Advertisement

Navigating dilemmas in transforming assessment practices: experiences of mathematics teachers in Ontario, Canada

  • Christine Suurtamm
  • Martha J. Koch
Article

Abstract

Current thinking encourages teachers to incorporate a range of assessment practices that are responsive to student thinking and promote student learning. At the same time, teachers are situated in a landscape of accountability, where they are often seen as technicians who implement prescribed curriculum, policies, and procedures with success measured by externally created assessments. This paper considers how teachers navigate this difficult terrain as they incorporate new assessment practices in their classrooms. We report on a two-year project undertaken with 42 teachers of mathematics (Grades 4–12) in Ontario, Canada. Using an analytic framework adapted from Windschitl (Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.2002), we explore the dilemmas these teachers identified as they met in communities of practice. Our findings highlight the need for coherence in the assessment messages communicated to teachers and provide evidence of the critical role of ongoing collaboration and dialogue to support the development of teachers’ professional judgement and enable change in their assessment practice.

Keywords

Classroom assessment Dilemmas in practice Assessment reform Teacher practice Mathematics education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) who provided an infrastructure grant for the research facilities (Pi Lab) used in this project. The second author would also like to acknowledge the financial support she received from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Most importantly, we wish to acknowledge the dedication and commitment of the research project participants, without whom this work would not have been possible.

References

  1. Adler, J. (1998). A language of teaching dilemmas: unlocking the complex multilingual secondary mathematics classroom. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 24–33.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L. (Ed.). (2003). Mathematical proficiency for all students: toward a strategic research and development program in mathematics education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND InstituteGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5(1), 7–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: education, knowledge, and action research. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  6. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, A. R. (1998). Assessment of complex performances: limitations of key measurement assumptions. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  9. Earl, L. M., Volante, L., & Katz, S. (2011). Unleashing the promise of assessment for learning. Education Canada, 51.Google Scholar
  10. Forman, E. A. (2003). A sociocultural approach to mathematics reform: speaking, inscribing, and doing mathematics within communities of practice. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 333–352). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  11. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gardner, J. (Ed.) (2006). Assessment and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Gearhart, M., & Saxe, G. B. (2004). When teachers know what students know: integrating mathematics assessment. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gipps, C. V. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graue, M. E., & Smith, S. Z. (1996). Shaping assessment through instructional innovation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(2), 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: teachers work and culture in a postmodern age. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  17. Hargreaves, A. (2009). A decade of educational change and a defining moment of opportunity—an introduction. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. J. (2012). Professional capital: transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kincheloe, J. L. (2003). Teachers as researchers: qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  21. Lachance, A., & Confrey, J. (2003). Interconnecting content and community: a qualitative study of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(2), 107–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, D. H. L., & Shaari, I. (2012). Professional identity or best practices? An exploration of the synergies between professional learning communities and communities of practices. Creative Education, 3(4), 457–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lipman, P. (2009). Paradoxes of teaching in neo-liberal times: education 'reform' in Chicago. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: international trends, challenges and ways forward (pp. 67–80). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Luke, A. (2011). Generalizing across borders: policy and the limits of educational science. Educational Researcher, 40(8), 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lund, A. (2008). Assessment made visible: individual and collective practices. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15, 32–51.Google Scholar
  27. Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2009). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.Google Scholar
  28. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  30. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2001). Mathematics assessment: cases and discussion questions (grades K-5). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Mathematics assessment: cases and discussion questions (grades 6–12). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  32. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (NCTM). (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  33. Ontario Ministry of Education (OME). (2005a). The Ontario curriculum grades 1–8 mathematics revised. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer.Google Scholar
  34. Ontario Ministry of Education (OME). (2005b). The Ontario curriculum grades 9 and 10 mathematics revised. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer.Google Scholar
  35. Ontario Ministry of Education (OME). (2007). The Ontario curriculum grades 11 and 12 mathematics revised. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer.Google Scholar
  36. Ontario Ministry of Education (OME). (2010). Growing success: assessment, evaluation, and reporting in Ontario schools. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer.Google Scholar
  37. Romagnano, L. (2001). The myth of objectivity in mathematics assessment. Mathematics Teacher, 94(1), 31–37.Google Scholar
  38. Sfard, A. (2003). Balancing the unbalanceable: the NCTM Standards in the light of theories of learning mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion for NCTM Standards (pp. 353–392). Reston, VA: National Council for Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  39. Shepard, L. A. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 1066–1101). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  40. Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: the uses and abuses of assessment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Suurtamm, C. (2004). Developing authentic assessment: case studies of secondary school mathematics teachers’ experiences. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 4, 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Suurtamm, C., & Graves, B. (2007), Curriculum implementation in intermediate mathematics (CIIM): Research Report. www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/studentsuccess/lms/files/CIIMResearchReport2007.pdf
  43. Suurtamm, C., Koch, M., & Arden, A. (2010). Teachers’ emerging assessment practices in mathematics: classrooms in the context of reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 17(4), 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Volante, L., & Beckett, D. (2011). Formative assessment and the contemporary classroom: synergies and tensions between research and practice. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(2), 239–255.Google Scholar
  45. Webb, M., & Jones, J. (2009). Exploring tensions in developing assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(2), 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 1053–1098). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  48. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: an analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations