Transfer of the “Assay” and “Dissolution” analytical methods in most cases is used in comparative testing of samples. A number of practically important question remain relevant. This article addresses comparative testing of samples with transfer of these methods. Potential acceptance criteria – requirements for acceptable difference between results from the sending and receiving laboratories – are presented. Computational formulas for the TOST test are discussed. Data and guidelines important for increasing the reliability of transfer of the “Assay” and “Dissolution” analytical methods are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. A. Épshtein, Razrabot. Registrats. Lek. Sredstv., 10(2), 137 – 146 (2021) 1033380/2305-2066-2021-10-2-137-146.
Good Practice Guide: Technology Transfer, ISPE (2018) ; 3rd Edition; https://ispeorg/publications/guidance-documents/good-practice-guide-technology-transfer-3rd-edition.
World Health Organization, WHO Technical Report Series, No. 961, Annex 7 (2011) ; https://wwwacademiaedu/29872380/Annex_7_WHO_guidelines_on_transfer_of_technology_in_pharmaceutical_manufacturing.
Guidelines for Transfer of Technology and / or Analytical Methods in the Manufacture of Medicines, Addendum No. 6, EAÉS (2021) ; https://ruscribdcom/document/5172658/Guideline-for-the-transfer-of-analytical-test-procedures.
Method Validation in Pharmaceutical Analysis A Guide to Best Practice, J. Ermer and P. W. Nethercote (eds.), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, Weinheim, Germany (2014), 2nd edition.
Guidelines & Codes. Guideline for the Transfer of Analytical Test Procedures (2007) https://ruscribdcom/document/5172658/Guideline-for-the-transfer-of-analytical-test-procedures.
HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists, M. Dong (ed.), Wiley (2019), 2nd edition.
United States Pharmacopoeia, USP41-NF36 (2018).
M. A. Al-Kamarany, M. El Karbane, K. Ridouan, et al., Saudi Pharm. J., 20(1), 93 – 101 (2012) ; 10.1016/j-jsps.2011.08.006
European Pharmacopoeia, 95th Ed., Chapter 2246, Chromatographic Separation Techniques, EDQM, Strasbourg (2018).
I. E. Shokhin, N. S. Bagaeva, E. A. Malashenko, and V. N. Kuzina, Razrabot. Registrats. Lek. Sredstv., 9(2), 145 – 150 (2020) ; 1033380/2305-2066-2020-9-2-145-150.
A Test for Comparative Dissolution Kinetics and the Comparability of Dissolution Profiles in the ‘Regulations for Studies of Bioequivalence of Medicines in the Context of the Eurasian Economic Union [in Russian], Addendum No. 5, Eurasian Economic Union, Astana (2016) ; https://docscntdru/document/456026107
U. Schepers and H. Wätzig, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 39, 310 – 314 (2005) ; 101016/jjpba200503015.
L. Kaminski, U. Schepers, and H. Wätzig, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 53, 1124 – 1129 (2010); 101016/j.jpba.2010.04.034
J. Ermer, M. Limberger, K. Lis, and H. Wätzig, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 85, 262 – 276 (2013) ; 01016/j.jpba.2013.07.009
State Pharmacopeia of the Russian Federation [in Russian], Moscow (2018), XIV edition, Vol. 1, pp. 867 – 871; http://fembru/femb/pharmacopeaphp.
N. A. Épshtein, Khim.-Farm. Zh., 53(12), 48 – 57 (2019); 1030906/0023-1134-2019-53-12-48-57; Pharm. Chem. J., 53(12), 1174-1183 (2020) ; 101007/s11094-020-02143-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Khimiko-Farmatsevticheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 39 – 43, January, 2022.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Épshtein, N.A. Transfer of the “Assay” and “Dissolution” Methods: Comparative Testing and Acceptance Criteria (Review). Pharm Chem J 56, 105–109 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-022-02608-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-022-02608-z