Advertisement

Characterisation of Growth and Ultrastructural Effects of the Xanthoria elegans Photobiont After 1.5 Years of Space Exposure on the International Space Station

  • Annette Brandt
  • Eva Posthoff
  • Jean-Pierre de Vera
  • Silvano Onofri
  • Sieglinde Ott
Astrobiology

Abstract

The lichen Xanthoria elegans has been exposed to space and simulated Mars-analogue environment in the Lichen and Fungi Experiment (LIFE) on the EXPOSE-E facility at the International Space Station (ISS). This long-term exposure of 559 days tested the ability of various organisms to cope with either low earth orbit (LEO) or Mars-analogue conditions, such as vacuum, Mars-analogue atmosphere, rapid temperature cycling, cosmic radiation of up to 215 ± 16 mGy, and insolation of accumulated doses up to 4.87 GJm−2, including up to 0.314 GJm−2 of UV irradiation. In a previous study, X. elegans demonstrated considerable resistance towards these conditions by means of photosynthetic activity as well as by post-exposure metabolic activity of 50–80 % in the algal and 60–90 % in the fungal symbiont (Brandt et al. Int J Astrobiol 14(3):411–425, 2015). The two objectives of the present study were complementary: First, to verify the high post-exposure viability by using a qualitative cultivation assay. Second, to characterise the cellular damages by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) which were caused by the space and Mars-analogue exposure conditions of LIFE. Since the algal symbiont of lichens is considered as the more susceptible partner (de Vera and Ott 2010), the analyses focused on the photobiont. The study demonstrated growth and proliferation of the isolated photobiont after all exposure conditions of LIFE. The ultrastructural analysis of the algal cells provided an insight to cellular damages caused by long-term exposure and highlighted that desiccation-induced breakdown of cellular integrity is more pronounced under the more severe space vacuum than under Mars-analogue atmospheric conditions. In conclusion, desiccation-induced damages were identified as a major threat to the photobiont of X. elegans. Nonetheless, a fraction of the photobiont cells remained cultivable after all exposure conditions tested in LIFE.

Keywords

Astrobiology Expose-E Life Lichen Space conditions Mars-analogue conditions 

Abbreviations

ISS

International Space Station

LEO

low Earth orbit

LIFE

Lichen and Fungi Experiment

MGR

Mission Ground Reference

T

transmission

TEM

transmission electron microscopy

UV

ultraviolet radiation

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi) and the German Aerospace Centre (DLR) for funding the work of Annette Brandt (50BW1216) and J.-P. de Vera (50WB0614). Our special thanks are due to ESA and to the simulation facilities at DLR Cologne, especially Elke Rabbow, for MGR simulation, sample integration, and for invaluable advice. We would also like to thank Joachim Meeßen for stimulating and critical discussions. Moreover, we thank the anonymous reviewers for constructive feedback.

References

  1. Ahmadjian V (1967) A guide to the algae occurring as lichen symbionts: isolation, culture, cultural physiology, and identification. Phycologia 6(2):127–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ascaso C, Brown DH, Rapsch S (1988) The effect of desiccation on the pyrenoid structure in the oceanic lichen Parmelia laevigata. Lichenologist 20(1):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ascaso C, Valladares F, de los Ríos A (1995) New ultrastructural aspects of pyrenoids of the lichen photobiont Trebouxia (Mikrothamniales, Chlorophyta). J Phycol 31(1):114–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baqué M, Scalzi G, Rabbow E, Rettberg P, Billi D (2013) Biofilm and planktonic lifestyles differently support the resistance of the desert cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis under space and Martian simulations. Orig Life Evol Biosph 43(4–5):377–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger T, Hajek M, Bilski P, Körner C, Vanhavere F, Reitz G (2012) Cosmic radiation exposure of biological test systems during the EXPOSE-E mission. Astrobiology 12(5):387–392PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown DH, Ascaso C, Rapsch S (1987) Ultrastructural changes in the pyrenoid of the lichen Parmelia sulcata stored under controlled conditions. Protoplasma 136(2–3):136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandt A, de Vera JP, Onofri S, Ott S (2015) Viability of the lichen Xanthoria elegans and its symbionts after 18 months of space exposure and simulated Mars conditions on the ISS. Int J Astrobiol 14(3):411–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cockell CS, Rettberg P, Rabbow E, Olsson-Francis K (2011) Exposure of phototrophs to 548 days in low earth orbit: microbial selection pressures in outer space and on early Earth. Isme J 5(10):1671–1682PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowe JH, Hoekstra FA, Crowe LM (1992) Anhydrobiosis. Annu Rev Physiol 54(1):579–599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. de la Torre NR, Sancho LG, Pintado A, Rettberg P, Rabbow E, Panitz C, Deutschmann U, Reina M, Horneck G (2007) BIOPAN experiment LICHENS on the foton M2 mission: Pre-flight verification tests of the Rhizocarpon geographicum-granite ecosystem. Adv Space Res 40(11):1665–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de la Torre R, Sancho LG, Horneck G, de los Ríos A, Wierzchos J, Olsson-Francis K, Cockell CS, Rettberg P, Berger T, de Vera JP, Ott S, Frías JM, Gonzalez PM, Lucas MM, Reina M, Pintado A, Demets R (2010) Survival of lichens and bacteria exposed to outer space conditions–results of the LITHOPANSPERMIA experiments. Icarus 208(2):735–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de la Vega UP, Rettberg P, Reitz G (2007) Simulation of the environmental climate conditions on Martian surface and its effect on Deinococcus radiodurans. Adv Space Res 40(11):1672–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de los Ríos A, Wierzchos J, Sancho LG, Ascaso C (2004) Exploring the physiological state of continental Antarctic endolithic microorganisms by microscopy. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 50(3):143–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. de los Ríos A, Ascaso C, Wierzchos J (2010) Study of lichens with different state of hydration by the combination of low temperature scanning electron and confocal laser scanning microscopies. Int Microbiol 2(4):251–257Google Scholar
  15. de Vera JP, Horneck G, Rettberg P, Ott S (2003) The potential of the lichen symbiosis to cope with extreme conditions of outer space–I. Influence of UV radiation and space vacuum on the vitality of lichen symbiosis and germination capacity. Int J Astrobiol 1(4):285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Vera JP, Horneck G, Rettberg P, Ott S (2004a) The potential of the lichen symbiosis to cope with the extreme conditions of outer space–II: germination capacity of lichen ascospores in response to simulated space conditions. Adv Space Res 33(8):1236–1243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. de Vera JP, Horneck G, Rettberg P, Ott S (2004b) In the context of panspermia: may lichens serve as shuttles for their bionts in space? In: Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Exo-Astrobiology, 18–20 Nov 2003, Madrid, ESA SP-545, ESA ESTEC, The Netherlands, pp. 197–198Google Scholar
  18. de Vera JP, Rettberg P, Ott S (2008) Life at the limits: capacities of isolated and cultured lichen symbionts to resist extreme environmental stresses. Orig Life Evol Biosph 38(5):457–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. de Vera JP, Möhlmann D, Butina F, Lorek, A., Wernecke, R. & Ott S (2010) Survival potential and photosynthetic activity of lichens under Mars-like conditions: a laboratory study. Astrobiology 10(2):215–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. de Vera JP, Ott S (2010) Resistance of symbiotic eukaryotes. Survival to simulated space conditions and asteroid impact cataclysms. In: Seckbach J, Grube M (eds) Symbioses and Stress: Joint ventures in biology. Springer, Netherlands, pp. 595–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gauslaa Y, Solhaug KA (2004) Photoinhibition in lichens depends on cortical characteristics and hydration. Lichenologist 36(2):133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gauslaa Y, McEvoy M (2005) Seasonal changes in solar radiation drive acclimation of the sun-screening compound parietin in the lichen Xanthoria parietina. Basic Appl Ecol 6(1):75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hájek J, Váczi P, Barták M, Jahnová L (2012) Interspecific differences in cryoresistance of lichen symbiotic algae of genus Trebouxia assessed by cell viability and chlorophyll fluorescence. Cryobiology 64(3):215–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Honegger R (2003) The impact of different long‐term storage conditions on the viability of lichen‐forming ascomycetes and their green algal photobiont, Trebouxia spp. Plant Biology 5(3):324–330Google Scholar
  25. Honegger R, Peter M, Scherrer S (1996) Drought-induced structural alterations at the mycobiont-photobiont interface in a range of foliose macrolichens. Protoplasma 190(3–4):221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horneck G, Stöffler D, Ott S, Hornemann U, Cockell CS, Moeller R, Meyer C, de Vera JP, Fritz J, Schade S, Artemieva NA (2008) Microbial rock inhabitants survive hypervelocity impacts on Mars-like host planets: first phase of lithopanspermia experimentally tested. Astrobiology 8(1):17–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Horneck G, Klaus DM, Mancinelli RL (2010) Space microbiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74(1):121–156PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Horneck G, Moeller R, Cadet J, Douki T, Mancinelli RL, Nicholson WL, Panitz C, Rabbow E, Rettberg P, Spry A, Stackebrandt E, Vaishampayan P, Venkateswaran KJ (2012) Resistance of bacterial endospores to outer space for planetary protection purposes—experiment PROTECT of the EXPOSE-E mission. Astrobiology 12(5):445–456PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kappen L (1988) Ecophysiological relationships in different climatic regions. Handbook of Lichenology 2:37–100Google Scholar
  30. Kranner I, Beckett R, Hochman A, Nash III TH (2008) Desiccation-tolerance in lichens: a review. Bryologist 111(4):576–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meeßen J, Sánchez FJ, Brandt A, Balzer EM, de la Torre R, Sancho LG, de Vera JP, Ott S (2013a) Extremotolerance and resistance of lichens: comparative studies on five species used in astrobiological research I. Morphological and anatomical characteristics. Orig Life Evol Biosph 43(3):283–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Meeßen J, Sánchez FJ, Sadowsky A, de la Torre R, Ott S, de Vera JP (2013b) Extremotolerance and resistance of lichens: comparative studies on five species used in astrobiological research II. Secondary lichen compounds. Orig Life Evol Biosph 43(6):501–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Meeßen J, Backhaus T, Sadowsky A, Mrkalj M, Sánchez FJ, de la Torre R, Ott S (2014) Effects of UVC 254 nm on the photosynthetic activity of photobionts from the astrobiologically relevant lichens Buellia frigida and Circinaria gyrosa. Int J Astrobiol 13(4):340–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nybakken L, Solhaug KA, Bilger W, Gauslaa Y (2004) The lichens Xanthoria elegans and Cetraria islandica maintain a high protection against UV-B radiation in Arctic habitats. Oecologia 140(2):211–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Olsson-Francis K, de la Torre R, Cockell CS (2010) Isolation of novel extreme-tolerant cyanobacteria from a rock-dwelling microbial community by using exposure to low Earth orbit. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(7):2115–2121PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Onofri S, Selbmann L, Zucconi L, Pagano S (2004) Antarctic microfungi as models for exobiology. Planet Space Sci 52(1):229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Onofri S, de la Torre R, de Vera JP, Ott S, Zucconi L, Selbmann L, Scalzi G, Vankateswaran KJ, Rabbow E, Sánchez Iñigo FJ, Horneck G (2012) Survival of rock-colonizing organisms after 1.5 years in outer space. Astrobiology 12(5):508–516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Øvstedal DO, Lewis Smith RI (2001) Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia. Cambridge University Press, pp. 361–363Google Scholar
  39. Rabbow E, Rettberg P, Barczyk S, Bohmeier M, Parpart A, Panitz C, Horneck G, von Heise-Rotenburg R, Hoppenbrouwers T, Willnecker R, Baglioni P, Demets R, Dettmann J, Reitz G (2012) EXPOSE-E: an ESA astrobiology mission 1.5 years in space. Astrobiology 12(5):374–386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Raggio J, Pintado A, Ascaso C, de la Torre R, de los Ríos A, Wierzchos J, Horneck G, Sancho LG (2011) Whole lichen thalli survive exposure to space conditions: results of LITHOPANSPERMIA experiment with Aspicilia fruticulosa. Astrobiology 11(4):281–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. RedShift Report: Reviewers: van Bavinchove C, Beuselinck T (2011) EXPOSE: Environmental history by calculation - EXPOSE-E simulation results. Ref: EXP-RP-017-RS ISS. A(2). RedShift Design and Engineering BVBA (125 pp)Google Scholar
  42. Sánchez FJ, Mateo-Martí E, Raggio J, Meeßen J, Martínez-Frías J, Sancho LG, Ott S, de la Torre R (2012) The resistance of the lichen Circinaria gyrosa (nom. Provis.) towards simulated Mars conditions—a model test for the survival capacity of an eukaryotic extremophile. Planet Space Sci 72(1):102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sánchez FJ, Meeßen J, Ruiz M, Sancho LG, Ott S, Vílchez C, Horneck G, Sadowsky A, de la Torre R (2014) UV-C tolerance of symbiotic Trebouxia sp. in the space-tested lichen species Rhizocarpon geographicum and Circinaria gyrosa: role of the hydration state and cortex/screening substances. Int J Astrobiol 13(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sancho LG, de la Torre R, Horneck G, Ascaso C, de los Ríos A, Pintado A, Wierzchos J, Schuster M (2007) Lichens survive in space: results from the 2005 LICHENS experiment. Astrobiology 7(3):443–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Scalzi G, Selbmann L, Zucconi L, Rabbow E, Horneck G, Albertano P, Onofri S (2012) LIFE experiment: isolation of cryptoendolithic organisms from Antarctic colonized sandstone exposed to space and simulated Mars conditions on the International Space Station. Orig Life Evol Biosph 42(2–3):253–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Solhaug KA, Gauslaa Y (1996) Parietin, a photoprotective secondary product of the lichen Xanthoria parietina. Oecologia 108(3):412–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Solhaug KA, Gauslaa Y, Nybakken L, Bilger W (2003) UV-induction of sun-screening pigments in lichens. New Phytol 158(1):91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Solhaug KA, Larsson P, Gauslaa Y (2010) Light screening in lichen cortices can be quantified by chlorophyll fluorescence techniques for both reflecting and absorbing pigments. Planta 231(5):1003–1011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Stöffler D, Horneck G, Ott S, Hornemann U, Cockell CS, Moeller R, Meyer C, de Vera JP, Fritz J, Artemieva NA (2007) Experimental evidence for the potential impact ejection of viable micro-organisms from Mars and Mars-like planets. Icarus 186(2):585–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annette Brandt
    • 1
  • Eva Posthoff
    • 1
  • Jean-Pierre de Vera
    • 2
  • Silvano Onofri
    • 3
  • Sieglinde Ott
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of BotanyHeinrich-Heine-University (HHU)DuesseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Planetary ResearchGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)BerlinGermany
  3. 3.Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences (DEB)Tuscia UniversityViterboItaly

Personalised recommendations