Skip to main content
Log in

Well-being and Spirituality from a Korean Perspective: Based on the Study of Culture and Subjective Well-being

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Criteria for well-being and spirituality are culturally bound. In this article, therefore, the notions of well-being and spirituality were reconsidered from a Korean perspective. Two major conceptual approaches that pertain to “subjective well-being” research in social psychology provide the methodological framework for this study. While “bottom-up” approaches focus on how external events and situations influence happiness, “top-down” approaches center on diverse variables within an individual and his or her culture. Noting the cultural differences between American and Korean self-construals (i.e., independence vs. interdependence), the author argues that Koreans need to construct “top-down” approaches to both well-being and spirituality. Reviewing Robert Emmon’s concept of “spiritual intelligence,” the author also suggests an integrative model for spirituality and well-being in Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, S. M. (1984). Self-knowledge and social inference: II. The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 294–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. M., & Ross, L. (1984). Self-knowledge and social inference: I. The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 280–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Gohm, C., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (2003). Culture and subjective well-being. Boston, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in personality. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (2000). Is spirituality an intelligence? Motivation, cognition, and the psychology of ultimate concern. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1996). Probing more deeply into the theory of multiple intelligence. NASSP Bull, 80, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • American heritage dictionary (2001). The American heritage dictionary (4th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakar, S. (1978). The inner world: A psychoanalytic study of childhood and society in India. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S.-Y. (2001). Codependence and interdependence: Cross-cultural reappraisal of boundaries and relationality. Pastoral Psychology, 50, 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S.-Y., & Le, A. D. (2004). Relationship building in clinical pastoral education: A Confucian reflection from Asian chaplains. Journal of Pastoral Care and Counseling, 58, 203–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieff, P. (1987). The triumph of the therapeutic: Uses of faith after Freud. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (original work published in 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988a). How do I feel about it? Informative functions of affective states. In K. Fiedler, & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognitions, and social behavior (pp. 44–62). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988b). Mood, misattributions, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, E., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1091–1102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, P. (1963). Christianity and the encounter of world religions. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 294–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soo-Young Kwon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwon, SY. Well-being and Spirituality from a Korean Perspective: Based on the Study of Culture and Subjective Well-being. Pastoral Psychol 56, 573–584 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-008-0134-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-008-0134-1

Keywords

Navigation