Abstract
The Bracken School Readiness Assessment (BSRA) has been used in large studies such as the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS). Important conclusions might be done regarding its reliability for the prediction of children’s school readiness taking advantage of such large-scale evaluation. Although BSRA has being largely used, few are the studies at item-level under latent approach investigating its psychometric features. Using data from 14,899 2–3-year olds who participated in the MCS, we used Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis to examine multidimensionality of the subtests of the BSRA and their consistencies, specificities, and reliabilities. We found clear indications of multidimensionality. From the 88 items, 10 showed low reliability. Future research may consider excluding these low reliability items to improve the psychometric properties of the BSRA and its use as multidimensional measurement tool.



Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data used in this investigation are available at https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/help/get-in-touch. More information about the Millennium Cohort Study can be found at https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/cls-studies/millennium-cohort-study/
References
Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2010). Bayesian Analysis of Latent Variable Models using Mplus. https://www.statmodel.com/download/BayesAdvantages18.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2019.
Bandalos, D. L. (2018). Measurement Theory and Applications for the Social Sciences. New York: Guilford Press.
Bassiouni, D. H., & Hackley, C. (2014). “Generation Z” children’s adaptation to digital consumer culture: a critica...: LIBRARY PLUS - for books, articles and more. Journal of Customer Behaviour.
Bracken, B. A. (2002). Bracken School Readiness Assessment: administration manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Bracken, B. A. (2007). Examiner's Manual: Bracken School Readiness Assessment - 3rd Edition.
Bracken, B. A., & Crawford, E. (2010). Basic concepts in early childhood educational standards: a 50-state review. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0363-7.
Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for applied reserach. (T. G. Press, Ed.) New York, NY.
Centre for Longitudinal Studies. (2001). Available at Millenium Cohort Study: https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/. Accessed March 2008.
Claessens, A., Duncan, G., & Engel, M. (2009). Kindergarten skills and fifth-grade achievement: evidence from the ECLS-K. Economics of Education Review, 28(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.09.003.
Eid, M., Geiser, C., Koch, T., & Heene, M. (2017). Anomalous results in G -factor models: explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000083.
Eid, M., Krumm, S., Koch, T., & Schulze, J. (2018). Bifactor models for predicting criteria by general and specific factors: Problems of nonidentifiability and alternative solutions. Journal of Intelligence, 6, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6030042.
Gelman, A. (2013). Two simple examples for understanding posterior p-values whose distributions are far from uniform. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 7, 2595–2602.
Hair PhD, N. L., Hanson PhD, J. L., Wolfe PhD, B. L., & Pollak PhD, S. D. (2015). Association of child poverty, brain development, and academic achievement. JAMA Pediatrics.
Hansen, K., Johnson , J., Joshi, H., Calderwood, L., Jones, E., McDonald, J., . . . Smith, K. (2014). Millenium cohort study - first, second, third and fourth surveys - a guide to the datasets (8th Edition). https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/MCS-Guide-to-the-Datasets-022014pdf.
Heckman, J. J., Moon, S. H., Pinto, R., Savelyev, P. A., & Yavitz, A. (2010). The rate of return to the HighScope Perry Preschool Program. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.001.
Heinrich, K., Zagorscak, P., Eid, M. & Knaevelsrud, C. (in press). Giving G a meaning: An application of the bifactor(s-1) approach to realize a more symptom-oriented modeling of the Beck Depression Inventory II. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118803738.
Holman, R., & Glas, C. A. (2005). Modelling non-ignorable missing-data mechanisms with item response theory models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 58(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711005X47168.
Köhler, C., Pohl, S., & Carstensen, C. H. (2017). Dealing with item nonresponse in large-scale cognitive assessments: The impact of missing data methods on estimated explanatory relationships. Paper accepted for publication in the Journal of Educational Measurement, 54(4), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12154.
Lee, J. S., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2007). Preschool teachers’ beliefs about appropriate early literacy and mathematics education for low- and middle-socioeconomic status children. Early Education and Development, 18, 111–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280701274758.
Magnuson, K. A., Meyers, M. K., Ruhm, C. J., & Waldfogel, J. (2004). Inequality in preschool education and school readiness. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 115–157. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041001115.
Muthen, B. (2010). Bayesian Analysis In Mplus: A Brief Introduction. https://www.statmodel.com/download/IntroBayesVersion%203.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019.
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2010). Mplus (6th ed.). Los Angeles. CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Muthén, L.K. and Muthén, B.O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. Eighth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
O’Muircheartaigh, C., & Moustaki, I. (1999). Symmetric pattern models: A latent variable approach to item non-response in attitude scales. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A: Statistics in Society, 162, 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00129.
Panter, J. E., & Bracken, B. A. (2009). Validity of the Bracken School Readiness Assessment for predicting first grade readiness. Psychology in the Schools, 46(5), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20385.
Pentimonti, J. M., Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2014). School-readiness profiles of children with language impairment: linkages to home and classroom experiences. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49(5), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12094.
Pohl, S., Gräfe, L., & Rose, N. (2014). Dealing with omitted and not-reached items in competence tests: evaluating approaches accounting for missing responses in item response theory models. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413504926.
Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (2004). Early learning and school readiness: can early intervention make a difference? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2004.0034.
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z: educating and engaging the next generation of students. About Campus, 22, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21293.
Shah, M. B., Schaefer, B. A., & Clark, T. P. (2013). Reliability of bracken school readiness assessment, third edition scores with young children in Mumbai India. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 1(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2013.782595.
Snow, K. L. (2006). Measuring school readiness: conceptual and practical considerations. Early Education and Development, 17(1), 7–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1701_2.
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology, 64, 583–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353.
United Nations. (2015). Sustainable development goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/.
Van Hartingsveldt, M. J., Cup, E. H. C., Hendriks, J. C. M., de Vries, L., de Groot, I. J. M., & Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G. (2015). Predictive validity of kindergarten assessments on handwriting readiness. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.014.
Wolf, S., Halpin, P., Yoshikawa, H., Dowd, A. J., Pisani, L., & Borisova, I. (2017). Measuring school readiness globally: assessing the construct validity and measurement invariance of the International Development and Early Learning Assessment (IDELA) in Ethiopia. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 41, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.05.001.
Funding
We would like to thank FAPESP (Sao Paulo Research Foundation, SPRINT Process 2016/50195-0) and the CAPES Thesis Award (N° 0374/2016. Process N° 23038.009191/2013-76).
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.
HCM would like to express his gratitude to the Senior Researcher CAPES-Alexander von Humboldt Post-Doc Fellowship (Process number 88881.145593/2017-01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DAM, PMMO, and HCM prepared the manuscript. DAM reviewed the literature. DAM and HCM carried out the analyses. SP, ME, and HCM conduct the analyses and its theoretical aspects in the discussion. TL is a specialist in school readiness and added knowledge in the background and methods. MLP and GP contributed with the revision of the paper and theoretical aspects in the discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(XLSX 64 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Almeida Maia, D., Pohl, S., Okuda, P.M.M. et al. Psychometric properties and optimizing of the Bracken School Readiness Assessment. Educ Asse Eval Acc 34, 227–239 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09339-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09339-3


