Skip to main content
Log in

How Do Faculty Make Formative Use of Student Evaluation Feedback?: A Multiple Case Study

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This multiple case study explored faculty formative use of student evaluation feedback. Results were based on interviews of ten education faculty members at a midwestern research university and reviews of relevant documents. It was found that end of semester student evaluation, originally used for summative evaluation, was also used by faculty for teaching improvement purposes. Faculty cared for student evaluation feedback and used discretion in using the feedback to improve their teaching. Faculty also experienced anxiety and tensions in the context of a mandated summative evaluation. Variations were found in faculty use of evaluation feedback, as a result of difference in background and experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algozzine, B., Beattie, J., Bray, M., Flowers, C., Gretes, J., Howley, L., et al. (2004). Student evaluation of college teaching. College Teaching 52(4), 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective Faculty Evaluation. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K. M., & Alexitch, L. R. (2000). Student evaluations of college professors: identifying sources of bias. Canadian Journal of Higher Education 30(2), 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiszler, C. F. (2002). College Students' Evaluations of teaching and grade inflation. Research in Higher Education 43(4), 483–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. J. (2001). Using student outcomes to evaluate teaching: a cautious exploration. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 88, 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, S. H., & Teodorescu, D. (2001). Teaching excellence: how faculty guided change at a research university. Review of Higher Education 24(4), 397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L. C. (1987). University Faculty and Students' Opinions of Student Ratings. Bloomington, Indiana: Bureau of Evaluative Studies and Testing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED291291).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2000). The authority of the student evaluation questionnaire. Teaching in Higher Education 5(4), 419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., & Kwan, K. P. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27(5), 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marincovich, M. (1998). Ending the Disconnect Between the Student Evaluation of Teaching and the Improvement of Teaching: A Faculty Developer's Plea (Report No. NCPI-1-02). Standford, California: National Center for Postsecondary Improvement. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED428590).

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research 11, 255–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. (1993). The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal 30(1), 217–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midwest University (1989). Guidelines for evaluation of faculty: annual evaluations, promotion, and tenure. Retrieved May 5, 2000, from http://www.???.edu/svcaa/policies/faculty/ tenureguide.html.

  • Midwest University (1998). Post-tenure review policy. Retrieved May 6, 2000, from http://www.???.edu/svcaa/polocies/posttenure.html.

  • Midwest University, School of Education (1997a). Promotion and Tenure Document.

  • Midwest University, School of Education (1997b). Official Papers.

  • Murray, H. G., Jelley, R. R., & Renauld, R. D. (1996, April). Longitudinal Trends in Student Instructional Ratings: Does Evaluation of Teaching Lead to Improvement of Teaching? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

  • Olivares, O. J. (2002). A conceptual and analytic critique of student ratings of teachers in the USA with implications for teacher effectiveness and student learning. Teaching in Higher Education 8(2), 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroyan, A., & Amundsen, C. (2001). Evaluation university teaching: time to take stock. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26(4), 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmelkin, L. P., Spencer, K. J., & Gellman, E. S. (1997). Faculty perspectives on course and teacher evaluations. Research in Higher Education 38(5), 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M., & Griffiths, M. (2000). The Validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: love me, love my lectures? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25(4), 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sojka, J., Gupta, A. K., & Deeter-Schmelz, D. R. (2002). Student and faculty perceptions of student evaluations of teaching: a study of similarities and differences. College Teaching 50(2), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, P. A., & Flyr, M. A. (1992) The formal evaluation as an impetus to classroom change: myth or reality? Riverside, California. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED349053).

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfer, T. A., & Johnson, M. M. (2003). Re-evaluating student evaluation of teaching: the teaching evaluation form. Journal of Social Work Education 39(1), 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuankun Yao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yao, Y., Grady, M.L. How Do Faculty Make Formative Use of Student Evaluation Feedback?: A Multiple Case Study. J Pers Eval Educ 18, 107–126 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-006-9000-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-006-9000-9

Keywords

Navigation