Advertisement

Readiness and expectations questionnaire: a cross-cultural measurement instrument for first-year university students

Article

Abstract

The readiness and expectations questionnaire (REQ) assesses first-year students’ expectations and preparedness for their first year in university. This measurement instrument is useful for educational policy and curriculum development; it can also be used to predict the outcomes of the first year of college. This instrument was initially developed to compare students enrolled in programs in the Netherlands and New Zealand, with predominant populations of domestic students. However, the Bologna process and globalisation trends also have increased the availability of international degree programmes. This raised the question whether the REQ can be used to compare groups of international students. Therefore, this article aims to assess the cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the REQ in international bachelor degree programmes in economics and business in a Dutch university, taught in English. The results indicate that not all aspects of the instrument achieve measurement equivalence, but most of its scales, with some adaptations, can evaluate students’ expectations and preparedness and thus encourage a better match between student and institution.

Keywords

Expectations First-year students Cross-cultural Measurement equivalence International students Cross-national research 

References

  1. Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billiet, J. (2003). Cross-cultural equivalence with structural equation modelling. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. Van de Vijver, & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 247–264). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Braxton, J. M., Sullivan, A. V. S., & Johnson, R. M. (1997). Appraising Tinto’s theory of college student departure. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: handbook of theory and research (pp. 107–164). New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Byrne, M., & Flood, B. (2005). A study of accounting students’ motives, expectations and preparedness for higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(2), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. M., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chalmers, D., & Volet, S. (1997). Common misconceptions about students from South-East Asia studying in Australia. Higher Education Research and Development, 16(1), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crose, B. (2011). Internationalization of the higher education classroom: strategies to facilitate intercultural learning and academic success. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 388–395.Google Scholar
  8. Davidov, E. (2009). Measurement equivalence of nationalism and constructive patriotism in the ISSP: 34 countries in a comparative perspective. Political Analysis, 17(1), 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eurydice (2010). Organisation of the education system in the Netherlands 2008/09. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/eurybase/eurybase_full_reports/NL_EN.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2012
  10. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jansen, E. P. W. A., & van der Meer, J. (2007). First-year students’ expectations and perceptions of readiness before they start university. In: Enhancing higher education theory and scholarship, refereed proceedings of the 30th HERDSA annual conference (pp. 275–284).Google Scholar
  12. Jansen, E. P. W. A., & Suhre, C. J. M. (2010). The effect of secondary school study skills preparation on first-year university achievement. Educational Studies 36(5), 1–12.Google Scholar
  13. Jansen, E. P. W. A., & Suhre, C. J. M. (2011). Preparedness, first-year experiences and outcomes: A comparison between students in domestic and international degree programmes in a Dutch university. In: Higher Education on the Edge, refereed proceedings of the 33rd HERDSA Annual conference.Google Scholar
  14. Keup, J. R., & Stolzenberg, E. B. (2004). The 2003 your first college year survey. Exploring the academic and personal experiences of first-year students. Columbia: University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  15. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Krause, K. (2005). The changing face of the first year: challenges for policy and practice in research-led universities. University of Queensland First Year Experience Workshop 2005, 31 OctoberGoogle Scholar
  17. Krause, K., Hartley, R., James, R., & McInnis, C. (2005). The first year experience in Australian Universities: findings from a decade of national studies. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  18. Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Tse, L. K. (1996). Memorizing and understanding: the keys to the paradox? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 69–83). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre and the Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  19. McAdams, D. P. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story. In O. John, R. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.) Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 241–261). New York: Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
  20. McInnis, C., & James, R. (2004). Access and retention in Australian higher education. In M. Yorke & B. Longden (Eds.), Retention and student success in Higher Education. Berkshire, England: SRHE, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meuleman, B., Davidov, E., & Billiet, J. (2009). Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: a dynamic group conflict theory approach. Social Science Research, 38(2), 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide, 6th ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & MuthénGoogle Scholar
  24. Nicholson, N. (1990). The transition cycle: Causes, outcomes, processes and forms. In S. Fisher & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), On the move: the psychology of change and transition (pp. 83–108). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. NUFFIC (Netherlands organisation for international cooperation in higher education) (2012). Mapping mobility 2012. International Mobility in Dutch Higher Education. http://www.nuffic.nl/en/expertise/mobility-statistics. Accessed 18 February 2013
  26. Robinson, S., Pope, D., & Holyoak, L. (2011). Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.629291.
  27. Slethaug, G., & Manjula, J. (2012). The business of education: improving international student learning experiences in Malaysia. World Journal of Social Sciences, 2(6), 179–199.Google Scholar
  28. Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Surgenor, P. W. G. (2011). Measuring up: comparing first year students’ and tutors’ expectations of assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.630976.
  30. Torenbeek, M., Jansen, E. P. W. A., & Hofman, A. (2010). The effect of the fit between secondary and university education on first-year student achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 659–675.Google Scholar
  31. Van der Meer, J., Jansen, E. P. W. A., & Torenbeek, M. (2010). It’s almost a mindset that teachers need to change: first-year students’ need to be inducted into time management. Studies in Higher Education 35(7), 777–791.Google Scholar
  32. Walberg, H. J. (1981). A psychological theory of educational productivity. In F. H. Farley & N. Gordon (Eds.), Psychology and education (pp. 81–110). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  33. Waters, D. (2003). Supporting first-year students in the Bachelor of Arts: an investigation of academic staff attitudes. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 2(3), 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2004). Retention and student success in higher education. Berkshire, England: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2008) The first year experience of higher education in the UK. York: Higher Education Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ourwork/research/surveys/fye. Accessed 15 December 2012

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Behavioural and Social SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of SociologyTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations