressure of highly concentrated monoclonal antibody solutions: effect of solution conditions. Biotech Bioeng. 2014;111(3):529–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Castellanos MM, Pathak JA, Colby RH. Both protein adsorption and aggregation contribute to shear yielding and viscosity increase in protein solutions. Soft Matter. 2014;10(1):122–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Connolly BD, Petry C, Yadav S, Demeule B, Ciaccio N, Moore JM, et al. Weak interactions govern the viscosity of concentrated antibody solutions: high-throughput analysis using the diffusion interaction parameter. Biophys J. 2012;103(1):69–78.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mooney M. The viscosity of a concentrated suspension of spherical particles. J Colloid Sci. 1951;6(2):162–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ross PD, Minton AP. Hard quasispherical model for the viscosity of hemoglobin solutions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1977;76(4):971–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bowen MN, Liu J, Patel AR. Compositions and methods useful for reducing the viscosity of protein-containing formulations. 2011;EP 2566510 A1.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arakawa T, Ejima D, Tsumoto K, Obeyama N, Tanaka Y, Kita Y, et al. Suppression of protein interactions by arginine: a proposed mechanism of the arginine effects. Biophys Chem. 2007;127(1–2):1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siddique J, Naqvi S. Viscosity behavior of α-amino acids in acetate salt solutions at temperatures (303.15 to 323.15) K. Int J Thermophys. 2012;33(1):47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heinen M, Zanini F, Roosen-Runge F, Fedunova D, Zhang F, Hennig M, et al. Viscosity and diffusion: crowding and salt effects in protein solutions. Soft Matter. 2012;8(5):1404–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vilker VL, Colton CK, Smith KA. The osmotic pressure of concentrated protein solutions: effect of concentration and pH in saline solutions of bovine serum albumin. J Colloid Interf Sci. 1981;79(2):548–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.AmgenThousand OaksUSA

Personalised recommendations