Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmaceutical Equivalence by Design for Generic Drugs: Modified-Release Products

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

The Office of Generic Drugs has ensured the high quality of generic products based upon two requirements: pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence to the reference listed drug (RLD). This paradigm has been used with success toward ensuring quality generic drug products that provide the same therapeutic benefit as the RLD. Drug products have increased in design complexity; as a result, approaches to ensure therapeutic equivalence must evolve to provide assurance of quality generic drug products. The Food and Drug Administration quality by design initiative (QbD) provides an enhanced evaluation approach by introducing the concept of a quality target product profile (QTPP). The QTPP introduces, within the context of the current regulatory framework, the quality concept of “pharmaceutical equivalence by design.” This article illustrates through several examples how this QbD element in the evaluation of modified-release drug products enhances the current framework to ensure generic drug product equivalence. It achieves this by complementing the traditional paradigm, “equivalence by testing,” where product equivalence is based upon inferences from a limited bioequivalence study, to one that also considers whether the drug product was developed to be an equivalent to the RLD, using appropriate quality surrogates that target “pharmaceutical equivalence by design.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Yu LX, Raw AS, Lionberger R, Rajagopalan R, Lee LM, Holcombe F, et al. US FDA question-based review for generic drugs: a new pharmaceutical quality assessment system. J Gen Med. 2007;4:239–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Woodcock J. The concept of pharmaceutical quality. American Pharmaceutical Review. 2004; Nov/Dec: 1–3.

  3. Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book) 2010, 30th Edition, pp. i–xx.

  4. FDA Guidance for Industry: ICH Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical Development; November 2009.

  5. Farinha A, Bica A, Pais JP, Toscano MC, Tavares P. Bioequivalence evaluation of two omeprazole formulations in humans. Eur J Pharm Sci. 1999;7:311–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaz-da-Siva M, Loureiro AI, Nunes T, Maia J, Tavares S, Falcao A, et al. Bioavailability and bioequivalence of two enteric-coated formulations of omeprazole in fasting and fed conditions. Clin Drug Investig. 2005;25(6):391–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elkoshi Z, Behr D, Mirimsky A, Tsvetkov I, Danon A. Multiple-dose studies can be a more sensitive assessment than single-dose studies: the case with omeprazole. Clin Drug Investig. 2002;22(9):585–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moore T, Smith A, Ye W, Te DY, Westenberger BJ, Lionberger R, et al. Generic omeprazole delayed release capsules: in-vitro performance evaluations. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2009;35(8):917–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Metadate CD® Label approved on April 16, 2009

  10. Concerta® Label approved on November 4, 2009

  11. Gonzalez MA, Pentikis HS, Anderl N, Benedict MF, DeCory HH, Dirksen SJH, et al. Methylphenidate bioavailability from two extended-release formulations. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;40(4):175–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Swanson JM, Wigal SB, Wigal T, Sonuga-Burke E, Greenhill LL, Biederman J, et al. A comparison of once-daily extended-release methylphenidate formulations in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the laboratory school (The Comac Study). Pediatrics. 2004;113(3):e206–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hendeles L, Wubbena P, Weinberger M. Food-induced dose dumping of a once-a day theophylline. Lancet. 1984;2:1471.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. FDA Guidance for Industry: Food-Effect Bioavailability and Fed Bioequivalence Studies; December 2002

  15. Meyer RJ, Hussain AS. Awareness topic: mitigating the risks of ethanol induced dose dumping from oral sustained/controlled release dosage forms, FDA’s advisory committee for pharmaceutical sciences meeting; October 2005.

  16. Safety Alerts for Human Medical Products (Fentanyl transdermal System CII Patches); 2008 April 19. Available from http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts

  17. Marier JF, Lor M, Morin J, Roux L, Di Marco M, Morelli G, et al. Comparative bioequivalence study between a novel matrix transdermal delivery system of fentanyl and a commercially available reservoir information. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;63(1):121–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu LX. Pharmaceutical quality by design: product and process development, understanding, and control. Pharm Res. 2008;25:781–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lionberger R, Lee SL, Lee LM, Raw AS, Yu LX. Quality by design: concepts for ANDAs. AAPS J. 2008;10(2):268–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen ML, Lee VHL. Equivalence-by-design: targeting in-vivo drug delivery profile. Pharm Res. 2008;25(12):2723–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Draft Guidance for Industry: Bioequivalence Recommendations for Specific Products: Zolpidem Tablet Extended Release Tablets; August 2008

  22. Letter to Richard Gural (Sanofi-Aventis) from Janet Woodcock FDA in response to Citizen Petition: 2007-P-0182; 2010 October 13. Available from www.regulations.gov

  23. Draft Guidance for Industry: Bioequivalence Recommendations for Specific Products: Tramadol Tablet Extended Release Tablets; November 2007

  24. Draft Guidance for Industry: Residual Drug in Transdermal and Related Drug Delivery Systems; August 2010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Sirota Raw.

Additional information

The views presented in this article do not necessarily reflect those of the Food and Drug Administration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raw, A.S., Lionberger, R. & Yu, L.X. Pharmaceutical Equivalence by Design for Generic Drugs: Modified-Release Products. Pharm Res 28, 1445–1453 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0397-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0397-6

KEY WORDS

Navigation