Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: A Case Study in Contested Ethics and the Public Uses of Professional Expertise

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article offers both an appreciative and critical review of Bandy Lee’s (ed.) book The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President. The book raises important questions about the ethical conundrum presented by a profession code of ethics containing both the Goldwater Rule’s requirement for practitioners to avoid diagnosis of public figures with whom they have no therapeutic relationship, and the Duty to Warn, which impels them to provide warnings when the risk of danger is suspected. Lee and her colleagues use their expertise in mental health to apply the criterion of dangerousness to the publically observable actions and behaviors of Trump. Authors also address the so called “Trump effect,” or the impact of the intersection between presidential pathologies and societal norms, including the rise of white nativist discourse. After assessing the book, the article considers its theological themes and implications for pastoral and practical theologians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2013). the principles of medical ethics with annotations especially applicable to psychiatry. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from https://www.psychiatry.org/File Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/Ethics/principles-medical-ethics.pdf.

  • Cone, J. H. (2013). A Black theology of liberation. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contarino, Panning, J. (2017). Trump anxiety disorder: The Trump effect on the mental health of half the nation and special populations. In B. X. Lee, (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 235–243), New York: St. Martin’s Press.

  • Covitz, H. (2017). Health, risk, and the duty to protect the community. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 198–208). New York: St. Martin's Press.

  • Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York: New Press.

  • Diaz, D. (2018, January 6). Trump: I’m a ‘very stable genius.’ CNN. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/06/politics/donald-trump-white-house-fitness-very-stable-genius/index.html.

  • Dike, C. (2017, April 20). Transcript of the Duty to Warn Conference [interview with Bandy Lee], Yale School of Medicine. Retrieved from https://us.macmillan.com/static/duty-to-warn-conference-transcript.pdf.

  • Dodes, L. (2017). Sociopathy. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 83–92). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J. (2017). New opportunities for therapy in the age of Trump. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 209–216). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, W. (2007). The wounding and healing of desire: Weaving heaven and earth. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, J. (2017). Donald Trump is: (A) bad, (B), mad, (C) all of the above. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 93–110). New York: St. Martin's Press.

  • Gartrell, N., & Mosbacher, D. (2017). He’s got the world in his hands and his finger on the trigger: The twenty-fifth amendment solution. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 343–355). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, J. (2017). The issue is dangerousness, not mental illness. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 170–180). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, L. L. (2017). Should psychiatrists refrain from commenting on Trump’s Psychology? In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 151–159). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J., & Lee, B. X. (2017). Prologue: Professions and politics. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 1–10). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, L. P. (2016). Make America great again: Donald Trump, racist nativism and the virulent adherence to White supremacy amid US demographic change. Charleston Law Review, 10, 215–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isasi-Diaz, M. (2002). Mujerista theology: A theology for the twenty-first century. Maryknoll: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, L. (2017). Birtherism and the deployment of the Trumpian mind-set. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 261–267). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. X. (2017). The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, J. A. (2018). Psychiatrists diagnosing the president—Moral imperative or ethical violation? New England Journal of Medicine, 378(5), 483–484. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc1716751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. J. (1968). Death in life: Survivors of Hiroshima. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. J. (1986). Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. J. (2017). Forward: Our witness to malignant normality. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. xv–xix). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkin, C. (2017). Pathological narcissism and politics: A lethal mix. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 51–68). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouncey, C. (2018). President Trump’s mental health—Is it morally permissible for psychiatrists to comment? New England Journal of Medicine, 378(5), 405–407. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1714828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, D. M. (2017). Cognitive impairment, dementia and POTUS. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 126–135). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiving, V. (1960). The human situation: A feminine view. The Journal of Religion, 40(2), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1086/485231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, T. (2017). I wrote The art of the deal with Donald Trump: His self-sabotage is rooted in his past. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 69–74). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T. (2017). Trump and the American collective psyche. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 281–297). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, M. J. (2017). Why ‘crazy like a fox’ versus ‘crazy like a crazy’ really matters: Delusional disorder, admiration of brutal dictators, the nuclear codes, and Trump. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 110–125). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, B. P. (2017). Trauma, time, truth, and Trump: How a president freezes healing and promotes crisis. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 219–234). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, H. (2017). In relationship with an abusive president. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 244–260). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, M. (2018). Fire and fury: Inside the Trump White House. London: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association (2005, January). Medical ethics manual. Retrieved from https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/education/medical-ethics-manual/.

  • Wruble, S. (2017). Trump’s daddy issues: A toxic mix for American. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 268–280). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P., & Sword, R. (2017). Unbridled and extreme present hedonism: How the leader of the free world has proven time and again he is unfit for duty. In B. X. Lee (Ed.), The dangerous case of Donald Trump: 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assess a president (pp. 25–50). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Yale University Divinity School, 409 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA

    Joyce Ann Mercer

Authors
  1. Joyce Ann Mercer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joyce Ann Mercer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mercer, J.A. The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: A Case Study in Contested Ethics and the Public Uses of Professional Expertise. Pastoral Psychol 67, 323–336 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-018-0810-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-018-0810-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation