Skip to main content
Log in

Life in the Eucharistic Community: An Empirical Study in Psychological Type Theory and Biblical Hermeneutics Reading John 6:5–15

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study employs psychological type theory to analyse the ways in which a group of 13 newly ordained Anglican priests (in priest’s orders for 3 or 4 months) reflected on the Eucharistic imagery of the Johannine feeding narrative. In the first exercise, the priests worked in two groups distinguished according to their perceiving preference (7 sensing types and 6 intuitive types). In the second exercise, the priests worked in three groups distinguished according to their judging preferences (4 thinking types, 4 feeling types, and 5 feeling types). The data supported the significance of psychological type in shaping the hermeneutical process (the theory underpinning the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics and liturgical preaching). Sensing types grappled with the plethora of detail within the text. Intuitive types looked for the bigger picture and identified major themes. Thinking types looked for and organised the major issues raised by the passage. Feeling types focused on the human and relational implications of the narrative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bassett, R. L., Mathewson, K., & Gailitis, A. (1993). Recognising the person in biblical interpretation: an empirical study. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 12, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellens, H. J. (Ed.). (2012). Psychological hermeneutics for biblical themes and texts: A festschrift in honour of Wayne G. Rollins. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J. (2005). Faith and psychology: Personality, religion and the individual. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J. (2010). Five loaves and two fishes: an empirical study in psychological type and biblical hermeneutics among Anglican preachers. HTS Theological Studies, 66(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J. (2012a). What happened to the fig tree? an empirical study in psychological type and biblical hermeneutics. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 15(9), 873–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J. (2012b). Interpreting and responding to the Johannine feeding narrative: an empirical study in the SIFT hermeneutical method among Anglican ministry training candidates. HTS Theological Studies, 60(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J. (2013). Ordinary readers and reader perspectives on sacred texts: Drawing on empirical theology and Jungian psychology. In J. Astley & L. J. Francis (Eds.), Exploring ordinary theology: Everyday Christian believing and the Church (pp. 87–96). Farnham: Ashgate.

  • Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2000). Exploring Luke’s gospel: A guide to the gospel readings in the revised common lectionary. London: Mowbray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2001). Exploring Matthew’s gospel: A guide to the gospel readings in the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Mowbray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2002). Exploring Mark’s gospel: An aid for readers and preachers using year B of the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., & Jones, S. H. (2011). Reading and proclaiming the resurrection: an empirical study in psychological type theory among trainee and experienced preachers employing Mark 16 and Matthew 28. Journal of Empirical Theology, 24, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., & Village, A. (2008). Preaching with all our souls. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Craig, C. L. (2007). Two different operationalisations of psychological type: Comparing the Myers-Briggs type indicator and the Keirsey temperament sorter. In R. A. Degregorio (Ed.), New developments in psychological testing (pp. 119–138). New York: Nova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Village, A. (2009). Psychological type and the pulpit: an empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics. HTS Theological Studies, 65(1), 161, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., & Smith, G. (in press). Reading and proclaiming the Birth Narratives from Luke and Matthew: A study in empirical theology among curates and their training incumbents employing the SIFT method. HTS Theological Studies.

  • Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types: The collected works (Vol. 6). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirsey, D. (1998). Please understand me: 2. Del Mar: Prometheus Nemesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirsey, D., & Bates, M. (1978). Please understand me. Del Mar: Prometheus Nemesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, W. G., & Kille, D. (Eds.). (2007). Psychological insight into the Bible: Texts and readings. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Village, A. (2010). Psychological type and biblical interpretation among Anglican clergy in the UK. Journal of Empirical Theology, 23, 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Village, A., & Francis, L. J. (2005). The relationship of psychological type preferences to biblical interpretation. Journal of Empirical Theology, 18(1), 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie J. Francis.

Appendix

Appendix

John 6:5–15 (NRSV)

When he looked up and saw a large crowd coming toward him, Jesus said to Philip, “Where are we to buy bread for these people to eat?” He said this to test him, for he himself knew what he was going to do. Philip answered him, “6 months’ wages would not buy enough bread for each of them to get a little.” One of his disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, said to him, “There is a boy here who has five barley loaves and two fish. But what are they among so many people?” Jesus said, “Make the people sit down.” Now there was a great deal of grass in the place; so they sat down, about five thousand in all. Then Jesus took the loaves, and when he had given thanks, he distributed them to those who were seated; so also the fish, as much as they wanted.

When they were satisfied, he told his disciples, “Gather up the fragments left over, so that nothing may be lost.” So they gathered them up, and from the fragments of the five barley loaves, left by those who had eaten, they filled twelve baskets. When the people saw the sign that he had done, they began to say, “This is indeed the prophet who is to come into the world.” When Jesus realized that they were about to come and take him by force to make him king, he withdrew again to the mountain by himself.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francis, L.J., Jones, S.H. Life in the Eucharistic Community: An Empirical Study in Psychological Type Theory and Biblical Hermeneutics Reading John 6:5–15. Pastoral Psychol 63, 281–290 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-013-0540-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-013-0540-x

Keywords

Navigation