Skip to main content
Log in

Obsession for National Security and the Rise of the National Security State-Industry: A Pastoral-Psychological Analysis

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, I examine, from a pastoral-psychological perspective, the U.S. obsession with national security and the corresponding rise and consequences of the military-industrial complex and national security state-industry. I argue that preoccupation with national security reflects a paranoid-schizoid (P-S) mode of organizing experience—a mode of experience supported by and represented in political policies and discourse, as well as socially shared narratives and myths. This subjective and intersubjective mode of organizing experience, which is maintained by the defenses of projection, rationalization, moralization, splitting, and denial, accompany the eclipse of the reflective function. From a theological perspective, the obsession for national security signifies both an idolatrous relationship and the presence of bad faith.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The national security industry comprises private security and intelligence gathering companies, as well as ancillary private companies that provide logistical and other services for the U.S. military and other intelligence agencies and companies (e.g., Kellogg, Brown, and Root, or KBR). The state or government is distinct from this industry, but I hyphenate state and national security industry because they are inextricably yoked together. In other words, they are interdependent, feeding off each other. Just as Eisenhower’s military-industrial complex cannot be separated from the state, so too the national security industry cannot be seen or understood as separate from both the military and the state.

  2. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ike.htm accessed 22 December 2010.

  3. http://www.vaughns-1-pagers.com/politics/us-foreign-aid.htm accessed 20 December 2010.

  4. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/foreign_commerce_aid/foreign_aid.html accessed 19 April 2009.

  5. This speech is readily available on numerous websites.

References

  • American Rhetoric. http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/search/speeches/speech_srch.html. Retrieved 22 December 2010.

  • Bacevich, A. (2002). American empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee Publishing.

  • Bacevich, A. (2005). The new American militarism. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacevich, A. (2010). Washington rules: America’s path to permanent war. New York: Metropolitan Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacevich, A. (2011). The tyranny of defense inc. The Atlantic Monthly, 307(1), 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. (2003). Enactment: Analytic musings on energy, language, and personal growth. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(5), 633–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, C. (2010). Crimes of empire. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush G. W. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/01/20080128-13.html Retrieved 10 October 2008.

  • Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2005). Imperial ambitions. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2010). Hopes and prospects. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). The repression and return of bad objects. In: Psychoanalytic studies of the personality (pp. 59–89). London: Tavistock.

  • Farley, E. (1990). Good and evil: Interpreting a human condition. Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, H. (1969). Self-deception. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. (2009). Iraqi civilian death estimates. CRS report to Congress. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RS22537.pdf. Retrieved 14 December 2010.

  • Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 679–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, B. (1988). War stars: The superweapon and the American imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1924). The dissolution of the oedipus complex. Standard Edition (Vol. 19, pp. 172–179). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2003). Destructive emotions. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, G. (1985). A theology of liberation. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstader, R. (1963). The paranoid style of American politics. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1999). Blowback. New York: Owl Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2004). Sorrows of empire. New York: Owl Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2006). Nemesis: The last days of the American republic. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2010). Dismantling the empire. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (2002). The anarchy of empire in the making of U.S. culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keylor, R. (2003). Subjectivity, infantile Oedipus, and symbolization in Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(2), 211–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzer, S. (2006). Overthrow: America’s century of regime change from Hawaii to Iraq. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1930). The importance of symbol-formation in the development of the ego. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 11, 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1949a). Contributions to psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1949b). The psychoanalysis of children. London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2007). Shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaMothe, R. (2009). The problem of patriotism: A psychoanalytic and theological analysis. Journal of Pastoral Psychology, 58, 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. J. (1979). The broken connection. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, E., & Hanauer, N. (2007). The true patriot. Seattle: Sasquatch Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, P. (1996). The politics of uncertainty. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, A. (2004). The solidarity of others in a divided world. New York: T&T Clark International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moïsi, D. (2010). The geopolitics of emotion. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, J. (1973). The gospel of liberation. Waco, TX: Word Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Public Radio. http://www.npr.org/2011/03/07/134316624/battle-over-budget-cuts-moves-to-senate. Accessed 23 May 2011.

  • Niebuhr, H. R. (1941). The meaning of revelation. New York: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. (1986). The matrix of the mind. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiger, J. (2003). Opting for the margins. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, H. (1957). Notes on symbol formation. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 38, 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, H. (1987). Silence is the real crime. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 14, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrino, J. (1984). The true church and the poor. New York: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarnoff, C. (2004). Foreign aid: an introductory overview of U.S. programs and policy. CRS report for Congress. http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/31987.pdf. Retrieved 20 December 2010.

  • Tillich, P. (1951). Systematic theology (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, P. (1957). Dynamics of faith. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, G. (1986). The decline and fall of the American empire. Tucson, AZ: Odonian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, G. (2002). Perpetual war for perpetual peace. New York: Nations Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. (1998). The twentieth century. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan LaMothe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LaMothe, R. Obsession for National Security and the Rise of the National Security State-Industry: A Pastoral-Psychological Analysis. Pastoral Psychol 61, 31–46 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-011-0380-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-011-0380-5

Keywords

Navigation