Teacher assessment literacy: a review of international standards and measures


Assessment literacy is a core professional requirement across educational systems. Hence, measuring and supporting teachers’ assessment literacy have been a primary focus over the past two decades. At present, there are a multitude of assessment standards across the world and numerous assessment literacy measures that represent different conceptions of assessment literacy. The purpose of this research is to (a) analyze assessment literacy standards from five English-speaking countries (i.e., Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK, and USA) plus mainland Europe to understand shifts in the assessment landscape over time and across regions and (b) analyze prominent assessment literacy measures developed after 1990. Through a thematic analysis of 15 assessment standards and an examination of eight assessment literacy measures, results indicate noticeable shifts in standards over time yet the majority of measures continue to be based on early conceptions of assessment literacy. Results also serve to define the multiple dimensions of assessment literacy and yield important recommendations for measuring teacher assessment literacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. America Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Retrieved from http://www.teststandards.org/.

  2. American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association. (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Washington: National Council on Measurement in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: research-based principles to guide classroom practice. UK: University of Cambridge, Assessment Reform Group.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Assessment Reform Group. (2008). Changing assessment practices: Process, principles and standards. Retrieved from http://www.aaia.org.uk/content/uploads/2010/06/ARIA-Changing-Assessment-Practice-Pamphlet-Final.pdf.

  5. Association for Educational Assessment-Europe. (2012). European framework of standards for educational assessment 1.0. Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Certification Authorities. (1995). Guidelines for assessment quality and equity. Retrieved from http://acaca.bos.nsw.edu.au/files/pdf/guidelines.pdf.

  7. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, adolescence and education (pp. 307–337). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Birenbaum, M., DeLuca, C., Earl, L., Heritage, M., Klenowski, V., Looney, A., Smith, K., Timperley, H., Volante, L., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2015). International trends in the implementation of assessment: implications for policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education.

  9. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Granada Learning.

  10. Bowen, G. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Braney, B.T. (2010). An examination of fourth grade teachers’ assessment literacy and its relationship to students’ reading achievement. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3434570).

  12. Brookhart, S. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell, C., Murphy, J. A., & Holt, J. K. (2002). Psychometric analysis of an assessment literacy instrument: applicability to pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus.

  14. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Daniel, L. G., & King, D. A. (1998). Knowledge and use of testing and measurement literacy of elementary and secondary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(6), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. DeLuca, C. (2012). Preparing teachers for the age of accountability: toward a framework for assessment education. Teacher Education Yearbook XXI: A Special Issue of Action in Teacher Education, 34(5/6), 576–591.

  17. DeLuca, C., & Bellara, A. (2013). The current state of assessment education: aligning policy, standards, and teacher education curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 356–372.

  18. DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. A. (2010). Assessment literacy development: identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, 419–438.

  19. Department for Education-United Kingdom. (2012). Teachers’ standards. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/reviewofstandards/a00205581/teachers-standards1-sep-2012.

  20. Department of Education-Australia. (2012). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.teacherstandards.aitsl.edu.au/OrganisationStandards/Organisation.

  21. Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Galluzzo, G. R. (2005). Performance assessment and renewing teacher education. Clearing House, 78(4), 142–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gardner, J. (2006). Assessment for learning: a compelling conceptualization. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 197–204). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gotch, C. M., & French, B. F. (2014). A systematic review of assessment literacy measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33, 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gullickson, A. R. (1984). Teacher perspectives of their instructional use of tests. The Journal of Educational Research, 77(4), 244–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. National Council on Measurement in Education (1995). Code of professional responsibilities in educational measurement. Retrieved from: http://www.natd.org/Code_of_Professional_Responsibilities.html.

  27. International Symposium for Classroom Assessment (ISCA). (n.d.). History 2001 - Assessment for learning: international perspectives. Retrieved from: https://a4larchive.wordpress.com/about-2/history-2001/.

  28. Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC). (2011). InTASC model core teaching standards: a resource for state dialogue. Washington: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Publications/InTASC_Model_Core_Teaching_Standards_A_Resource_for_State_Dialogue_(April_2011).html.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jarr, K.A. (2012). Education practitioners’ interpretation and use of assessment results. University of Iowa. Retrieved from http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/3317.

  30. Joint Advisory Committee. (1993). Principles for fair student assessment practices for education in Canada. Retrieved from http://www2.education.ualberta.ca/educ/psych/crame/files/eng_prin.pdf.

  31. Joint Committee for Standards on Educational Evaluation. (2015). Classroom assessment standards: practices for PK-12 teachers. Retrieved from http://www.teach.purdue.edu/pcc/DOCS/Minutes/12-15_Handouts/2013-0116/JCSSE_Assessment_Standards.pdf.

  32. Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kershaw IV, I. (1993). Ohio vocational education teachers’ perceived use of student assessment information in educational decision-making. Ohio State University.

  34. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback intervention on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (1996). Educational testing and measurement: classroom application and practice (5th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  36. MacLellan, E. (2004). Initial knowledge states about assessment: novice teachers’ conceptualizations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 523–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mertler, C.A. (2003). Pre-service versus in-service teachers’ assessment literacy: does classroom experience make a difference? In Annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus.

  38. Mertler, C. A. (2009). Teachers’ assessment knowledge and their perceptions of the impact of classroom assessment professional development. Improving Schools, 12(2), 101–113. doi:10.1177/1365480209105575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mertler, C.A., & Campbell, C. (2005). Measuring teachers’ knowledge & application of classroom assessment concepts: development of the assessment literacy inventory. In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.

  40. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  41. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2001). What teachers should know and be able to do. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/sites/default/files/documents/certificates/what_teachers_should_know.pdf.

  42. National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (2008). Professional standards for the accreditation of teacher preparation institutions. Retrieved from: http://www.ncate.org/public/standards.asp.

  43. Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22(2), 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. New Zealand Teachers Council. (2008). Graduating teacher standards. Retrieved from http://www.teacherscouncil.co.nz/.

  45. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand OaksCA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Plake, B., Impara, J., & Fager, J. (1993). Assessment competencies of teachers: a national survey. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 10–39. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00548.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston: Allyn-Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Popham, W. J. (2004). Why assessment illiteracy is professional suicide. Educational Leadership, 62, 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Popham, W. J. (2013). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stiggins, R. (2002). Assessment crisis: the absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 758–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Stiggins, R. (2004). New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literacy: implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30, 749–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wiliam, D. (2007). Content then process: teacher learning communities in the service of formative assessment. In D. B. Reeves (Ed.), Ahead of the curve: the power of assessment to transform teaching and learning (pp. 183–204).

  54. Willis, J. (2010). Assessment for learning as a participatory pedagogy. Assessment Matters, 2, 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang, Z., & Burry-stock, J.A. (1997). Assessment practices inventory: a multivariate analysis of teachers’ perceived assessment competency. In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  56. Zhang, Z., & Burry-stock, J. A. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers’ self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher DeLuca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D. & Luhanga, U. Teacher assessment literacy: a review of international standards and measures. Educ Asse Eval Acc 28, 251–272 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9233-6

Download citation


  • Assessment
  • Measurement
  • Assessment literacy
  • Teacher knowledge
  • Assessment competency
  • Assessment standards