Abstract
The problem of teacher incompetence is a serious one, affecting large numbers of American public school students. There is a significant discrepancy between estimated rates of incompetent teachers and the number of teachers actually dismissed on grounds of incompetence. This study sought to uncover the perceptions of teachers regarding a definition of professional incompetence, strategies used with incompetent teachers, and barriers to the dismissal process, through the use of a survey with more than 200 elementary school teachers in Virginia and follow-up interviews with seven of these participants. The researcher found that teachers rated classroom behaviors to be the most important factors towards a definition of professional incompetence. The teachers involved also rated the commonness of strategies used with incompetent teachers, placing dismissal among the least common actions taken by administrators, and revealed that they believed union protection, legal and other expenses, and difficulty providing documentation prevented administrators from dismissing incompetent teachers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, H.A. (1995). Teachers can be Fired!: The Quest for Quality. Chicago: Catfeet.
Annunziata, J. (1999). Richard Fossey: If a Practitioner Cleans the Windows, Will you Look in? Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 13, 83–92
Blacklock, K. (2002). Dealing with an Incompetent Teacher. Principal 81(4), 26–28
Bridges, E.M. (1986a). Collaborative Research: The Case of the Incompetent Teacher. Teacher Education Quarterly 13(2), 59–66
Bridges, E.M. (1986b). The Incompetent Teacher. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
Bridges, E.M. (1990). Evaluation for Tenure and Dismissal. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (eds.), The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp. 147–157). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
Bridges, E.M. (1992). The Incompetent Teacher: Managerial Responses. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
Brieschke, P.A. (1986). The Administrative Role in Teacher Competency. The Urban Review 18, 237–251
Dawson T.C., & Billingsley, K.L. (2000). Unsatisfactory Performance: How California’s K-12 Education System Protects Mediocrity and How Teacher Quality can be Improved. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED453152).
Ehrgott, R., Henderson-Sparks, J.C., & Sparks, R.K., Jr. (1993). A Study of the Marginal Teacher in California. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED356556).
Fossey, R. (1998a). Guest Editor’s Introduction: Expanding Legal Rights for Education Employees—is the Institutional Mission Being Threatened? Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11, 209–214
Fossey, R. (1998b). Secret Settlement Agreements Between School Districts and Problem Employees: Some Legal Pitfalls. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12, 61–67
Fossey, R. (1999). Acknowledging a Problem is the First Step to Solving It: A Response to Joyce Annunziata. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 13, 93–94
Frase, L.E. & Streshly, W. (2000). Top Ten Myths in Education: Fantasies Americans Love to Believe. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.
Fuhr, D.L. (1993). Managing Mediocrity in the Classroom: School Leaders must Rescue Students from Borderline Teachers. The School Administrator 50(4), 26–29
Henderson-Sparks, J.C., Ehrgott, R.H., & Sparks, R.K., Jr. (1995). Managing your Marginal Teachers. Principal 74(4), 32–35
Jackson, W.W. & Riffel, J.A. (1988). Teacher Incompetence: A Cautionary Note. Education Canada 28(4), 12–18
Jones, R. (1997). Showing Bad Teachers the Door. American School Board Journal 184(11), 20–24
Kern, A. & Kern, M.D. (2001). American Public School Law (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning.
Krathwohl, D.R. (1998). Methods of Educational and Social Science Research: An Integrated Approach (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Kvenvold, J.C. (1989). Incompetence and Tenured Teachers: A Survey of Teacher Evaluation and Follow-up. NASSP Bulletin 73(516), 99–102
Lavely, C., Berger, N., & Follman, J. (1992). Actual Incidence of Incompetent Teachers. Educational Research Quarterly 15(2), 11–14
Lawrence, C.E., Vachon, M.K., Leake, D.O., & Leake, B.H. (2001). The Marginal Teacher: A Step-by-Step Guide to Fair Procedures for Identification and Dismissal (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Loup, K.S., Garland, J.S., Ellett, C.D., & Rugutt, J.K. (1996). Ten Years Later: Findings from a Replication of a Study of Teacher Evaluation Practices in our 100 Largest School Districts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 10(3), 203–226
MacNaughton, R. & Ross, V.J. (1982). With Preparation, You can Clear the Teacher Termination Hurdles. The American School Board Journal 169(4), 32–34
McGrath, M.J. (1993). When it’s Time to Dismiss an Incompetent Teacher: School Leaders Need a Legally Sound Process for Supervision, Documentation, Termination. The School Administrator 50(4), 30–33
McGrath, M.J. (1995). Effective Evaluation. Thrust for Educational Leadership 24(6), 36–39
Neill, S.B. & Custis, J. (1978). Staff Dismissal: Problems and Solutions (AASA Critical. Issues Report). Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED172417).
Painter, S.R. (2000a). Easing Dismissals and Non-renewals. The School Administrator 57(9), 40–41
Painter, S.R. (2000b). Principals’ Perceptions of Barriers to Teacher Dismissal. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 14, 253–264
Peterson, K.D. (2000). Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Phillips, W. & Young, B. (1997). Just Caring?: Supervisors Talk About Working with Incompetent Teachers. Journal of Educational Thought 31, 105–121
Pratt, F. (1996). The Ethical Principal and Teacher Nonretention. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 10, 29–36
Randklev, B. & Lemon, D.K. (1990). When Tenured Teachers Fail. Principal 70(2), 44–45
Sanders, W.L. & Horn, S.P. (1998). Research Findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) Database: Implications for Educational Evaluation and Research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12, 247–256
Schweizer, P. (1998). Firing Offenses: Why is the Quality of Teachers so Low? Just Try Getting Rid of a Bad One. National Review 50(15), 41–48
Seyfarth, J.T. (1991). Personnel Management for Effective Schools. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Sullivan, K.A. & Zirkel, P.A. (1998). The Law of Teacher Evaluation: Case Law Update. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11, 367–380
Troen, V. & Boles, K.C. (2003). Who’s Teaching your Children? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tucker, P.D. (1997). Lake Wobegon: Where all Teachers are Competent (or, Have We Come to Terms with the Problem of Incompetent Teachers?). Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11, 103–126
VanSciver, J.H. (1990). Teacher Dismissals. Phi Delta Kappan 72, 318–319
Virginia School Laws. (2000). Code of Virginia 1950. §§ 22.1–302 to 22.1–314. Charlottesville, VA: Michie.
Ward, M.E. (1995). Teacher Dismissal: The Impact of Tenure, Administrator Competence, and Other Factors. School Administrator 52(5), 16–19
Whitaker, T. (2002). Dealing with Difficult Teachers (2nd ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
Wragg, E.C., Haynes, G.S., Wragg, C.M., & Chamberlin, R.P. (2000). Failing Teachers? London: Routledge.
Wright, S.P., Horn, S.P., & Sanders, W.L. (1997). Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11, 57–67
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A
Survey
Section A
Definition of Incompetence
The purpose of this section is to identify what behaviors or characteristics teachers believe to be factors that contribute to professional incompetence.
Please indicate your opinion of the importance of items 1–19 to the definition of professional incompetence by checking your response on the scale of agreement from “Little or no importance” through “High degree of importance.”
| Little or no importance | Some importance | Good deal of importance | High degree of importance |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. lack of subject matter knowledge | □ | □ | □ | □ |
2. inability to express content clearly | □ | □ | □ | □ |
3. failure to teach curriculum prescribed | □ | □ | □ | □ |
4. poor reading, writing, or skills | □ | □ | □ | □ |
5. lack of lesson planning | □ | □ | □ | □ |
6. low levels of student achievement | □ | □ | □ | □ |
7. excessive student drop-out or transfer rates | □ | □ | □ | □ |
8. weak classroom management skills | □ | □ | □ | □ |
9. behavior causing low morale or fear among students | □ | □ | □ | □ |
10. weak or absent communication with parents | □ | □ | □ | □ |
11. large number of parent complaints | □ | □ | □ | □ |
12. negative relations with colleagues | □ | □ | □ | □ |
13. negative relations with superiors | □ | □ | □ | □ |
14. resistance to school- or district-wide initiatives | □ | □ | □ | □ |
15. refusal to obey school rules | □ | □ | □ | □ |
16. poor professional judgment | □ | □ | □ | □ |
17. lack of professional development | □ | □ | □ | □ |
18. poor attitude toward teaching responsibilities | □ | □ | □ | □ |
19. other (please specify) | □ | □ | □ | □ |
Section B
Strategies Used with Incompetent Teachers
The purpose of this section is to identify what teachers believe to be strategies administrators use with incompetent teachers. Items 20–39 explore specific strategies which may be used with incompetent teachers.
Please indicate your opinion of how commonly these strategies are used with incompetent teachers by administrators in general by checking the response on the scale of agreement from “Very uncommon” through “Very common.”
| Very uncommon | Somewhat uncommon | Somewhat common | Very common |
---|---|---|---|---|
20. successful remediation/improvement | □ | □ | □ | □ |
21. voluntary switch to another teaching assignment in the school | □ | □ | □ | □ |
22. involuntary switch to another teaching assignment in the school | □ | □ | □ | □ |
23. voluntary switch to a non-teaching assignment in the school | □ | □ | □ | □ |
24. involuntary switch to a non-teaching assignment in the school | □ | □ | □ | □ |
25. voluntary transfer to another school in same district | □ | □ | □ | □ |
26. involuntary transfer to another school in same district | □ | □ | □ | □ |
27. transfer to another district | □ | □ | □ | □ |
28. assignment as a substitute teacher for district | □ | □ | □ | □ |
29. assignment as an itinerant teacher for district | □ | □ | □ | □ |
30. promotion to central office position | □ | □ | □ | □ |
31. increased workload to encourage teacher resignation | □ | □ | □ | □ |
32. provision with monetary settlement to leave/contract buy-out | □ | □ | □ | □ |
33. counseling or encouragement to leave the profession | □ | □ | □ | □ |
34. voluntary departure from the profession without administrator intervention | □ | □ | □ | □ |
35. retirement based on age or years of teaching | □ | □ | □ | □ |
36. early retirement | □ | □ | □ | □ |
37. forced resignation | □ | □ | □ | □ |
38. dismissal | □ | □ | □ | □ |
39. other (please specify) | □ | □ | □ | □ |
Section C
Barriers to the Dismissal of Incompetent Teachers
The purpose of this section is to identify what teachers believe to be barriers to the dismissal of incompetent teachers. Items 40–49 explore specific barriers administrators may perceive and which may be present when attempting to dismiss incompetent teachers.
Please indicate your opinion of the strength of the barriers to the dismissal of incompetent teachers, as perceived by administrators in general. Use the barriers listed below by checking the response on the scale of agreement from “Little or no strength” through “High degree of strength.”
| Little or no strength | Some strength | Good deal of strength | High degree of strength |
---|---|---|---|---|
40. legal and other expenses | □ | □ | □ | □ |
41. required administrative time | □ | □ | □ | □ |
42. difficulty providing needed documentation | □ | □ | □ | □ |
43. protection of employee by professional association (e.g. NEA, AFT) | □ | □ | □ | □ |
44. unclear definition of incompetence | □ | □ | □ | □ |
45. lack of resolve or strength of character by principal | □ | □ | □ | □ |
46. lack of support by superiors of principal (superintendent, central office, school board) | □ | □ | □ | □ |
47. lack of support by school employees (other teachers, faculty, staff) | □ | □ | □ | □ |
48. lack of skill by the principal to achieve dismissal | □ | □ | □ | □ |
49. other (please specify) | □ | □ | □ | □ |
Section D
Demographic Data
Please complete each of the following items. The items are included to assist in more accurately reviewing the information provided.
50. Gender : _____Male _____Female |
51. Years of experience teaching:_____ |
52. Years of teaching in this school division:_____ |
53. Approximate number of teachers with whom you have worked that you considered incompetent: _____ |
Thank you very much for your time and energy! Please return the survey, using the pony envelope enclosed.
Appendix B
Interview Protocol
Directions
Please answer the following questions in as much detail as you deem appropriate. Please do not use names in your responses, in order to protect the identity of those teachers and administrators we might discuss here. The information that you provide during this interview will be handled confidentially, with your name being replaced with a pseudonym if I use excerpts from this interview in my writing. Interviews will be audio recorded, then transcribed, and you will be sent a transcript of this interview in order to check for accuracy. If you want to withdraw from the study during the interview, tell me and I will stop the interview and the audio recording. Thanks for your participation.
-
1.
Do you consider teacher incompetence to be a problem? Please explain.
-
2.
How do you define professional incompetence for a teacher?
-
Which aspects of your definition do you think are the most important?
-
What are some examples of an incompetent teacher’s behavior?
-
-
3.
How do administrators respond to incompetent teachers?
-
4.
What specific strategies do administrators use with incompetent teachers?
-
How successful are these strategies?
-
What have been the results of these various strategies?
-
For the teacher?
-
For the rest of the faculty?
-
For the school?
-
-
In your opinion, is dismissal a viable option for administrators to use with incompetent teachers? Why or why not?
-
How do you think principals should deal with professional incompetence?
-
-
5.
What do you think are the barriers to the dismissal of incompetent teachers?
-
Which of these are the strongest barriers? Why?
-
If you don’t think there are any barriers, why do you think this?
-
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Menuey, B.P. Teachers’ Perceptions of Professional Incompetence and Barriers to the Dismissal Process. J Pers Eval Educ 18, 309–325 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-007-9026-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-007-9026-7