How Do Faculty Make Formative Use of Student Evaluation Feedback?: A Multiple Case Study

Article

Abstract

This multiple case study explored faculty formative use of student evaluation feedback. Results were based on interviews of ten education faculty members at a midwestern research university and reviews of relevant documents. It was found that end of semester student evaluation, originally used for summative evaluation, was also used by faculty for teaching improvement purposes. Faculty cared for student evaluation feedback and used discretion in using the feedback to improve their teaching. Faculty also experienced anxiety and tensions in the context of a mandated summative evaluation. Variations were found in faculty use of evaluation feedback, as a result of difference in background and experience.

Keywords

Student evaluation of teaching Formative use of evaluation feedback Summative evaluation 

References

  1. Algozzine, B., Beattie, J., Bray, M., Flowers, C., Gretes, J., Howley, L., et al. (2004). Student evaluation of college teaching. College Teaching 52(4), 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective Faculty Evaluation. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Cramer, K. M., & Alexitch, L. R. (2000). Student evaluations of college professors: identifying sources of bias. Canadian Journal of Higher Education 30(2), 143–164.Google Scholar
  4. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, California: SageGoogle Scholar
  5. Eiszler, C. F. (2002). College Students' Evaluations of teaching and grade inflation. Research in Higher Education 43(4), 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fenwick, T. J. (2001). Using student outcomes to evaluate teaching: a cautious exploration. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 88, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frost, S. H., & Teodorescu, D. (2001). Teaching excellence: how faculty guided change at a research university. Review of Higher Education 24(4), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobs, L. C. (1987). University Faculty and Students' Opinions of Student Ratings. Bloomington, Indiana: Bureau of Evaluative Studies and Testing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED291291).Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, R. (2000). The authority of the student evaluation questionnaire. Teaching in Higher Education 5(4), 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., & Kwan, K. P. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27(5), 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marincovich, M. (1998). Ending the Disconnect Between the Student Evaluation of Teaching and the Improvement of Teaching: A Faculty Developer's Plea (Report No. NCPI-1-02). Standford, California: National Center for Postsecondary Improvement. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED428590).Google Scholar
  12. Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research 11, 255–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. (1993). The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal 30(1), 217–251.Google Scholar
  14. Midwest University (1989). Guidelines for evaluation of faculty: annual evaluations, promotion, and tenure. Retrieved May 5, 2000, from http://www.???.edu/svcaa/policies/faculty/ tenureguide.html.
  15. Midwest University (1998). Post-tenure review policy. Retrieved May 6, 2000, from http://www.???.edu/svcaa/polocies/posttenure.html.
  16. Midwest University, School of Education (1997a). Promotion and Tenure Document.Google Scholar
  17. Midwest University, School of Education (1997b). Official Papers.Google Scholar
  18. Murray, H. G., Jelley, R. R., & Renauld, R. D. (1996, April). Longitudinal Trends in Student Instructional Ratings: Does Evaluation of Teaching Lead to Improvement of Teaching? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Olivares, O. J. (2002). A conceptual and analytic critique of student ratings of teachers in the USA with implications for teacher effectiveness and student learning. Teaching in Higher Education 8(2), 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saroyan, A., & Amundsen, C. (2001). Evaluation university teaching: time to take stock. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26(4), 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmelkin, L. P., Spencer, K. J., & Gellman, E. S. (1997). Faculty perspectives on course and teacher evaluations. Research in Higher Education 38(5), 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M., & Griffiths, M. (2000). The Validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: love me, love my lectures? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25(4), 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sojka, J., Gupta, A. K., & Deeter-Schmelz, D. R. (2002). Student and faculty perceptions of student evaluations of teaching: a study of similarities and differences. College Teaching 50(2), 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spencer, P. A., & Flyr, M. A. (1992) The formal evaluation as an impetus to classroom change: myth or reality? Riverside, California. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED349053).Google Scholar
  25. Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Wolfer, T. A., & Johnson, M. M. (2003). Re-evaluating student evaluation of teaching: the teaching evaluation form. Journal of Social Work Education 39(1), 111–121.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.3300 LovingerCentral Missouri State UniversityWarrensburgUSA
  2. 2.128 Teachers College HallUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations