Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Judging the Self: A Pastoral Theological Analysis of Reality Television

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author explains how Trump reinvented his business failures through reality television by inflating his successes and minimizing his failures. The author then shows how the reality television show itself reflects the rituals of neoliberal capitalism, namely, identification with the boss despite the unequal conditions. Finally, the author maintains that those struggling with layoffs use this entertainment to vicariously compare themselves with others. Echoing the needs of the soul and the theological image of God as judge, this media spectacle invites audiences to identify with individual winners rather than taking collective responsibility for systemic inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, A. (Producer), & Reitman, J. (Director). (2009). Up in the air. Hollywood: Paramount Pictures.

  • Couldry, N. (2004). Teaching us to fake it: The ritualized norms of television’s ‘reality’ games. In S. Murray & L. Oulette (Eds.), Reality TV: Remaking television culture (pp. 57–74). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovitch, A. (2012). Depression: A public feeling. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K. (1978). Everything in its path: Destruction of community in the Buffalo Creek flood. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faller, S. (2009). Reality T.V.: Theology in the video era. St. Louis: Chalice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Random House.

  • Green, J. (2017). Steve Bannon, Donald Trump, and the storming of the presidency. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahnel, R., & Wright, E. O. (2014). Alternatives to capitalism: Proposals for a democratic economy. New York: New Left Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsel, P. B. (2015). Pastoral power beyond psychology’s marginalization: Resisting the discourses of the psy-complex. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henwood, D. (1992). The American dream: It’s not working. Christianity and Crisis, 52(9), 195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, C. (2010). The ‘short step’ from love to hypnosis: A reconsideration of the Stockholm syndrome. Journal for Cultural Research, 14(4), 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Duz, N., & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2013). Reality television: A discourse analytical perspective. In N. Lorenzo-Duz & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.), Real talk: Reality television and discourse analysis in action (pp. 24–39). New York: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. Thousand Oaks: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFague, S. (1987). Models of God: Theology for an ecological, nuclear age. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noer, D. (1993). Healing the wounds: Overcoming the trauma of layoffs and revitalizing downsized organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, E. (2017). Guilty pleasure: How TV created Donald Trump. New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/07/31/the-tv-that-created-donald-trump. Accessed 1 December 2017.

  • Oulette, L., & Hay, J. (2009). Better living through reality television: Post-welfare citizenship. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R. (2017). Breaking: Donald Trump actually says something true about ‘Apprentice’ ratings. TV By the Numbers. http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/more-tv-news/breaking-donald-trump-actually-says-something-true-about-apprentice-ratings/. Accessed 1 December 2017.

  • Postman, N. (1985/2005). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Penguin.

  • Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Raleigh: Duke University Press

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, C. (2004). The political-economic origins of reali-TV. In S. Murray & L. Oulette (Eds.), Reality TV: Remaking television culture (pp. 119–136). New York: New York University Press.

  • Reiss, S., & Wiltz, J. (2004). Why people watch reality TV. Media Psychology, 6, 363–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers-Vaughn, B. (2014). Blessed are those who mourn: Depression as political resistance. Pastoral Psychology, 63(4), 503–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, M. (2016). Understanding Trump by watching The Apprentice. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/understanding-trump-by-watching-the-apprentice-68901. Accessed 1 December 2017.

  • Rothschild, B. (2010). 8 Keys to safe trauma recovery: Take-charge strategies to empower your healing. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, F. S. (2015). What Trump learned on The Apprentice. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/what-trump-learned-on-the-apprentice/2015/11/06/8dd79928-67a8-11e5-9ef3-fde182507eac_story.html?utm_term=.f39bca3ae866v. Accessed 6 Nov.

  • Walker, R. (2014). The shame of poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, M. L. (2015). Guilty pleasures and cultural legitimation. Journal of Popular Culture, 48(5), 990–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, H., & Skeggs, B. (2009). Talking with television: Women, talk shows & modern self-reflexivity. Urbana: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). The attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Browning Helsel.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Helsel, P.B. Judging the Self: A Pastoral Theological Analysis of Reality Television. Pastoral Psychol 68, 549–559 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-019-00863-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-019-00863-8

Keywords

Navigation