Abstract
Given the rising worldwide need for food, both in terms of quantity and quality, agricultural renewal is becoming more essential. Consequently, agricultural machine learning is required to increase production. The most important activity that farmers must complete is cultivating their fields. Agriculture must adhere to strict water resource usage guidelines. Precision irrigation locates and fulfils the irrigation needs of plants. Understanding the dynamics of soil humidity requires sophisticated models of soil–plant-atmosphere systems, which are complicated systems. In light of this, the objective of this article is to assess the recent modifications to growing-season characteristics that are significant to agriculture, such as the commencement of the growing season, the length of the growth period, and the region of the season’s maximal elevation. According to the season and region they wish to sow their seeds in, the suggested strategy helps farmers choose the right crops. Using support vector classifier and KNN classifier 99% and 97% experimental results of soil humidity deficit demonstrate that the recommended. We were able to differentiate the distinct influences of humidity based on the country or location at the start of the season, identifying both positive and negative trends globally. We investigated the association between the amount of food produced and the peak of the growing season in irrigated agriculture. The electrochemical sensors, which track changes in the soil, environment, and plant directly, impact plant growth. Soil moisture sensors were positioned at 10, 20, and 35 cm depths to forecast the amount of water in the soil throughout a crop. This unique research and its promising results give a crucial contribution to the answer to the problem of anticipating and controlling groundwater for farmed use sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The dataset used for the findings is included in the manuscript.
References
Afrin, S., Khan, A.T., Mahia, M., Ahsan, R., Mishal, M.R., Ahmed, W., Rahman, R.M: Analys is of soil properties and climatic data to predict crop yields and cluster different agricultural regions of Bangladesh. In: IEEE/ACIS 17th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), pp. 80–85. IEEE (2018)
Awasthi, A., Reddy, S.R.N.: Monitoring for precision agriculture using wireless sensor network-a review. Glob. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. Netw. Web Secur. 13(7), 1–7 (2013)
Gillespie, T.J., Sutton, J.C.: A predictive scheme for timing fungicide applications to control Alternaria leaf blight in carrots. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 1, 95–99 (1979)
Gowda, S., Reddy, S.: Design and implementation of crop yield prediction model in agriculture. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 8, 544 (2020)
Gumestad, N.C., Enz, J.W., Preston, D.A., Secor, G.A.: Late blight forecasting and dissemination system using an automated weather monitoring system. Phytophthora 150, 209–213 (1995)
Gümüşçü, A., Tenekeci, M.E., Bilgili, A.V.: Estimation of wheat planting date using machine learning algorithms based on available climate data. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2019.01.010
Gupta, A.S.: Need of smart water systems in India. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 11, 2216–2223 (2016)
Hanemann, M., Young, M.: Water rights reform and water marketing: Australia vs the US West. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 36(1), 108–131 (2020)
Kone, C.T., et al.: Performance management of IEEE 802.15.4 wireless sensor network for precision agriculture. IEEE Sens. J. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2442259
Mittal, S., et al.: Effects of environmental pesticides on the health of rural communities in the Malwa Region of Punjab, India: a review. Human Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 20, 366–387 (2013)
Norhisham, A.R., Abood, F., Rita, M., Hakeem, K.R.: Effect of humidity on egg hatchability and reproductive biology of the bamboo borer (Dinoderus minutus Fabricius). Springerplus 2, 2–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-2. (PMID:23459680)
Pant, J., Pant, R.P., Singh, M.K., Singh, D.P., Pant, H.: Analysis of agricultural crop yield prediction using statistical techniques of machine learning. Mater. Today Proc. 46(20), 10922–10926 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.948
Pelegrí-Sebastia, J., et al.: Low-cost capacitive humidity sensor for application within flexible RFID labels based on microcontroller systems. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 61(2), 545–553 (2012)
Ruiz-Garcia, L., et al.: A review of wireless sensor technologies and application in agriculture and food industry: state of the art and current trends. Sensors 9(6), 4728–4750 (2009)
Sakthipriya, S., Naresh, R.: Effective energy estimation technique to classify the nitrogen and temperature for crop yield based green house application. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2022.100687
Seelan, S.K., et al.: Remote sensing applications for precision agriculture: a learning community approach. Remote Sens. Environ. 88(1–2), 157–169 (2023)
Soode, E., Lampert, P., Weber-Blaschke, G., Richter, K.: Carbon footprints of the horticultural products strawberries, asparagus, roses and orchids in Germany. J. Clean. Prod. 87, 168–179 (2015)
Tamiru, A., Getu, E., Jembere, B., Bruce, T.: Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the development and fecundity of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 102, 9–15 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485311000307. (PMID:21672294)
Thaler, S., Brocca, L., Ciabatta, L., Eitzinger, J., Hahn, S., Wagner, W.: Effects of different spatial precipitation input data on crop model outputs under a Central European climate. Atmosphere 9, 290 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9080290
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, methodology, software—SS, validation -RN; formal analysis, investigation, resources, RN; data curation, writing—original draft preparation, SS; writing—review and editing RN; visualization, supervision, RN; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts/competing of interest.
Ethical approval
All Samples were identified and used for experiments voluntarily and received a small compensation. The participants provide their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sakthipriya, S., Naresh, R. Precision agriculture: crop yields classification techniques in thermo humidity sensors. Opt Quant Electron 56, 350 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05907-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05907-1