Skip to main content
Log in

A History of Psychology of Religion in the West: Implications for Theory and Method

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of religion in Western psychology has an interesting history that provides many lessons for future attempts to understand the spiritual aspects of human experience. In the past, psychologists have typically operated from one of three paradigms in their study of religion: (1) hermeneutic–phenomenological, (2) positivistic naturalism, and (3) religious integration. Each of these paradigms has a number of important theoretical assumptions and a preferred set of methodologies that offer significant advantages and disadvantages. The paradigm of positivistic naturalism, with its emphasis on quantitative questionnaire methodology, has been the most influential but also the least helpful in generating new ideas for the psychological understanding of religion, particularly as it is practiced in non-Western contexts. A historical survey of the other competing paradigms offers many insights and practical suggestions about how research in the psychology of religion might proceed in the twenty-first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. (1970). Competent to counsel. Phillipsburg: Presbyterian and Reformed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeder, R. (2007). Pragmatism and philosophy of science: A critical survey. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, P. (1984). Rudolf Otto: An introduction to his philosophical theology. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. (1983). What is a law of nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. (1997). A world of states of affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, H. (2004). Buddhist practice on Western ground: Reconciling eastern ideals and western psychology. Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (2003). Epistemology: A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, J. (1998). Impossibility: The limits of science and the science of limits. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, T. W., & Enright, R. D. (2004). Intervention studies on forgiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belzen, J. A. (Ed.). (1997). Hermeneutical approaches in psychology of religion. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P., & Spilka, B. (1973). God image as a function of self-esteem and locus of control. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 12, 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Walnut Creek: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L., Jr., O’Connor, L. E., Parrott, L., III, & Wade, N. G. (2005). Forgivingness, vengeful rumination, and affective traits. Journal of Personality, 73, 183–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. London: Verso. Original work published 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. R. (2002). What do we really know about mindfulness-based stress reduction? Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 71–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bordogna, F. (2008). William James at the boundaries: Philosophy, science, and the geography of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. (1993). The logic of modern physics (reprint ed.). Salem: Ayer. Original work published 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. (2000). William James on radical empiricism and religion. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, D. S. (1980). Pluralism and personality: William James and some contemporary cultures of psychology. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, D. S., & Cooper, T. D. (2004). Religious thought and the modern psychologies (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capps, D. (1997). Men, religion, and melancholia: James, Otto, Jung, and Erikson. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, semantics and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1995). An introduction to the philosophy of science (M. Gardner, Ed.). New York: Dover. Original work published 1974.

  • Carrier, M. (1998). In defense of psychological laws. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 12, 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, M. (2000). How to pile up fundamental truths incessantly: On the prospect of reconciling scientific realism with unending progress. In M. Carrier, G. Massey, & L. Ruetsche (Eds.), Science at century’s end: Philosophical questions on the progress and limits of science (pp. 92–109). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. (2009). Ontological anti-realism. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: New essays on the foundations of ontology (pp. 77–129). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, J., & Slife, B. D. (2005). Epistemology and the hither side: A Levinasian account of relational knowing. European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counseling and Health, 7, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1998). Course on positive philosophy. In G. Lenzer (Ed.), Auguste Comte and positivism: The essential writings (pp. 71–306). New Brunswick: Transaction. Original work published 1830–1842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, B. (2005). Heidegger and the prospect of a phenomenology of prayer. In B. Benson & N. Wirzba (Eds.), The phenomenology of prayer (pp. 119–133). Bronx: Fordham University.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, T. (1997). Inquiry into the foundations of a hermeneutical psychology: A critique of unpure reason. In J. Belzen (Ed.), Hermeneutical approaches in psychology of religion (pp. 35–49). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, H., & DiClemente, C. (2004). Psychology’s roots: A brief history of the influence of Judeo-Christian perspectives. In W. Miller & H. Delaney (Eds.), Judeo-Christian perspectives on psychology (pp. 31–54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1989). Selected works, volume 1: Introduction to the human sciences (R. Makkreel & F. Rodi, Eds.). Princeton: Princeton University.

  • Drees, W. B. (1999). Religion, science, and naturalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupre, J. (2004). The miracle of monism. In M. De Caro & D. Macarthur (Eds.), Naturalism in question (pp. 36–58). Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edie, J. (1987). William James and phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G., & Stoeger, W. (1996). Introduction to general relativity and cosmology. In R. Russell, N. Murphy, & C. Isham (Eds.), Quantum cosmology and the laws of nature (2nd ed., pp. 35–50). Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, J. (1986). Therapeutic aims in psychotherapy and meditation. In K. Wilber, J. Engler, & D. Brown (Eds.), Transformations of consciousness: Conventional and contemplative perspectives on development (pp. 17–51). Boston: New Science Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. (2001). Forgiveness is a choice: A step-by-step process for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R., & Fitzgibbons, R. (2000). Helping clients forgive: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. (1995). Thoughts without a thinker: Psychotherapy from a Buddhist perspective. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. (1958). Young man Luther: A study in psychoanalysis and history. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. (1964). Insight and responsibility: Lectures on the ethical implications of psychoanalytical insight. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. (1966). Ontogeny of ritualization. In R. Loewenstein, L. Newman, M. Schur, & A. Solnit (Eds.), Psychoanalysis—A general psychology: Essays in honor of Heinz Hartmann (pp. 601–621). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. (1996). The Galilean sayings and the sense of “I”. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 19, 291–337. Original work published 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Hill, P., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 337–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., Campbell, W. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2004). Too proud to let go: Narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 894–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenstrom, F. (2003). A Buddhist contribution to the psychoanalytic psychology of self. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84, 1551–1568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, H. (1949). Operationism and scientific method. In H. Feigl & W. Sellars (Eds.), Readings in philosophical analysis (pp. 498–509). New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against method (3rd ed.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1991). You can fool some of the people all of the time, everything else being equal: Hedged laws. Mind, 100, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.) (J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

  • Gahde, U., & Stegmuller, W. (1986). An argument in favor of the Duehm-Quine thesis: From the structuralist point of view. In L. Hahn & P. Schilpp (Eds.), The philosophy of W. V. Quine (pp. 117–136). La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, R. (1999). The divided self of William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. (2003). Practical reason and its virtues. In M. DePaul & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology (pp. 81–107). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, G., & Stefan, M. (2007). The heavy burden of proof for ontological naturalism. In G. Gasser (Ed.), How successful is naturalism? (pp. 159–181). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Adeline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Theory and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., & Kornfield, J. (2001). Seeking the heart of wisdom: The path of insight meditation. Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. (2002a). Integrating religion and spirituality? Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. (2002b). The pyramids of sciences and humanities: Implications for the search for religious “truth”. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 1822–1838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guntrip, H. (1949). Psychology for ministers and social workers. London: Independent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guntrip, H. (1957). Psychotherapy and religion. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guntrip, H. (1969). Religion in relation to personal integration. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 42, 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker, D. (2008). On the predilections for prediction. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 59, 429–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, K. (2006). Science as a guide to metaphysics? Synthese, 149, 451–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisig, J. W. (1999). Jung, Christianity, and Buddhism. Nazan Bulletin, 23, 74–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helminiak, D. A. (1996). A scientific spirituality: The interface of psychology and theology. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. (1968). Maximal specificity and lawlikeness in probabilistic explanation. Philosophy of Science, 35, 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins-D’Alessandro, A., & Cecero, J. J. (2003). The social nature of saintliness and moral action: A view of William James’s Varieties in relation to St. Ignatius and Lawrence Kohlberg. Journal of Moral Education, 32, 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P., Pargament, K., Hood, R., McCullough, M., Swyers, J., Larson, D., et al. (2000). Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: Points of commonality, points of departure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30, 51–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R., Jr., Hill, P., & Spilka, B. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (4th ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, C. (2003). How to be a virtue epistemologist. In M. DePaul & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology (pp. 183–202). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopewell, J. (1987). Congregation: Stories and structures. Philadelphia: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1961). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Collier. Original work published 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1996a). Essays in radical empiricism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Original work published 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1996b). A pluralistic universe. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Original work published 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (2003). Pragmatism. New York: Barnes & Noble. Original work published 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (1994). A constructive relationship for religion with the science and profession of psychology: Perhaps the boldest model yet. American Psychologist, 49, 184–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. G. (1995). Embodying forgiveness: A theological analysis. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (1996). A constructive relationship for religion with the science and profession of psychology: Perhaps the boldest model yet. In E. Shafranske (Ed.), Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (pp. 113–147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (2006). Integration: defending it, describing it, doing it. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 252–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., & Butman, R. (1991). Modern psychotherapies: A comprehensive Christian appraisal. Downers Grove: InterVarsity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J., Lipworth, L., & Burney, R. (1985). The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 8, 163–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J., Massion, A., Kristeller, J., Peterson, L., Fletcher, K., Pbert, L., et al. (1992). Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 936–943.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamilar, S. (2002). A Buddhist psychology. In R. Olson (Ed.), Religious theories of personality and psychotherapy: East meets West (pp. 85–140). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. (2005). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistler, M. (2006). Causation and laws of nature. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago. Original work published 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutz, I., Borysenko, J. Z., & Benson, H. (1985). Meditation and psychotherapy: A rationale for the integration of dynamic psychotherapy, the relaxation response, and mindfulness meditation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers, volume I. (J. Worrall & G. Currie, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

  • Leary, D. (2003). A profound and radical change: How William James inspired the reshaping of American psychology. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The anatomy of impact: What makes the great works of psychology great (pp. 19–42). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leuba, J. (1912). A psychological study of religion: Its origin, function and future. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuba, J. H. (1925). The psychology of religious mysticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1986). Philosophical papers, Volume II. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1999). Papers in metaphysics and epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993a). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993b). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luyten, P., & Corveleyn, J. (2007). Attachment and religion: The need to leave our secure base: A comment on the discussion between Granqvist, Rizzuto, and Wulff. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1977). Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative and the philosophy of science. Monist, 60, 453–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marechal, J. (2004). The psychology of the mystics. (A. Thorold, Trans.). Mineola: Dover. Original work published 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt, G., Witkiewitz, K., Dillworth, T., Bowen, S., Parks, G., Macpherson, L., et al. (2004). Vipassana meditation as a treatment for alcohol and drug use disorders. In S. Hayes, V. Follette, & M. Linehan (Eds.), Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition (pp. 261–287). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masis, K. V. (2002). American Zen and psychotherapy: An ongoing dialogue. In P. Young-Eisendrath & S. Muramoto (Eds.), Awakening and insight: Zen Buddhism and psychotherapy (pp. 149–171). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E., Jr., & Rachal, K. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (1999). Religion and the forgiving personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 1141–1164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K., & Thoresen, C. (2000). The psychology of forgiveness: History, conceptual issues, and overview. In M. McCullough, K. Pargament, & C. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1–14). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMinn, M., Mood, G., & McCormick, A. (2009). Integration in the classroom: Ten teaching strategies. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulas, W. (2007). Buddhism & Western psychology: Fundamentals of integration. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 4–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P., & Weingartner, P. (2005). Laws of nature. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstrass, J. (2000). Nicholas Rescher on the limits of science. In M. Carrier, G. Massey, & L. Ruetsche (Eds.), Science at century’s end: Philosophical questions on the progress and limits of science (pp. 76–83). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. (2000). Unity and the limits of science. In M. Carrier, G. Massey, & L. Ruetsche (Eds.), Science at century’s end: Philosophical questions on the progress and limits of science (pp. 217–233). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounce, H. (1997). The two pragmatisms: From Peirce to Rorty. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muramoto, S. (2002). Buddhism, religion and psychotherapy in the world today. In P. Young-Eisendrath & S. Muramoto (Eds.), Awakening and insight: Zen Buddhism and psychotherapy (pp. 15–29). East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, N. (1998). Supervenience and nonreducibility of ethics to biology. In R. Russell, W. Stoeger, & F. Ayala (Eds.), Evolutionary and molecular biology: Scientific perspectives on divine action (pp. 463–490). Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, N. (2005). Philosophical resources for integration. In A. Dueck & C. Lee (Eds.), Why psychology needs theology: A radical reformation perspective (pp. 3–27). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, N. (2007). Naturalism and theism as competing research traditions. In G. Gasser (Ed.), How successful is naturalism? (pp. 49–75). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E., & Newman, J. (2001). Godel’s proof. (Rev. ed.). New York: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. (2006). Missed opportunities in dialogue between psychology and religion. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. (2009). Psychology, religion, and spirituality. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J., & Slife, B. D. (2006). Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34(3), 191–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J., & Slife, B. D. (in press). Theoretical and epistemological issues in the psychology of religion and spirituality. In L. Miller (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York: Oxford.

  • O’Connor, K. (1997). Reconsidering the psychology of religion: Hermeneutical approaches in the contexts of research and debate. In J. Belzen (Ed.), Hermeneutical approaches in psychology of religion (pp. 85–108). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onda, A. (2002). The development of Buddhist psychology in modern Japan. In P. Young-Eisendrath & S. Muramoto (Eds.), Awakening and insight: Zen Buddhism and psychotherapy (pp. 242–251). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. (1932). Mysticism east and west: A comparative analysis of the nature of mysticism. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. (1950). The idea of the holy (2nd ed.) (J. Harvey, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press. Original work published 1923.

  • Packer, M. (1985). Hermeneutic inquiry in the study of human conduct. American Psychologist, 40, 1081–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer, M. (1988). Hermeneutic inquiry: A response to criticisms. American Psychologist, 43, 133–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer, M. J., & Addison, R. B. (Eds.). (1989). Entering the circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research and practice. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I. (2002). Is religion nothing but…? Explaining religion versus explaining religion away. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 239–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. K. (2002). Locating Buddhism, locating psychology. In P. Young-Eisendrath & S. Muramoto (Eds.), Awakening and insight: Zen Buddhism and psychotherapy (pp. 172–186). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, A. (1993). Theology for a scientific age: Being and becoming—natural, divine, and human. Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, J. (1997). Selfhood is a process. In J. Pickering (Ed.), The authority of experience: Essays on Buddhism and psychology (pp. 152–169). Richmond: Curzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. (2001). Spiritual transcendence and the scientific study of spirituality. Journal of Rehabilitation, 67, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. (2009). Editorial. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R., Ciarrochi, J., Dy-Liacco, G., & Williams, J. (2009). The empirical and conceptual value of the spiritual transcendence and religious involvement scales for personality research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1, 162–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingleton, J. (1997). Why we don’t forgive: A biblical and object relations theoretical model for understanding failures in the forgiveness process. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25, 403–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge. Original work published 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powlison, D. (2000). A biblical counseling view. In E. Johnson & S. Jones (Eds.), Psychology and Christianity (pp. 196–225). Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powlison, D. (2001). Questions at the crossroads: The care of souls and modern psychotherapies. In M. McMinn & T. Phillips (Eds.), Care for the soul: Exploring the intersection of psychology and theology (pp. 23–61). Downers Grove: InterVarsity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powlison, D. (2003). Seeing with new eyes: Counseling and the human condition through the lens of scripture. Phillipsburg: P&R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1953). From a logical point of view. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, C. (1997). Cultural psychology and cultural methodology: Theoretical and empirical considerations. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea, M. (2002). World without design: The ontological consequences of naturalism. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1970). Scientific explanation. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1973). The coherence theory of truth. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1982). Empirical inquiry. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1999). The limits of science. (Rev. ed.). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. S., & Bergin, A. (1997). A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. S., & Bergin, A. E. (2004). A theistic spiritual strategy for psychotherapy. In P. S. Richards & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Casebook for a spiritual strategy in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 1–32). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, F. (2006). Psychology and religion: hermeneutic reflections. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 232–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action, and interpretation (J. Thompson, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another (K. Blamey, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Rizzuto, A.-M. (1974). Object relations and the formation of the image of God. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 47, 83–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzuto, A.-M. (1979). The birth of the living God: A psychoanalytic study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. C. (1997a). Introduction: Christian psychology? In R. C. Roberts & M. R. Talbot (Eds.), Limning the psyche: Explorations in Christian psychology (pp. 1–19). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. C. (1997b). Parameters of a Christian psychology. In R. C. Roberts & M. R. Talbot (Eds.), Limning the psyche: Explorations in Christian psychology (pp. 74–101). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J. (2010). The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: A quiet methodological revolution. American Psychologist, 65, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, R. (2003). Reflections on mirroring. In S. Segall (Ed.), Encountering Buddhism: Western psychology and Buddhist teachings (pp. 143–164). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1996). Psychotherapy and Buddhism: Toward an integration. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (2003). Close encounters of a new kind: Toward an integration of psychoanalysis and Buddhism. In S. Segall (Ed.), Encountering Buddhism: Western psychology and Buddhist teachings (pp. 31–60). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandage, S., & Shults, F. L. (2007). Relational spirituality and transformation: A relational integration model. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 26, 261–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, H. (2000). Metaphors and theoretical terms: Problems in referring to the mental. In M. Carrier, G. Massey & L. Ruetsche (Eds.), Science at century’s end: Philosophical questions on the progress and limits of science (pp. 193–216). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

  • Segal, Z., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2001). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z., Teasdale, J., & Williams, J. (2004). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: Theoretical rationale and empirical status. In S. Hayes, V. Follette, & M. Linehan (Eds.), Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition (pp. 45–65). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigfried, C. H. (1990). William James’s radical reconstruction of philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. H., Jr. (1992a). Adverse effects of meditation: A preliminary investigation of long-term meditators. International Journal of Psychosomatics, 39, 62–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. H., Jr. (1992b). A preliminary study of long-term meditators: Goals, effects, religious orientation, cognitions. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 24, 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slife, B. D. (2004). Taking practice seriously: Toward a relational ontology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24, 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slife, B. D., & Williams, R. N. (1995). What's behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Slife, B. D., & Reber, J. S. (2009). Is there a pervasive implicit bias against theism in psychology? Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 29(2), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slife, B. D., Wiggins, B. J., & Graham, J. T. (2005). Avoiding an EST monopoly: Toward a pluralism of methods and philosophies. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 35, 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (2007). Causation and its relation to ‘causal laws.’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 58, 659–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilka, B., & Bridges, R. (1989). Theology and psychological theory: Psychological implications of some modern theologies. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 17, 343–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. (1985). Skepticism and naturalism: Some varieties: The Woodbridge lectures, 1983. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2002). Varieties of religion today: William James revisited. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vande Kemp, H. (1996). Historical perspective: Religion and clinical psychology in America. In E. Shafranske (Ed.), Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (pp. 71–112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. (1989). Laws and symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. (2002). The empirical stance. New Haven: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Waning, A. (2002). A mindful self and beyond: Sharing in the ongoing dialogue of Buddhism and psychoanalysis. In P. Young-Eisendrath & S. Muramoto (Eds.), Awakening and insight: Zen Buddhism and psychotherapy (pp. 93–105). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergote, A. (1997). Cause and meaning: Explanation and interpretation in the psychology of religion. In J. Belzen (Ed.), Hermeneutical approaches in psychology of religion (pp. 11–34). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergote, A. (1998). Psychoanalysis, phenomenological anthropology and religion. In J. Corveleyn & D. Hutsebaut (Eds.). Leuven: Leuven University Press.

  • Vitz, P. (1977). Psychology as religion: The cult of self-worship. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

  • Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2005). In search of a common core: A content analysis of interventions to promote forgiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42, 160–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. F., & Gorsuch, R. L. (2002). Forgiveness within the Big Five personality model. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1127–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. F., & Gorsuch, R. L. (2004). Dimensions underlying sixteen models of forgiveness and reconciliation. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 32, 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B., & Shapiro, S. (2006). Mental balance and well-being: Building bridges between Buddhism and Western psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 690–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, F. (2004). Relating the psychology and theology of forgiveness. In F. Watts & L. Gulliford (Eds.), Forgiveness in context: Theology and psychology in creative dialogue (pp. 1–10). London: T & T Clark International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegela, K. K. (2003). Nurturing the seeds of sanity: A Buddhist approach to psychotherapy. In S. Mijares (Ed.), Modern psychology and ancient wisdom: Psychological healing practices from the world’s religious traditions (pp. 17–42). New York: Haworth Integrative Healing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, D., & Slife, B. D. (2009). Recent calls for Jamesian pluralism in the natural and social sciences: Will psychology heed the call? Journal of Mind and Behavior, 30(3), 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, M. (1999). Hermeneutics as epistemology. In J. Greco & E. Sosa (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to epistemology (pp. 415–435). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, D. (1998). Spiritual disciplines, spiritual formation, and the restoration of the soul. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 26, 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. G., & Swales, M. (2004). The use of mindfulness-based approaches for suicidal patients. Archives of Suicide Research, 8, 315–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Wade, N. G. (1999). The psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 385–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C., & Bechtel, W. (2007). Mechanisms and psychological explanation. In P. Thagard (Ed.), Philosophy of psychology and cognitive science (pp. 31–79). Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, D. (1997). Psychology of religion: Classic & contemporary (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarhouse, M., Butman, R., & McRay, B. (2005). Modern psychopathologies: A comprehensive Christian appraisal. Downers Grove: InterVarsity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Eisendrath, P., & Muramoto, S. (2002). Continuing a conversation from East to West: Buddhism and psychotherapy. In P. Young-Eisendrath & S. Muramoto (Eds.), Awakening and insight: Zen Buddhism and psychotherapy (pp. 1–29). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., Cole, B., Rye, M. S., Butter, E. M., Belavich, T. G., et al. (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzing the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 549–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James M. Nelson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, J.M. A History of Psychology of Religion in the West: Implications for Theory and Method. Pastoral Psychol 61, 685–710 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-011-0407-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-011-0407-y

Keywords

Navigation