Advertisement

Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1947–1956 | Cite as

Polypeptide-based Micelles for Delivery of Irinotecan: Physicochemical and In vivo Characterization

  • Thiruganesh Ramasamy
  • Ju Yeon Choi
  • Hyuk Jun Cho
  • Subbaih Kandasamy Umadevi
  • Beom Soo Shin
  • Han-Gon Choi
  • Chul Soon Yong
  • Jong Oh Kim
Research Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Irinotecan (IRI) is a broad spectrum chemotherapeutic agent used individually or in combination to treat multiple malignancies. Present study aimed at developing polypeptide-based block ionomer complex (BIC) micelles to improve the pharmacokinetic and antitumor response of IRI.

Methods

Irinotecan-loaded BIC micelles (IRI-BIC) was prepared and evaluated in terms of various physicochemical and biological parameters including size, shape, release, cytotoxicity, and pharmacokinetic analysis. In vivo antitumor efficacy was investigated in SCC-7 bearing xenograft tumor model.

Results

IRI was successfully incorporated into the ionic cores of poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(aspartic acid) (PEG-b-PAA) with a high drug loading capacity (~80%). The electrostatically assembled BIC micelles were nanosized (~50 nm) with uniform size distribution pattern (PDI~0.1). The BIC micelles exhibited pH-sensitiveness with limited release of IRI at physiological conditions and significantly enhanced the release rate at acidic conditions, making it an ideal delivery system for tumor targeting. The IRI-BIC showed a dose-dependent cytotoxicity in SCC-7 and A-549 cancer cell lines. Pharmacokinetic studies clearly showed that BIC micelles improved the IRI blood circulation time and decreased its elimination rate constant, while that of free IRI, rapidly eliminated from the central compartment. Moreover, IRI-BIC showed superior therapeutic performance with no toxicity in BALB/c nude xenograft mice. The micelle treated group showed an inhibition rate of ~66% compared to free IRI treated group.

Conclusions

Taken together, BIC micelles could be a potentially useful nanovehicle with promising applicability in systemic tumor treatment.

KEY WORDS

anticancer block ionomer complex irinotecan polypeptide self-assembly 

ABBREVIATIONS

ABS

Acetate buffered saline

AUC

The area under the drug concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h

BIC

Block ionomer complex

Cl

Clearance

Cmax

The peak concentration of drug

DLS

Dynamic light scattering

EPR

Enhanced permeation and retention effect

FT-IR

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

IRI

Irinotecan

IRI-BIC

Irinotecan-loaded BIC

Kel

Elimination rate constant

MRT

Mean retention time

PBS

Phosphate buffered saline

PDI

Polydispersity index

PEG-b-PAA

Poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(aspartic acid)

t1/2

Half-life

TEM

Transmission electron microscope

Tmax

The time to reach the peak concentration

Vss

Volume of distribution

XRD

X-ray diffractometer

Notes

Acknowledgments and Disclosures

This research was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. 2012R1A2A2A02044997 and No.2012R1A1A1039059).

Supplementary material

11095_2014_1588_MOESM1_ESM.docx (57 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 56 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kunii R, Onishi H, Machida Y. Preparation and antitumor characteristics of PLA/(PEG-PPG-PEG) nanoparticles loaded with camptothecin. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2007;67:9–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang JA, Xuan T, Parmar M, Ma L, Ugwu S, Ali S, et al. Development and characterization of a novel liposome-based formulation of SN-38. Int J Pharm. 2004;270:93–107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ebrahimnejad P, Dinarvand R, Sajadi A, Jaafari MR, Nomani AR, Azizi E, et al. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of actively targetable nanoparticles for SN-38 delivery against HT-29 cell lines. Nanomedine Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2010;6:478–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang H, Wang J, Mao W, Huang J, Wu X, She Y, et al. Novel SN38 conjugate-forming nanoparticles as anticancer prodrug: In vitro and in vivo studies. J Control Release. 2013;166:147–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tobin P, Rivory L, Clarke S. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase in patients receiving irinotecan (camptothecin-11). Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;76:505–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bleiberg H. CPT-11 in gastrointestinal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:371–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang L, Cao DY, Wang J, Xiang B, Dun JN, Fang Y, et al. PEG coated irinotecan cationic liposomes improve the therapeutic efficacy of breast cancer in animals. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17:3347–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo S, Zhang X, Gan L, Zhu C, Gan Y. Effect of poly (ethylene oxide)-poly (propylene oxide)-poly (ethylene oxide) micelles on pharmacokinetics and intestinal toxicity of irinotecan hydrochloride: potential involvement of breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2). J Pharm Pharmacol. 2010;62:973–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsumura Y. Preclinical and clinical studies of NK012, an SN-38-incorporating polymeric micelles, which is designed based on EPR effect. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63:184–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sapra P, Zhao H, Mehlig M, Malaby J, Kraft P, Longley C, et al. Novel delivery of SN38 markedly inhibits tumor growth in xenografts, including a camptothecin-11—refractory model. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1888–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JO, Ramasamy T, Yong CS, Nukolova NV, Bronich TK, Kabanov AV. Cross-linked polymeric micelles based on block ionomer complexes. Mendeleev Commun. 2013;23:179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mishra D, Kang HC, Bae YH. Reconstitutable charged polymeric (PLGA)(2)-b-PEI micelle for gene therapeutics delivery. Biomaterials. 2011;32:3845–54.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Riess G. Micellization of block copolymers. Prog Polym Sci. 2003;28:1107–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maeda H. The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2001;41:189–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yokoyama M, Okano T, Sakurai Y, Fukushima S, Okamoto K, Kataoka K. Selective delivery of adriamycin to a solid tumor using a polymeric micelle carrier system. J Drug Target. 1997;7:171–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alakhov VY, Klinkski E, Li S, Pietrzynski G, Venne A, Batrakova E, et al. Block copolymer-based formulation of doxorubicin. From cell screen to clinical trials. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces. 1999;16:113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim JO, Kabanov AV, Bronich TK. Polymer micelles with cross-linked polyanion core for delivery of a cationic drug doxorubicin. J Control Release. 2009;138:197–204.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bronich TK, Popov AM, Eisenberg A, Kabanov VA, Kabanov AV. Effects of block length and structure of surfactant on self-assembly and solution behavior of block ionomer complexes. Langmuir. 2000;16:481–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oh KT, Bromberg L, Hatton TA, Kabanov AV. Block ionomer complexes as prospective nanocontainers for drug delivery. J Control Release. 2006;115:9–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tian Y, Bromberg L, Lin SN, Hatton TA, Tam KC. Complexation and release of doxorubicin from its complexes with Pluronic P85-b-poly(acrylic acid) block copolymers. J Control Release. 2007;121:137–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tian Y, Ravi P, Bromberg L, Hatton TA, Tam KC. Synthesis and aggregation behavior of Pluronic F87/poly(acrylic acid) block copolymer in the presence of doxorubicin. Langmuir. 2007;23:2638–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramasamy T, Kim J, Choi HG, Yong CS, Kim JO. Novel dual drug-loaded block ionomer complex micelles for enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapy treatments. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2014;10:1304–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ramasamy T, Khandasami US, Ruttala H, Shanmugam S. Development of solid lipid nanoparticles enriched hydrogels for topical delivery of anti-fungal agent. Macromol Res. 2012;20:682–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ramasamy TG, Haidar ZS. Characterization and cytocompatibility eval-uation of novel core–shell solid lipid nanoparticles for the controlled and tunable delivery of a model protein. J Bionanosci. 2012;5:143–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Silverstein RM, Bassler GC, Morrill TC. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds. 5th ed. NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1991. p. 91–142.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shu S, Zhang X, Teng D, Wang Z, Li C. Polyelectrolyte nanoparticles based on water-soluble chitosan–poly(l-aspartic acid)–polyethylene glycol for controlled protein release. Carbohydr Res. 2009;344:1197–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Blume A, Hubner W, Messner G. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of 13C = O-labeled phospholipids hydrogen bonding to carbonyl groups. Biochemist. 1988;27:8239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dicko A, Tardi P, Xie X, Mayer L. Role of copper gluconate/triethanolamine in irinotecan encapsulation inside the liposomes. Int J Pharm. 2007;337:219–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ramasamy T, Tran TH, Choi JY, Cho HJ, Kim JH, Yong CS, et al. Layer-by-layer coated lipid–polymer hybrid nanoparticles designed for use in anticancer drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;102:653–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Torchilin VP. PEG-based micelles as carriers of contrast agent for different imaging modalities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54:235–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Subedi RK, Kang KW, Choi HK. Preparation and characterization of solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with doxorubicin. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2009;37:508–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ramasamy T, Tran TH, Cho HJ, Kim JH, Kim Y, Jeon JY, et al. Chitosan-based polyelectrolyte complexes as potential nanoparticulate carriers: physicochemical and biological characterization. Pharm Res. 2014;31:1302–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu LF, Desai SD, Li TK, Mao Y, Sun M, Sim SP. Mechanism of action of camptothecin. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2000;922:1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhu S, Hong M, Tang G, Qian L, Lin J, Jiang Y, et al. Partly PEGylated polyamidoamine dendrimer for tumor-selective targeting of doxorubicin: The effects of PEGylation degree and drug conjugation style. Biomaterials. 2010;31:1360–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Assumpçao JU, Campos ML, Ferraz Nogueira Filho MA, Pestana KC, Baldan HM, FormarizPilon TP, et al. Biocompatible microemulsion modifies the pharmacokinetic profile and cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102:289–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee Y, Lee H, Kim YB, Kim J, Hyeon T, Park H, et al. Bioinspired surface immobilization of hyaluronic acid on monodisperse magnetite nanocrystals for targeted cancer imaging. Adv Mat. 2009;20:4154–7.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Parveen S, Sahoo SK. Long circulating chitosan/PEG blended PLGA nanoparticle for tumor drug delivery. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;670:372–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kim JY, Kim JK, Park JS, Byun Y, Kim CK. The use of PEGylated liposomes to prolong circulation life-times of tissue plasminogen activator. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5751–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kim JH, Kim YS, Park K, Lee S, Nam HY, Min KH, et al. Antitumor efficacy of cisplatin-loaded glycol chitosan nanoparticles in tumor-bearing mice. J Control Release. 2008;127:41–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mendoza AEH, Préat V, Mollinedo F, Blanco-Prieto MJ. In vitro and in vivo efficacy of edelfosine-loaded lipid nanoparticles against glioma. J Control Release. 2011;156:421–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thiruganesh Ramasamy
    • 1
  • Ju Yeon Choi
    • 1
  • Hyuk Jun Cho
    • 1
  • Subbaih Kandasamy Umadevi
    • 2
  • Beom Soo Shin
    • 3
  • Han-Gon Choi
    • 4
  • Chul Soon Yong
    • 1
  • Jong Oh Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.College of PharmacyYeungnam UniversityGyeongsanSouth Korea
  2. 2.St. Paul’s College of PharmacyOsmania UniversityHyderabadIndia
  3. 3.College of PharmacyCatholic University of DaeguGyeongsanSouth Korea
  4. 4.College of Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and TechnologyHanyang UniversitySangnok-guSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations