Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the Compatibility of Moxifloxacin with Selected Excipients Used in the Formulation of Nanopharmaceuticals

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal Aims and scope

Drug excipients are chemical substances that can interact with each other and with APIs, thus affecting characteristics of the final dosage form. Selection of excipients for the preparation of nanopharmaceuticals is very critical because there are more chances of physical and chemical interactions. The current study was carried out to investigate the possibility of any chemical or physical interaction between moxifloxacin hydrochloride and selected excipients (polymers and surfactants) used in the formulation of polymeric nanoparticles. Samples were prepared using the binary mixture approach and then stored under stress conditions (40 ± 2°C and 75 ± 5% RH) for 90 days. The compatibility studies were carried out by visual observations, HPLC-UV, XRD and FTIR analysis. No visual changes were observed in any of the samples, drug content of the samples was within the range of 98 – 100.37%. FTIR spectra remained unaffected, and all the characteristic XRD peaks were present which indicated that the drug was compatible with the excipients used. The results of this investigation confirm that moxifloxacin hydrochloride is compatible with the selected excipients, and the polymeric drug nanoparticles can be formulated without any stability issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. M. Jans, F. R. Kiekens, J. F. Voorspoels, et al., Pharmaceutical Dosage Form, US Patents; (2017).

  2. N. Fathima, T. Mamatha, H. K. Qureshi, et al., J. Appl. Pharm. Sci., 1, 66 – 71 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Ahuja and S. Scypinski, Handbook of Modern Pharmaceutical Analysis, Academic Press: San Diego (2001), Vol. 3, pp. 174 – 227.

  4. M. Kar, Y. Chourasiya, R. Maheshwari, and R. K. Tekade, Basic Fundamentals of Drug Delivery, Academic Press, San Diego (2019), pp. 29 – 83.

  5. F. M McDaid, S. A. Barker, S. Fitzpatrick, et al., Int. J. Pharm., 252, 235 – 40 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. S. Canbay and M. Doganturk, Eurasian J. Ana. Chem., 13, 1 – 7 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Gorain, H. Choudhury, M. Pandey, et al., in: Dosage Form Design Parameters, R. K. Tekade (Ed.) Elsevier Science, New York (2018), pp. 363 – 402.

  8. E. A. Schmitt, K. Peck, Y. Sun, and J. M. Geoffroy, Thermochim. Acta., 380, 175 – 84 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Fathima, T. Mamatha, H. K. Qureshi, et al., J. Appl. Pharm. Sci.,1, 66 – 71 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Z. Benet, V. Bhatia, P. Singh, et al., J. Pharm. Sci., 55, 63 – 8 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Sabnis, P. Rege and L. H. Block, Pharm. Dev. Technol., 2, 243 – 255 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Li and Y. Wu, Lubricants, 2, 21 – 43 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Ullah, Z. Iqbal, A. Khan, and A. Ullah, Lat. Am. J. Pharm., 39, 73 – 78(2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Chadha and S. Bhandari, J. Pharm. Biomed., 87, 82 – 97 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Liltorp, T. G. Larsen, B. Willumsen, and R. Holm, J. Pharm. Biomed., 55, 424 – 428 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. F. U. Khan, F. Nasir, Z. Iqbal, et al., J. Chromatogr. B, 1017, 120 – 128 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. K. Tekade, R. Maheshwari, N. Soni, et al., in: Nanotechnology-Based Approaches for Targeting and Delivery of Drugs and Genes, Edited by V. Mishra, P. Kesharwani, et al., Elsevier: New York (2017), pp. 3 – 61.

  18. P. Sharma, R. Maheshwari, M. Tekade and R. K Tekade, Curr. Pharm. Des., 21, 4465 – 4478 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Maheshwari, M. Tekade, A. P. Sharma, et al., Curr. Pharm. Des., 21, 4427 – 4440 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. A. Agnihotri, N. N. Mallikarjuna and T. M. Aminabhavi, J. Control. Release., 100, 5 – 28 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. N. Pani, L. Nath and S. Acharya, Acta. Pharm., 61, 237 – 247(2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Mohamed, A. M. Abd-Motagaly, O. A. Ahmed, et al., Pharmaceutics, 9, 1 – 13 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. C. Qiao, X. Ma, and Y. Liu, Int. J. Pharm., 294, 103 – 112 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the Department of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar, Peshawar and Ferozsons Laboratories Ltd. (Pakistan) for providing research facilities.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fahim Ullah Khan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, F.U., Nasir, F., Hassan, M. et al. Evaluation of the Compatibility of Moxifloxacin with Selected Excipients Used in the Formulation of Nanopharmaceuticals. Pharm Chem J 55, 1184–1189 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-022-02556-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-022-02556-8

Keywords

Navigation