Skip to main content
Log in

Are Successful Applicants to the Priesthood Psychologically Healthy?

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current investigation evaluated psychological and personality profiles of successful applicants to a major Roman Catholic religious order. The MMPI-2 and 16PF were administered to 68 applicants between 1990 and 2004 who subsequently entered seminary. Results indicate that these applicants to the priesthood were generally well-adjusted as well as being socially responsible, interpersonally sensitive and sociable. Findings also suggest some tendency for defensiveness and repression. Furthermore, dealing with perceived negative impulses such as anger and hostility may also be a concern for many of these men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashbrook, J. B., & Powell, R. K. (1967). Comparison of graduating and non-graduating theological students on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 14, 171–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, S., Mooney, W. T., Mucowski, R. J., & Williams, R. (1984). Progress in the evaluation and prediction of successful candidates for religious careers. Counseling and Values, 28, 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Globe Investigative Staff. (2002). Betrayal: The crisis in the Catholic Church. NY: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K., & Cattell, H. E. P. (1993). Sixteen Personality Factors Questionnaire, Fifth Edition. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, T. P. (2003). Roman Catholic clericalism, religious duress, and clergy abuse. Pastoral Psychology, 51, 189–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. J. (1990). Priesthood: A re-examination of the Roman Catholic theology of the presbyterate. New York, NY: Alba House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekhardt, B. N., & Goldsmith, W. M. (1984). Personality factors of men and women pastoral candidates, Part 1: Motivational profiles. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 12, 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., Payne, V. J., Jones, S. H. (2001). Psychological types of male Anglican clergy in Wales. Journal of Psychological Types, 56, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gafford, J. S. (2000). Variations in psychological functioning among Roman Catholic religious professionals. (Doctoral Dissertation, Saint Louis University, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, L. (2003). Trail of pain in Church crisis leads to nearly every diocese. New York Times, January 12, 2003.

  • Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1989). Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2TM (MMPI-2TM). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, P. J., Erdberg, P., & Sammon, S. D. (1990). The psychological assessment of Catholic clergy and religious referred for residential treatment. Pastoral Psychology, 38, 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmons, S. E. (2002). Suitability and persistence in Roman Catholic religious life using the MMPI/MMPI-2 as a predictive instrument. (Doctoral Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosek, R. B. (2000). The desire for god: An assessment of seminarians’ spirituality through the lens of the “big five.” Pastoral Psychology, 49, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meloy, J. R. (1986). Narcissistic psychopathology and the clergy. Pastoral Psychology, 35, 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musson, D. J., Francis, L. J. (2002). A comparison of the psychometric properties of the 16PF4 and 16PF5 among male Anglican clergy. Pastoral Psychology, 50, 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauss, A. (1973). The ministerial personality: Myth or reality? Journal of Religion and Health, 12, 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, J. (1990). Assessment of narcissistic psychopathology in the clergy. Pastoral Psychology, 38, 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, J. (1991). Personality characteristics of male and female pastoral candidates. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 186–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plante, T. G., Manuel, G. M., & Tandez, J. (1996). Personality characteristics of successful applicants to the priesthood. Pastoral Psychology, 45, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plante, T. G. (Ed). (2004). Sin against the Innocents: Sexual Abuse by Priests and the Role of the Catholic Church. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipe, A. W. R. (2004). The crisis of sexual abuse and the celibate/sexual agenda of the Church. In T. G. Plante (Ed). Sin against the Innocents: Sexual Abuse by Priests and the Role of the Catholic Church. (pp. 61–72). Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson, J. A. (1992). Another look at pastoral canidates’ personality traits. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 20, 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas G. Plante.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plante, T.G., Aldridge, A. & Louie, C. Are Successful Applicants to the Priesthood Psychologically Healthy?. Pastoral Psychol 54, 81–90 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-005-6185-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-005-6185-7

Keywords

Navigation