“I really need feedback to learn:” students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages

Article

Abstract

The current study examined students’ perceptions of the effects of different forms of instructional feedback on their performance, motivation, and emotion. Forty-nine students attending an eastern US university participated in focus group discussions. The groups explored students’ reactions to grades, praise, and computer versus instructor provided feedback, as well as students’ views of the ideal feedback. Students named detailed comments as the most important and useful form of feedback. Grades were deemed to be unnecessary if the goal of an activity was to learn. Students proposed that low grades elicit negative affect and damage the students’ sense of self-efficacy, and high grades decrease motivation and lessen students’ perceived need to improve. Praise was reported to positively affect emotion, but not to be directly conducive to learning.

Keywords

Formative assessment Feedback Grades Praise Source of information Focus groups 

References

  1. Airasian, P. W. (1994). Classroom assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238.Google Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., Hutton, D. G., & Cairns, K. J. (1990). Negative effects of praise on skilled performance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation; the effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1–14.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, R., & Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 210–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron, J., & Pierce, D. P. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64, 363–423.Google Scholar
  8. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.Google Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dev, P. C. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: what does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Earley, P. C. (1988). Computer-generated performance feedback in the Subscription-processing industry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 162–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferdig, R. E., & Mishra, P. (2004). Emotional responses to computers: experiences in unfairness, anger and spite. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypertext, 13, 143–161.Google Scholar
  14. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: an experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guskey, T., & Bailey, J. (2001). Developing grading and reporting systems for student learning. Thousand Oaks: Crown.Google Scholar
  16. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Henderlong, J., & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: a review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 774–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kanouse, D. E., Gumpert, P., & Canavan-Gumpert, D. (1981). The semantics of praise. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3, pp. 97–115). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: Historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lajoie, S., & Derry, S. (1993). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Landauer, T. K., Latham, D., & Foltz, P. (2003). Automatic essay assessment. Assessment in Education, 10.Google Scholar
  22. Lepper, M. R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D. L., & Gurtner, J. (1993). Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 75–106). Hillsdale: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Lepper, M. R., Henderlong, J., & Gingras, I. (1999). Understanding the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation-uses and abuses of meta-analysis: comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 669–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2008). The effects of differential feedback on students’ performance. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  25. Marzano, R. (2000). Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum and Development.Google Scholar
  26. Mishra, P. (2006). Affective feedback from computers and its effect on perceived ability and affect: a test of the computers as social actors hypothesis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15, 107–131.Google Scholar
  27. Mishra, P., Nicholson, M., & Wojcikiewicz, S. (2001). Does my wordprocessor have a personality? Topffer’s law and educational technology. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 634–641.Google Scholar
  28. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 669–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Carney, P. (1999). Are respondents polite to computers? Social desirability and direct responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1093–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oosterhof, A. (2001). Classroom applications of educational measurement. Upper Saddle River: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Orrell, J. (2006). Feedback on learning achievement: rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Schute, V. J. (2007). Focus on formative feedback. Princeton: Educational Testing Service. RR-07-11.Google Scholar
  34. Shanab, M. E., Peterson, D., Dargahi, S., & Deroian, P. (1981). The effects of positive and negative verbal feedback on the intrinsic motivation of male and female subjects. Journal of Social Psychology, 115, 195–205.Google Scholar
  35. Shute, V. J. (2007). Tensions, trends, tools, and technologies: Time for an educational sea change. In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, E., & Gorard, S. (2005). They don’t give us our marks’: the role of formative feedback in student progress. Assessment in Education Principles Policy & Practice, 12, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tolli, A. P., & Schmidt, A. M. (2008). The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 692–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Torrance, H. (1993). Formative assessment: Some theoretical problems and empirical questions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 23.Google Scholar
  39. Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Testing ServicePrincetonUSA
  2. 2.University of Otago—EARUDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations