Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 2578–2586 | Cite as

Characterization of a Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery System Using Scanning Ion Occlusion Sensing

  • Lin YangEmail author
  • Murray F. Broom
  • Ian G. Tucker
Research Paper



To explore the application of scanning ion occlusion sensing (SIOS) as a novel technology for characterization of nanoparticles.


Liposomes were employed as model nanoparticles. The size distribution of the liposomes was measured by both SIOS and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Particle number concentration was determined based on particle translocation rate. The ability of SIOS and DLS to resolve bimodal samples was evaluated by measuring a mixture of 217 and 355 nm standard nanoparticles. Opsonization of liposomes by plasma was also studied using SIOS.


SIOS was shown to measure the size of different liposomes with higher sensitivity than DLS and it requires a smaller sample volume than DLS. With appropriate calibration, SIOS could be used to determine particle number concentrations. In comparison, SIOS analysis of the mixture showed accurate resolution of the population as a bimodal distribution over a wide range of number ratios of the particles. SIOS could detect plasma opsonization of liposomes by demonstrating a increase in particle size and also changes in the particle translocation rate.


SIOS is a useful technology for nanoparticle characterization. It shows some advantages over DLS and is clearly a useful tool for the study of nanoparticle drug delivery systems.


DLS liposomes nanoparticles opsonization SIOS 



The research was conducted during the tenure of a Health Sciences Career Development Award from the University of Otago to Lin Yang. The authors report no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Bootz A, Vogel V, Schubert D, Kreuter J. Comparison of scanning electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation for the sizing of poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;57:369–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krauel K, Girvan L, Hook S, Rades T. Characterisation of colloidal drug delivery systems from the naked eye to Cryo-FESEM. Micron. 2007;38:796–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Husain A, Hamielec AE, Vlachopoulos J. Particle size analysis using size exclusion chromatography. Size exclusion chromatography (GPC). Am Chem Soc. 1980;138:47–75.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xu X, Caswell KK, Tucker E, Kabisatpathy S, Brodhacker KL, Scrivens WA. Size and shape separation of gold nanoparticles with preparative gel electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1167:35–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu L. Application of ultrasound spectroscopy for nanoparticle sizing in high concentration suspensions: A factor analysis on the effects of concentration and frequency. Chem Eng Sci. 2009;64:5036–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Filipe V, Hawe A, Jiskoot W. Critical evaluation of nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the measurement of nanoparticles and protein aggregates. Pharm Res. 2010;27:796–810.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henriquez RR, Ito T, Sun L, Crooks RM. The resurgence of Coulter counting for analyzing nanoscale objects. Analyst. 2004;129:478–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sowerby SJ, Broom MF, Petersen GB. Dynamically resizable nanometre-scale apertures for molecular sensing. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2007;123:325–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Willmott GR, Moore PW. Reversible mechanical actuation of elastomeric nanopores. Nanotechnology. 2008;19:475504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Willmott GR, Vogel R, Yu SSC, Groenewegen LG, Roberts GS, Kozak D, et al. Use of tunable nanopore blockade rates to investigate colloidal dispersions. J Phys.: Condens Matter. 2010;22:454116.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vogel R, Willmott G, Kozak D, Roberts GS, Anderson W, Groenewegen L, et al. Quantitative sizing of nano/microparticles with a tunable elastomeric pore sensor. Anal Chem. 2011;83:3499–3506.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roberts GS, Kozak D, Anderson W, Broom MF, Vogel R, Trau M. Tunable nano/micropores for particle detection and discrimination: Scanning ion occlusion spectroscopy. Small. 2010;6:2653–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Torchilin VP. Recent advances with liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2005;4:145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kozak D, Anderson W, Vogel R, Trau M. Advances in resistive pulse sensors: devices bridging the void between molecular and microscopic detection. Nano Today. 2011;6:531–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mayer LD, Hope MJ, Cullis PR. Vesicles of variable sizes produced by a rapid extrusion procedure. BBA - Biomembranes. 1986;858:161–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunter DG, Frisken BJ. Effect of extrusion pressure and lipid properties on the size and polydispersity of lipid vesicles. Biophys J. 1998;74:2996–3002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shekunov BY, Chattopadhyay P, Tong HHY, Chow AHL. Particle size analysis in pharmaceutics: principles, methods and applications. Pharm Res. 2007;24:203–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roberts GS, Yu S, Zeng Q, Chan LCL, Anderson W, Colby AH, et al. Tunable pores for measuring concentrations of synthetic and biological nanoparticle dispersions. Biosens Bioelectron. 2012;31:17–25.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Epstein H, Afergan E, Moise T, Richter Y, Rudich Y, Golomb G. Number-concentration of nanoparticles in liposomal and polymeric multiparticulate preparations: empirical and calculation methods. Biomaterials. 2006;27:651–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tscharnuter W. Photon correlation spectroscopy in particle sizing. In: Meyers RA, editor. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2000. p. 5469–85.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frantzen CB, Ingebrigtsen L, Skar M, Brandl M. Assessing the accuracy of routine photon correlation spectroscopy analysis of heterogeneous size distributions. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003;4:62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karmali PP, Simberg D. Interactions of nanoparticles with plasma proteins: Implication on clearance and toxicity of drug delivery systems. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2011;8:343–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PharmacyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Private Bag 808 PictonMarlboroughNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations