Prediction of the Mechanical Behaviour of Crystalline Solids



To explore the use of crystal inter-planar d-spacings and slip-plane interaction energies for predicting and characterising mechanical properties of crystalline solids.


Potential relationships were evaluated between mechanical properties and inter-planar d-spacing, inter-planar interaction energy, and dispersive surface energy as determined using inverse gas chromatography (IGC) for a set of pharmaceutical materials. Inter-planar interaction energies were determined by molecular modelling.


General trends were observed between mechanical properties and the largest inter-planar d-spacing, inter-planar interaction energies, and IGC dispersive surface energy. A number of materials showed significant deviations from general trends. Weak correlations and outliers were rationalised.


Results suggest that the highest d-spacing of a material could serve as a first-order indicator for ranking mechanical behaviour of pharmaceutical powders, but with some reservation. Inter-planar interaction energy normalised for surface area shows only a weak link with mechanical properties and does not appear to capture essential physics of deformation. A novel framework linking mechanical properties of crystals to the distinct quantities, slip-plane energy barrier and inter-planar interaction (detachment) energy is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16


  1. 1.

    Hancock BC, Clas SD, Christensen K. Micro-scale measurement of the mechanical properties of compressed pharmaceutical powders. 1: the elasticity and fracture behaviour of microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm. 2000;209(1–2):27–35.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jain S. Mechanical properties of powders for compaction and tableting: an overview. PSTT 1999;2(1):20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sanchez-Castillo FX, Anwar J, Heyes DM. Molecular dynamics simulations of granular compaction. Chem Mater. 2003;15:3417–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Feng Y, Grant DJW. Influence of crystal structure on the compaction properties of n-Alkyl 4-Hydroxybenzoate esters (Parabens). Pharm Res. 2006;23(7):1608–16.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cottrell AH. The Mechanical Properties of Matter. London: Wiley; 1964. p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Morris KR, Griesser UJ, Eckhardt CJ, Stowell JG. Theoretical approach to physical transformations of active pharmaceutical ingredients during manufacturing processes. Adv Drug Dev Rev. 2001;48:95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sherwood JN. In: Sherwood Wiley JN, editor. The Plastically Crystalline State (Orientationally-disordered Crystals). Chichester, UK; 1979. p. 39.

  8. 8.

    Roberts RJ. The elasticity, ductility and fracture toughness of pharmaceutical powders. PhD Thesis, University of Bradford, UK. 1991.

  9. 9.

    Payne RS, Roberts RJ, Rowe RC, McPartlin M, Bashal A. The mechanical properties of two forms of primidone predicted from their crystal structures. Int J Pharm. 1996;145:165–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Roberts RJ, Rowe RC, York P. The relationship between indentation hardness of organic solids and their molecular structure. J Mater Sci. 1994;29:2289–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Day GM, Price SL, Leslie M. Elastic constant calculations for molecular organic crystals. Cryst Growth Design. 2001;1(1):13–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sun CC, Kiang YH. On the identification of slip planes in organic crystals based on attachment energy calculation. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97(8):3456–61.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Docherty R, Clydesdale G, Roberts KJ, Bennema P. Application of Bravais-Friedel-Donnay-Harker, attachment energy and Ising models to predicting and understanding the morphology of molecular crystals. J Phys D Appl Phys. 1991;24:89–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hartman P, Perdok WG. On the relations between structure and morphology of crystals. Acta Cryst. 1955;8(49):521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bennema P. On the crystallographic and statistical mechanical foundations of the forty-year old Hartman-Perdok theory. J Cryst Growth. 1996;166:17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Beyer T, Day GM, Price SL. The prediction, morphology and mechanical properties of the polymorphs of paracetamol. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:5086–94.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Allen FH. The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising. Acta Cryst. 2002;B58:380–8. doi:10.1107/S0108768102003890.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Maple JR, Hwang MJ, Stockfisch TP, Dinur U, Waldman M, Ewig CS, et al. Derivation of class II force fields. I. Methodology and quantum force field for the alkyl functional group and alkane molecules. J Comput Chem. 1994;15(2):162–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mayo SL, Olafson BD, William A, Goddard III. DREIDING: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem. 1990;94:8897–909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Donnay JDH, Harker D. A new law of crystal morphology extending the law of Bravais. Amer. Mineralogist. 1937;22:463.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wulff G. Zur Frage der Geschwindigkeit des Wachstums und der Auflösung der Krystallflächen. Zeitschrift für Krystallographie und Mineralogie. 1901;34:449–530.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Saxena A. A comparative study of the surface energetics of pharmaceutical excipients by inverse gas chromatography and molecular modelling. PhD Thesis, University of Bradford, UK. 2007.

  23. 23.

    Schultz J, Lavielle L. Interfacial properties of carbon fiber-epoxy matrix composites. In: Lloyds DR, Ward TC. ans Schreiber HP, editors. Inverse gas chromatography ACS Symposium Series 391, Washington, USA; 1989. p. 185–202.

  24. 24.

    Larsson I, Kristensen HG. Comminution of a brittle/ductile material in a micros ring mill. Powder Tech. 2000;107(1–2):175–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rowe RC, Roberts RJ. The mechanical properties of powders. In: Ganderton D, Jones T, McGinity J, editors. Advances in pharmaceutical sciences, vol. 7. London: Academic Press Limited; 1995. p. 1–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kendall K. The impossibility of comminuting small particles by compression. Nature. 1978;272:710–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mackerell AD Jr. Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: Overview and issues. J Comput Chem. 2004;25(13):1584–604.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chatchawalsaisin J, Kendrick J, Tuble SC, Anwar J. An optimized force field for crystalline phases of resorcinol. CrystEngComm. 2008;10(4):437–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tuble SC, Anwar J, Gale JD. An approach to developing a force field for molecular simulation of martensitic phase transitions between phases with subtle differences in energy and structure. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126(1):396–405.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Neumann MA, Leusen FJJ, Kendrick J. A major advance in crystal structure prediction. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47(13):2427–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hartman P. The attachment energy as a habit controlling factor II. Application to anthracene, tin tetraiodide and orthorhombic sulphur. J Cryst Growth. 1980;49:157–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Anwar J, Tuble SC, Kendrick J. Concerted molecular displacements in a thermally-induced solid-state transformation in crystals of DL-norleucine. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(9):2542–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamshed Anwar.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material S1

Experimental and optimised unit cell parameters for the materials examined using the CVFF (force field assigned charges) force field. Percentage deviations are shown in brackets. Deviations greater than 5% are shown in bold. (DOC 45 kb)

Supplementary Material S2

Experimental and optimised unit cell parameters for the materials examined using the Dreiding (Qeq charges) force field. Percentage deviations are shown in brackets. Deviations greater than 5% are shown in bold. (DOC 45 kb)

Supplementary Material S3

Experimental and optimised unit cell parameters for the materials examined using the Dreiding (Gasteiger charges) force field. Percentage deviations are shown in brackets. Deviations greater than 5% are shown in bold. (DOC 44 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shariare, M.H., Leusen, F.J.J., de Matas, M. et al. Prediction of the Mechanical Behaviour of Crystalline Solids. Pharm Res 29, 319–331 (2012).

Download citation


  • mechanical properties
  • particle deformation
  • slip plane
  • molecular modelling
  • inter-planar interaction energy