Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transfer of the “Assay” and “Dissolution” Methods: Comparative Testing and Acceptance Criteria (Review)

  • STRUCTURE OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS, METHODS OF ANALYSIS AND PROCESS CONTROL
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal Aims and scope

Transfer of the “Assay” and “Dissolution” analytical methods in most cases is used in comparative testing of samples. A number of practically important question remain relevant. This article addresses comparative testing of samples with transfer of these methods. Potential acceptance criteria – requirements for acceptable difference between results from the sending and receiving laboratories – are presented. Computational formulas for the TOST test are discussed. Data and guidelines important for increasing the reliability of transfer of the “Assay” and “Dissolution” analytical methods are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. A. Épshtein, Razrabot. Registrats. Lek. Sredstv., 10(2), 137 – 146 (2021) 1033380/2305-2066-2021-10-2-137-146.

  2. Good Practice Guide: Technology Transfer, ISPE (2018) ; 3rd Edition; https://ispeorg/publications/guidance-documents/good-practice-guide-technology-transfer-3rd-edition.

  3. World Health Organization, WHO Technical Report Series, No. 961, Annex 7 (2011) ; https://wwwacademiaedu/29872380/Annex_7_WHO_guidelines_on_transfer_of_technology_in_pharmaceutical_manufacturing.

  4. Guidelines for Transfer of Technology and / or Analytical Methods in the Manufacture of Medicines, Addendum No. 6, EAÉS (2021) ; https://ruscribdcom/document/5172658/Guideline-for-the-transfer-of-analytical-test-procedures.

  5. Method Validation in Pharmaceutical Analysis A Guide to Best Practice, J. Ermer and P. W. Nethercote (eds.), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, Weinheim, Germany (2014), 2nd edition.

  6. Guidelines & Codes. Guideline for the Transfer of Analytical Test Procedures (2007) https://ruscribdcom/document/5172658/Guideline-for-the-transfer-of-analytical-test-procedures.

  7. HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists, M. Dong (ed.), Wiley (2019), 2nd edition.

  8. United States Pharmacopoeia, USP41-NF36 (2018).

  9. M. A. Al-Kamarany, M. El Karbane, K. Ridouan, et al., Saudi Pharm. J., 20(1), 93 – 101 (2012) ; 10.1016/j-jsps.2011.08.006

  10. European Pharmacopoeia, 95th Ed., Chapter 2246, Chromatographic Separation Techniques, EDQM, Strasbourg (2018).

  11. I. E. Shokhin, N. S. Bagaeva, E. A. Malashenko, and V. N. Kuzina, Razrabot. Registrats. Lek. Sredstv., 9(2), 145 – 150 (2020) ; 1033380/2305-2066-2020-9-2-145-150.

  12. A Test for Comparative Dissolution Kinetics and the Comparability of Dissolution Profiles in the ‘Regulations for Studies of Bioequivalence of Medicines in the Context of the Eurasian Economic Union [in Russian], Addendum No. 5, Eurasian Economic Union, Astana (2016) ; https://docscntdru/document/456026107

  13. U. Schepers and H. Wätzig, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 39, 310 – 314 (2005) ; 101016/jjpba200503015.

  14. L. Kaminski, U. Schepers, and H. Wätzig, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 53, 1124 – 1129 (2010); 101016/j.jpba.2010.04.034

  15. J. Ermer, M. Limberger, K. Lis, and H. Wätzig, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 85, 262 – 276 (2013) ; 01016/j.jpba.2013.07.009

  16. State Pharmacopeia of the Russian Federation [in Russian], Moscow (2018), XIV edition, Vol. 1, pp. 867 – 871; http://fembru/femb/pharmacopeaphp.

  17. N. A. Épshtein, Khim.-Farm. Zh., 53(12), 48 – 57 (2019); 1030906/0023-1134-2019-53-12-48-57; Pharm. Chem. J., 53(12), 1174-1183 (2020) ; 101007/s11094-020-02143-9.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Épshtein.

Additional information

Translated from Khimiko-Farmatsevticheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 39 – 43, January, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Épshtein, N.A. Transfer of the “Assay” and “Dissolution” Methods: Comparative Testing and Acceptance Criteria (Review). Pharm Chem J 56, 105–109 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-022-02608-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-022-02608-z

Keywords

Navigation