Skip to main content
Log in

Trees and the “Unthought Known”: The Wisdom of the Nonhuman (or Do Humans “Have Shit for Brains”?)

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on Richard Powers’s Pulitzer-winning novel The Overstory (2018), this article explores the limits of human wisdom (or why humans persist in denying what we know about the earth, especially what we knew as children) and wisdom’s bounty within the wider world, unknown, untapped, unprotected, and disrespected, with a particular focus on trees. It asks how people (the author included but especially white westerners) have come to disbelieve the intelligence of the nonhuman and, as a consequence, resist the ecological disaster wrought by our cherished obliviousness, and it argues for tree knowledge as a reasonable Christian claim, despite warnings that such claims reflect heresy. Influenced by Powers and Lewis Rambo, the essay asks about conversion—what will it take to convert us?—and suggests that pastoral theology’s responsibilities include an embrace of seeing more through fiction and trees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I use “nonhuman,” alongside other terms, to capture what modern Western humans neglect—earth, creation, nature, environment, and so forth—even though it remains an inadequate term, especially when it fosters a binary between human and nonhuman.

  2. There are important exceptions: Calder and Morgan (2016); Clinebell (1996); Graham (1992, 2006); Helsel (2018); LaMothe (2017); Louw (2007); Martin (2015); Mercer (2014, 2017); Pihkala (2016); and Rowley (2013, 2015). As I revised this paper, I reviewed an article for the International Journal of Practical Theology that also notes the “gap in practical theological research” (see McCarroll forthcoming 2020).

  3. I am glad for the chance to turn to Rambo’s work. The Campbell-Stone movement behind his tradition shapes my own faith, albeit through the more liberal branch. He remembers revivals to save souls in the Church of Christ (1993, p. xii-xiv), whereas I lived with a Horace Bushnell-style assumption among Disciples of Christ that children absorb faith through socialization.

  4. Of course, artists, literary figures, and mystics have long grasped the place and power of trees as friends, teachers, and so forth. See Harrison (1992); Kohn (2013); Popova (2019); and Thurman (1979).

  5. Patricia’s initials are the same as Wohlleben’s (Rich 2018).

  6. I have since learned that singing to trees falls within a long historical tradition. See Brockman (2018).

  7. As Rubén Arjona reminded me in his response to this paper, Anton Boisen himself studied forestry and talks about this in Out of the Depths (1960, pp. 50–51, 57), suggesting that he knew about interconnections between tree and forest, document and web.

  8. According to Wikipedia, the Ents “were partly founded in [Tolkien’s] disappointment ‘with the shabby use made in Shakespeare of the coming of “Great Birnam wood to high Dunsinane hill”’ in Macbeth” (Tolkien 1981, pp. 211–212).

  9. This is not to say that there are no powerful alternatives in the tradition or those with unique relationships to nature and trees, such as Howard Thurman (1979) and our own Don Capps (2011). For a recent plea for Christian animism, see Wallace (2019).

  10. Calvin’s quote on nature as God appears in Book 1, “The Knowledge of God the Creator,” in a section devoted to how the knowledge “Shines Forth in the Fashioning of the Universe” (Calvin 1536/1977, p. xi). But the subsection title makes Calvin’s point: “The confusion of creature with Creator” (p. 56).

  11. Ecofeminist and liberation theologians with Calvinist roots have reformed such positions (e.g., Alves, 2016; McFague 1997) as have Catholic scholars (e.g., Boff, 1997; Gebara, 1999).

  12. Powers confirms this hunch in an interview conducted by Michael Alec Rose (2018). The novel itself was inspired by what Powers describes in a Guardian interview as “a kind of ‘religious conversion’” in front of a giant redwood (John 2018; see also Brady 2018; Smith 2019).

  13. Seventeen species “are named on the first page alone” (Planta 2018). Powers wanted a story “with nonhuman characters that did not in any way try to anthropomorphize them” (Rose 2018).

References

  • Alves, R. (2016). The best chronicles of Rubem Alves. Hanover: New London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, D. C., Cahalan, K. A., Miller-McLemore, B. J., Nieman, J. R., & Scharen, C. B. (2016). Christian practical wisdom: What it is, why it matters. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of unthought known. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boff, L. (1997). Cry of the earth, cry of the poor. Maryknoll: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisen, A. T. (1960). Out of the depths: An autobiographical study of mental disorder and religious experience. New York: Harper & Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, A. (2018). Richard Powers: Writing ‘the Overstory’ quite literally changed my life. Chicago Review of Books. https://chireviewofbooks.com/2018/04/18/overstory-richard-powers-interview/. Accessed August 8, 2018.

  • Brockman, T. (2018). Why we wassail? Christian Century, December 14. https://www.christiancentury.org/article/first-person/why-we-wassail. Accessed February 1, 2019.

  • Calder, A. S., & Morgan, J. E. (2016). ‘Out of the whirlwind’: Clinical pastoral education and climate change. Journal of Pastoral Care and Counseling, 70(1), 16–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, J. (1977). The institutes of the Christian religion, 2 vols., J. T. McNeill (Ed.). Philadelphia: Westminster press. (Original work published 1536).

  • Capps, D. (2011). Trees and us: Poetic metaphors and pastoral images. Pastoral Psychology, 60(3), 437–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalhaes, C. (2019). Decoloniality, theory and methodology. Plenary address, International Academy of Practical Theology Conference, April 4, 2019.

  • Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked problems. Management Science, 14, 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinebell, H. (1996). Ecotherapy: Healing ourselves, healing the earth. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cone, J. H. (2000). Whose earth is it anyway? Cross Currents, 50(1–2), 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. F. (2009). Scripture, culture, and agriculture: An agrarian reading of the bible. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, R. (2018). Email correspondence.

  • Garzón, P. C. (2007). The quest for cognition in plant neurobiology. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 2(4), 208–211, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2634130/. Accessed July 18, 2019.

  • Garzón, P. C. & Keijzer, F. (2011). Plants: Adaptive behavior, root-brains, and minimal cognition. Sage journals. https://journals.sagepub.comhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1059712311409446. Accessed July 17, 2019.

  • Gebara, I. (1999). Longing for running water: Ecofeminism and liberation. Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A. (2017). The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glückspilze, T. (2014). Was sollte ich über die anwendung von mykorrhiza-produkten wissen? (What should I know about using mycorrhizal products?). www.gluckspilze.com/faq. Accessed July 12, 2019.

  • Gossner, M., et al. (2009). Wie viele Arten leben auf der älteste Tanne des Bayerischen Walds? (how many species lives on the oldest pine in the Bavarian Forest?). AFA-Der Wald, 4, 164–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. K. (1992). Care of persons, care of worlds: A psychosystems approach to pastoral care and counseling. Nashville: Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. K. (2006). Pastoral theology and catastrophic disaster. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 16, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, J. M. (1981). Ethics from a theocentric perspective: Theology and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, J. M. (1994). A sense of the divine: The natural environment from a theocentric perspective. Cleveland: Pilgrim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (2017). Ecowomanism: African-American women and earth-honoring faiths. Maryknoll: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. P. (1992). Forests: The shadow of civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsel, P. B. (2018). Loving the world: Place attachment and environment. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 28(1), 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, R. J. (1995). The therapeutic tradition of pastoral care and counseling. In P. D. Couture & R. J. Hunter (Eds.), Pastoral care and social conflict (pp. 17–31). Abingdon: Nashville.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, E. (2018). Richard Powers: ‘We’re completely alienated from everything else alive.’ The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/16/richard-powers-interview-overstory. Accessed August 8, 2018.

  • Kennedy, K. & Molen, G. R. (Producers), & Spielberg, S. (Director). (1993). Jurassic Park. United States: Universal Pictures.

  • Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver, B. (2012). Flight behavior. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver, B. (2018a). Unsheltered. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver, B. (2018b). The heros of this novel are centuries old and 300 feet tall. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/books/review/overstory-richard-powers.html. Accessed August 8, 2019.

  • Kohn, E. (2013). How forest think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaMothe, R. (2017). This changes everything: The sixth extinction and its implications for pastoral theology. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 26(3), 178–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw, D. J. (2007). Dreaming the land in hope: Towards a practical theological ecclesiology of cura terrae. In H. Ziebertz & F. Schweitzer (Eds.), Dreaming the land: Theologies of resistance and hope (pp. 10–29). Berlin: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, G. (1949). Being and having, translated by K. Farrer. Westminster: Dacre Press.

  • Martin, M. K. (2015). The human-nature relationship: Challenges for practical theology and Christian discipleship. Practical Theology, 8(3–4), 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarroll, P. R. (forthcoming 2020). Listening for the cries of the earth: Practical theology in the Anthropocene. International Journal of Practical Theology.

  • McClure, B. J. (2010). Moving beyond individualism in pastoral care and counseling: Reflections on theory, theology, and practice. Eugene: Cascade Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, B. J. (2019). Emotions: Problems and promise for human flourishing. Waco: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFague, S. (1997). Super, natural Christians: How we should love nature. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. A. (2014). A practical theological approach to ecofeminism: Story of women, faith, and earth advocacy. In D. Candraningrum (Ed.), Body memories: Goddesses of nusantera, rings of fire, and narratives of myth (pp. 93–106). Salatiga: Yayasin Jurnal Perempuan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. A. (2017). Environmental activism in the Philippines: A practical theological perspective. In G. J. Kim & H. P. Koster (Eds.), Planetary solidarity: Global women’s voices on Christian doctrine and climate justice (pp. 287–307). Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-McLemore, B. J. (1993). The human web and the state of pastoral theology. Christian Century, April, 7, 366–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-McLemore, B. J. (1996). The living human web: Pastoral theology at the turn of the century. In J. Stevenson Moessner (Ed.), Through the eyes of women: Insights for pastoral care (pp. 9–26). Philadelphia, PA: Westminster John Knox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-McLemore, B. J. (2012). Christian theology in practice: Discovering a discipline. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

  • Miller-McLemore, B. J. (2016). Academic theology and practical knowledge. In D. C. Bass, K. A. Cahalan, B. J. Miller-McLemore, J. R. Nieman, & C. B. Scharen (Eds.), Christian practical wisdom: What it is, why it matters (pp. 175–231). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-McLemore, B. J. (2018). The living human web: A twenty-five year retrospective. Pastoral Psychology, 67(3), 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-McLemore, B. J. (2019). General introduction. In B. J. Miller-McLemore (Ed.), the Wiley Blackwell reader in practical theology (pp. 1-17). Malden, Mass.: Wiley Blackwell.

  • Nelson, M. P. (2016). The long reach of Lynn White Jr.’s ‘The historical roots of the ecologic crisis,’ Nature Research Ecology and Evolution Community. https://natureecoevocommunity.nature.com/users/24738-michael-paul-nelson/posts/14041-the-long-reach-of-lynn-white-jr-s-the-historical-roots-of-our-ecologic-crisis. Accessed August 5, 2019.

  • Noë, A. (2011). Do plants have minds? National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2011/12/02/143041917/do-plants-have-minds, Accessed July 17, 2019.

  • Noë, A. (2016). A web of trees and their ‘hidden’ lives. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2016/09/23/494989594/a-web-of-trees-and-their-hidden-lives. Accessed July 17, 2019.

  • Peters, K. E. (2018). Living with the wicked problem of climate change. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 53(2), 427–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pihkala, P. (2016). The pastoral challenge of environmental crisis: Environmental anxiety and Lutheran eco-reformation. Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 55(2), 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M. (2013). The intelligent plant: Scientists debate a new way of understanding flora. The New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/12/23/the-intelligent-plant. Accessed July 17, 2019.

  • Popova, M. (2019). “Relationship lessons from trees.” Brainpickings, https://www.brainpickings.org/2019/11/13/robert-macfarlane-underland-tree-love/, accessed December 17, 2019.

  • Powers, R. (2018). The overstory. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, A. (2016). Barkskins. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambo, L. R. (1993). Understanding religious conversion. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, N. (2018). The novel that asks, “what went wrong with mankind?” The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/richard-powers-the-overstory/559106/, accessed August 8, 2019.

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M. A. (2018). Richard Powers: The biggest questions in literature. Bookpage interview, https://bookpage.com/interviews/22518-richard-powers-fiction#.Xct7sr97n6k, accessed November 12, 2019.

  • Rowley, G. C. (2013). Practicing hope: Congregational environmentalism as intersystemic care (doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest dissertations and theses database. (UMI no. 3592214).

  • Rowley, G. C. (2015). Intersystemic care: How religious environmental praxis expands the pastoral theological norm of relational justice. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 25(2), 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santayana, G. (2002). The letters of George Santayana, book two (1910–1920). Edited with an introduction by W. G. Holzberger. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheib, K. D. (2018). Attend to stories: How to flourish in ministry. Nashville: Wesley’s Foundery Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simard, S. W., Perry, D. A., Jones, M. D., Myrold, D. D., Durall, D. M., & Molina, R. (1997). Net transfer of carbon between tree species with shared ectomycorrhizal fungi. Nature, 40, 579–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simard, S. W. (2012). Video, mother tree. In J. Engelsiepen, ‘mother trees’ use fungal communication systems to preserve forests. Ecology global network, http://www.ecology.com/2012/10/08/trees-communicate/, accessed August 8, 2019.

  • Simard, S. W. (2015). Note from a forest scientist. In P. Wohlleben (Ed.), The hidden life of trees: What they feel, how they communicate: Discoveries from a secret world (pp. 247–250). Vancouver: Greystone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simard, S. W. (2016). TedSummit: How trees talk to each other. https://www.ted.com/talks/suzanne_simard_how_trees_talk_to_each_other?language=en, accessed July 17, 2019.

  • Smith, R. I. (2019). Writing the Pulitzer-winning ‘the Overstory’ changed Richard Powers’s life. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2019/04/richard-powers-pulitzer-the-overstory/587245/, accessed August 8, 2019.

  • Thurman, H. (1979). With head and heart. New York: Harcourt Brace & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolkien, J. R. R. (1965). The lord of the rings. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolkien, J. R. R. (1981). Carpenter, Humphrey with Christopher Tolkien, Eds. The letters of J. R. R. Tolkien. Boston: George Allen & Unwin/Houghton Mifflin.

  • Tompkins, P., & Bird, C. (1973). The secret life of plants. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trewavas, A. (2005). Green plants as intelligent organisms. Trends in Plant Science 10 (9), 413–419, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1360138505001718, accessed July 17, 2019.

  • Wallace, M. I. (2019). When god was a bird: Christianity, animism, and the re-enchantment of the world. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155, 1203–1207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wirzba, N. (2003). The paradise of god: Renewing religion in an ecological age. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlleben, P. (2015). The hidden life of trees: What they feel, how they communicate: Discoveries from a secret world. Vancouver: Greystone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. (2015). The nearest thing to life. Waltham: Brandeis University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff, K. (2018). A billion black anthropocenes or none. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I dedicate the essay to my childhood friend Betsy Roberts (now Giles) who shared my love of the outdoors and thank colleagues in the Collegeville Institute seminar on Christian practical wisdom with whom I shared initial reflections as well as friends in New Directions in Pastoral Theology, especially Rubén Arjona for his formal response.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonnie J. Miller-McLemore.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller-McLemore, B.J. Trees and the “Unthought Known”: The Wisdom of the Nonhuman (or Do Humans “Have Shit for Brains”?). Pastoral Psychol 69, 423–443 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-020-00920-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-020-00920-7

Keywords

Navigation