Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 30, Issue 7, pp 1758–1767 | Cite as

Surface Analysis of PEGylated Nano-Shields on Nanoparticles Installed by Hydrophobic Anchors

  • M. F. Ebbesen
  • B. Whitehead
  • B. Ballarin-Gonzalez
  • P. Kingshott
  • K. A. Howard
Research Paper

ABSTRACT

Purpose

This work describes a method for functionalisation of nanoparticle surfaces with hydrophilic “nano-shields” and the application of advanced surface characterisation to determine PEG amount and accumulation at the outmost 10 nm surface that is the predominant factor in determining protein and cellular interactions.

Methods

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles were prepared with a hydrophilic PEGylated “nano-shield” inserted at different levels by hydrophobic anchoring using either a phospholipid-PEG conjugate or the copolymer PLGA-block-PEG by an emulsification/diffusion method. Surface and bulk analysis was performed including X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and zeta potential. Cellular uptake was investigated in RAW 264.7 macrophages by flow cytometry.

Results

Sub-micron nanoparticles were formed and the combination of (NMR) and XPS revealed increasing PEG levels at the particle surface at higher PLGA-b-PEG copolymer levels. Reduced cellular interaction with RAW 264.7 cells was demonstrated that correlated with greater surface presentation of PEG.

Conclusion

This work demonstrates a versatile procedure for decorating nanoparticle surfaces with hydrophilic “nano-shields”. XPS in combination with NMR enabled precise determination of PEG at the outmost surface to predict and optimize the biological performance of nanoparticle-based drug delivery.

KEY WORDS

nanoparticles PEG stealth surface analysis XPS 

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Cartiera MS, Johnson KM, Rajendran V, Caplan MJ, Saltzman WM. The uptake and intracellular fate of PLGA nanoparticles in epithelial cells. Biomaterials. 2009;30(14):2790–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murakami H, Kobayashi M, Takeuchi H, Kawashima Y. Preparation of poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles by modified spontaneous emulsification solvent diffusion method. Int J Pharm. 1999;187(2):143–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walker KJ, Turkes AO, Turkes A, Zwink R, Beacock C, Buck AC, et al. Treatment of patients with advanced cancer of the prostate using a slow-release (depot) formulation of the LHRH agonist ICI 118630 (Zoladex®). J Endocrinol. 1984;103(2):R1–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kappy M, Stuart T, Perelman A, Clemons R. Suppression of gonatropin-secretion by a long-acting gonatropin-releasing hormone analog (Leuprolide acetate, Lupron depot) in children with precocious puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;69(5):1087–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Owens DE, Peppas NA. Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2006;307(1):93–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Betancourt T, Byrne JD, Sunaryo N, Crowder SW, Kadapakkam M, Patel S, et al. PEGylation strategies for active targeting of PLA/PLGA nanoparticles. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2009;91A(1):263–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meng FH, Engbers GHM, Feijen J. Polyethylene glycol-grafted polystyrene particles. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2004;70A(1):49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hermanson GT. Bioconjugate Techniques. Bioconjugate Techniques (Second Edition). 2 ed. New York: Academic Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wattendorf U, Merkle HP. PEGylation as a tool for the biomedical engineering of surface modified microparticles. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97(11):4655–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis SS, Illum L, Neal JC, Garnett MC, Stolnik S. Modification of the copolymers poloxamer 407 and poloxamine 908 can affect the physical and biological properties of surface modified nanospheres. Pharm Res. 1998;15(2):318–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamad I, Al-Hanbali O, Hunter AC, Rutt KJ, Andresen TL, Moghimi SM. Distinct polymer architecture mediates switching of complement activation pathways at the nanosphere-serum interface: implications for stealth nanoparticle engineering. ACS Nano. 2010;4(11):6629–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neal JC. In vitro displacement by rat serum of adsorbed radiolabeled poloxamer and poloxamine copolymers from model and biodegradable nanospheres. J Pharm Sci. 1998;87(10):1242–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Halperin A. Polymer brushes that resist adsorption of model proteins: â design parameters. Langmuir. 1999;15(7):2525–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Esmaeili F, Ghahremani MH, Esmaeili B, Khoshayand MR, Atyabi F, Dinarvand R. PLGA nanoparticles of different surface properties: preparation and evaluation of their body distribution. Int J Pharm. 2008;349(1–2):249–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan JM, Zhang L, Yuet KP, Liao G, Rhee J-W, Langer R, et al. PLGA-lecithin-PEG core-shell nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2009;30(8):1627–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Betancourt T, Shah K, Brannon-Peppas L. Rhodamine-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles for investigation of in vitro interactions with breast cancer cells. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2009;20(1):387–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fischer S, Foerg C, Ellenberger S, Merkle HP, Gander B. One-step preparation of polyelectrolyte-coated PLGA microparticles and their functionalization with model ligands. J Control Release. 2006;111(1–2):135–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu Y, Li K, Liu B, Feng S-S. A strategy for precision engineering of nanoparticles of biodegradable copolymers for quantitative control of targeted drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2010;31(35):9145–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farokhzad OC, Cheng JJ, Teply BA, Sherifi I, Jon S, Kantoff PW, et al. Targeted nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates for cancer chemotherapy in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(16):6315–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gref R, Minamitake Y, Peracchia MT, Trubetskoy V, Torchilin V, Langer R. Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. Science. 1994;263(5153):1600–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gref R, Minamitake Y, Peracchia M, Trubetskoy V, Torchilin V, Langer R. Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. Science. 1994;263(5153):1600–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andersen MO, Lichawska A, Arpanaei A, Jensen SMR, Kaur H, Oupicky D, et al. Surface functionalisation of PLGA nanoparticles for gene silencing. Biomaterials. 2010;31(21):5671–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Torchilin VP. Micellar nanocarriers: pharmaceutical perspectives. Pharm Res. 2007;24(1):1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang Y, Wang R, Lu X, Lu W, Zhang C, Liang W. Pegylated phospholipids-based self-assembly with water-soluble drugs. Pharm Res. 2010;27(2):361–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goodwin J. Colloids and Interfaces with Surfactants and Polymers: An Introduction. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shin S-B, Cho H-Y, Kim D-D, Choi H-G, Lee Y-B. Preparation and evaluation of tacrolimus-loaded nanoparticles for lymphatic delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010;74(2):164–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. F. Ebbesen
    • 1
  • B. Whitehead
    • 1
  • B. Ballarin-Gonzalez
    • 1
  • P. Kingshott
    • 2
  • K. A. Howard
    • 1
  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO) Department of Molecular Biology and GeneticsUniversity of AarhusAarhus CDenmark
  2. 2.Industrial Research Institute Swinburne (IRIS)Faculty of Engineering & Industrial SciencesSwinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia

Personalised recommendations