Skip to main content

Measuring Theodicy: Individual Differences in the Perception of Divine Intervention

Abstract

The attribution of control to God may have particularly interesting psychological properties. Theodicy refers to the perception of God controlling history—even the minutiae of daily events. The current study examines the psychometric properties of a new instrument, the Theodicy Scale. Results support the reliability of the brief scale when administered to college students, and some evidence is provided suggesting construct validation. Theodicy appears to represent a unitary construct and scores vary independent of social desirability bias. The absence of a relationship between Theodicy scores and simulated medical advice raises questions to be addressed in future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Allen-Burge, R., & Haley, W. E. (1997). Individual differences and surrogate medical decisions: Differing preferences for life-sustaining treatments. Aging & Mental Health, 1, 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arraras, J. I., Wright, S. J., Jusue, G., Tejedor, M., & Calvo, J. I. (2002). Coping style, locus of control, psychological distress and pain-related behaviours in cancer and other diseases. Psychology, Health, & Medicine, 7, 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, E., Fegg, M. J., Tyroller, M., Fischer, N., & Bumeder, I. (2007). Patients’ health beliefs and coping prior to autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation. European Journal of Cancer Care, 16, 156–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Brown, L. B. (1992). Theodicy: A neglected aspect of the psychology of religion. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, K., Murray, T.S., Malcarne, V.L., Brown, S.A., & Wallston, K.A. (2007). Do religious and control cognitions predict risky behavior? I. Development and validation of the alcohol-related God Locus of Control Scale for Adolescents (AGLOC-A). Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31, 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. (1984). Measurement: The boon and bane of investigating religion. American Psychologist, 39, 228–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann Jr., W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, L. (1988). Answer to Jung and coping with suffering: Job, Judaism, and Jung. In M. J. Spiegelman (Ed.), Catholicism and Jungian Psychology (pp. 213–223). Phoenix: Falcon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morojele, N. K., & Stephenson, G. M. (1992). The Minnesota Model in the treatment of addictions: A social psychological assessment of changes in beliefs and attributions. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 2, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (2005). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel-Heller, S., Matschinger, H., & Angermeyer, M. (2005). Mental disorders—who and what might help? Help seeking and treatment preferences of the lay public. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40, 167–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, W., Hall, T. W., & Edwards, K. J. (2001). Measuring religion and spirituality: Where are we and where are we going? Journal of Psychology and Theology, 29, 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slife, B. D., & Melling, B. S. (2006). Psychological method and the activity of God: Clarifications and distinctions. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 280–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., Gilhooly, K., & Walker, A. (2003). Factors influencing prescribing decisions in the treatment of depression: A social judgment theory approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steptoe, A., & Wardle, J. (2001). Locus of control and health behavior revisited. A multivariate analysis of young adults from 18 countries. British Journal of Psychologist, 92, 659–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöber, J. (2001). The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, B.R. (1989). Internal-external control expectancies: From contingency to creativity. American Psychologist, 44, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallston, K.A., Malcarne, V.L., Flores, L., Hansdottir, I., Smith, C.A., Stein, M.J., Weisman, M.H., & Clements P.J. (1999). Does God determine your health? The God Locus of Health Control Scale. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23, 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy K. Daugherty.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daugherty, T.K., West, A.M., Williams, M.C. et al. Measuring Theodicy: Individual Differences in the Perception of Divine Intervention. Pastoral Psychol 58, 43–47 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-008-0164-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-008-0164-8

Keywords

  • Control
  • Religion
  • Attribution