Skip to main content
Log in

An Analysis of Pride Systems and the Dynamics of Faith

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pride, in Western Christianity, has long been recognized as a vice and deadly sin. In this article, individual and communal pride is understood as emerging from, and supported by, a system of hierarchical valuations, which provides a subjective and intersubjective sense of self-worth along with a sense of power and privilege. A pride system is linked to, and supported by, stories and rituals that omnipotently confirm individual and communal status and power. This complex system is accompanied by a particular faith dynamic that benefits its members, yet alienates those deemed to be of lesser value. While positive valuations support a person’s (and community’s) sense of self-esteem and are, more often than not, important for a sense of trust, group loyalty, and community, they are also accompanied by negative appraisals that are projected onto an “other.” This other is alienated from the privileges and power of those who identify with, and own, the positive valuations. Pride systems, then, are “good” to the extent that they shore up a sense of self and community and “bad,” or inherently deadly, to the extent that “goodness” depends on the subtle or overt alienation of a person or group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aho, J. (1990). The politics of righteousness. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas (trans. 1964). Summa theologica (T. Gilby, Trans, Vol. 44). New York: Blackfriars, McGraw Hill.

  • Augustine (trans. 1984). The city of God (H. Bettenson, Trans.). New York: Penguin Classics.

  • Baasten, M. (1986). Pride according to Gregory the Great. Queenstown: Edwin Mellon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkun, M. (1994). Religion and the racist right. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E. (1973). Denial of death. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E. (1975). Escape from evil. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, A. (1958). On arrogance. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 144–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassian, J. (trans. 1985). Conferences (C. Luinheid, Trans.). New York: Paulist Press.

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Power/Knowledge (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1961). Civilization and its discontents. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 64–148). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1930)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghent, E. (1990). Masochism, submission, surrender. Contemporary psychoanalysis, 26, 108–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. (1994). Warrior dreams. New York: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, A. (1964). The autobiography of Malcolm X. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakes, J. (2002). Charleston. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1978). The search for the self (P. Ornstein, Ed.,). New York: International Universities Press.Vol.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroda, K. (1999). Seduction, surrender, and transformation: Emotional engagement in the analytic process. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, V. (1985). Women priests and other fantasies. Norwell, MA: Christopher Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. (1981). The drama of the gifted child. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L. (1960). Pride and its relation to narcissism, autonomy and identity. Bulletin of the Meninger Clinic, 24(1), 136–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, D. (1992). Shame and pride: Affect, sex, and the birth of the self. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Dunfee, S. (1982). The sin of hiding: A feminist critique of Rheinhold Neibuhr’s account of the sin of pride. Soundings, 65, 316–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H. R. (1989). Faith on earth. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahner, K. (1984). A way to faith. In K. Rahner (Ed.), The encyclopedia of theology: The concise sacramentum mundi. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuther, R. R. (1983). Sexism and God talk. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, O. A. (1990). Pride produces the idea of Self: Hume on moral agency. Australian Journal of Philosophy, 68(3), 255–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, A. (1988). Envy, identification, and pride. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 57, 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, D. (2000). Pride as sin and virtue. Studies in Religion, 29(2), 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmel, S. (1992). The seven deadly sins. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza (trans. 1994). A Spinoza reader: The ethics and other works (E. Curley, Ed. & Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Tillich, P. (1957). The dynamics of faith. New York: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan LaMothe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LaMothe, R. An Analysis of Pride Systems and the Dynamics of Faith. Pastoral Psychol 53, 239–253 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-004-0555-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-004-0555-4

Navigation