Abstract
This study employs psychological type theory to analyse the ways in which a group of 13 newly ordained Anglican priests (in priest’s orders for 3 or 4 months) reflected on the Eucharistic imagery of the Johannine feeding narrative. In the first exercise, the priests worked in two groups distinguished according to their perceiving preference (7 sensing types and 6 intuitive types). In the second exercise, the priests worked in three groups distinguished according to their judging preferences (4 thinking types, 4 feeling types, and 5 feeling types). The data supported the significance of psychological type in shaping the hermeneutical process (the theory underpinning the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics and liturgical preaching). Sensing types grappled with the plethora of detail within the text. Intuitive types looked for the bigger picture and identified major themes. Thinking types looked for and organised the major issues raised by the passage. Feeling types focused on the human and relational implications of the narrative.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bassett, R. L., Mathewson, K., & Gailitis, A. (1993). Recognising the person in biblical interpretation: an empirical study. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 12, 38–46.
Ellens, H. J. (Ed.). (2012). Psychological hermeneutics for biblical themes and texts: A festschrift in honour of Wayne G. Rollins. London: Bloomsbury.
Francis, L. J. (2005). Faith and psychology: Personality, religion and the individual. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.
Francis, L. J. (2010). Five loaves and two fishes: an empirical study in psychological type and biblical hermeneutics among Anglican preachers. HTS Theological Studies, 66(1), 1–5.
Francis, L. J. (2012a). What happened to the fig tree? an empirical study in psychological type and biblical hermeneutics. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 15(9), 873–891.
Francis, L. J. (2012b). Interpreting and responding to the Johannine feeding narrative: an empirical study in the SIFT hermeneutical method among Anglican ministry training candidates. HTS Theological Studies, 60(1), 1–9.
Francis, L. J. (2013). Ordinary readers and reader perspectives on sacred texts: Drawing on empirical theology and Jungian psychology. In J. Astley & L. J. Francis (Eds.), Exploring ordinary theology: Everyday Christian believing and the Church (pp. 87–96). Farnham: Ashgate.
Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2000). Exploring Luke’s gospel: A guide to the gospel readings in the revised common lectionary. London: Mowbray.
Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2001). Exploring Matthew’s gospel: A guide to the gospel readings in the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Mowbray.
Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2002). Exploring Mark’s gospel: An aid for readers and preachers using year B of the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Continuum.
Francis, L. J., & Jones, S. H. (2011). Reading and proclaiming the resurrection: an empirical study in psychological type theory among trainee and experienced preachers employing Mark 16 and Matthew 28. Journal of Empirical Theology, 24, 1–18.
Francis, L. J., & Village, A. (2008). Preaching with all our souls. London: Continuum.
Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Craig, C. L. (2007). Two different operationalisations of psychological type: Comparing the Myers-Briggs type indicator and the Keirsey temperament sorter. In R. A. Degregorio (Ed.), New developments in psychological testing (pp. 119–138). New York: Nova.
Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Village, A. (2009). Psychological type and the pulpit: an empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics. HTS Theological Studies, 65(1), 161, 1–7.
Francis, L. J., & Smith, G. (in press). Reading and proclaiming the Birth Narratives from Luke and Matthew: A study in empirical theology among curates and their training incumbents employing the SIFT method. HTS Theological Studies.
Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types: The collected works (Vol. 6). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Keirsey, D. (1998). Please understand me: 2. Del Mar: Prometheus Nemesis.
Keirsey, D., & Bates, M. (1978). Please understand me. Del Mar: Prometheus Nemesis.
Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Rollins, W. G., & Kille, D. (Eds.). (2007). Psychological insight into the Bible: Texts and readings. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.
Village, A. (2010). Psychological type and biblical interpretation among Anglican clergy in the UK. Journal of Empirical Theology, 23, 179–200.
Village, A., & Francis, L. J. (2005). The relationship of psychological type preferences to biblical interpretation. Journal of Empirical Theology, 18(1), 74–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
John 6:5–15 (NRSV)
When he looked up and saw a large crowd coming toward him, Jesus said to Philip, “Where are we to buy bread for these people to eat?” He said this to test him, for he himself knew what he was going to do. Philip answered him, “6 months’ wages would not buy enough bread for each of them to get a little.” One of his disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, said to him, “There is a boy here who has five barley loaves and two fish. But what are they among so many people?” Jesus said, “Make the people sit down.” Now there was a great deal of grass in the place; so they sat down, about five thousand in all. Then Jesus took the loaves, and when he had given thanks, he distributed them to those who were seated; so also the fish, as much as they wanted.
When they were satisfied, he told his disciples, “Gather up the fragments left over, so that nothing may be lost.” So they gathered them up, and from the fragments of the five barley loaves, left by those who had eaten, they filled twelve baskets. When the people saw the sign that he had done, they began to say, “This is indeed the prophet who is to come into the world.” When Jesus realized that they were about to come and take him by force to make him king, he withdrew again to the mountain by himself.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francis, L.J., Jones, S.H. Life in the Eucharistic Community: An Empirical Study in Psychological Type Theory and Biblical Hermeneutics Reading John 6:5–15. Pastoral Psychol 63, 281–290 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-013-0540-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-013-0540-x