Seeing double: Leonardo’s Mona Lisa twin

Abstract

The conventional scientific tests employed in authenticating paintings are useful in excluding a work if, for a particular artist, incorrect parameters are discovered. For example, the date may be wrong (e.g., radio carbon dating), a pigment may be wrong (e.g., modern formulation), or an implausible underpainting or sketch may be revealed (e.g., X-ray or IR image). In contradistinction, an original approach is proposed to identify individual “fingerprints” for particular artists’ hands (brushwork). It entails extracting luminosity histogram statistics of a painting in order to quantify its sfumato/chiaroscuro properties for either entire compositions or particular features (e.g., eyes, noses, or lips.) It is proposed that a work may be associated with a particular artist, rather than be excluded from the generally accepted body of work. Paintings by Leonardo and Rembrandt as well as pertinent copies and forgeries are employed as test cases. Luminosity histogram statistics for several contemporary paintings are also included to enlarge the data library. In order to illustrate the utility of this approach in characterizing and identifying an artist’s technique, particular attention was addressed to the issue of the possibility of two individual Mona Lisa portraits by Leonardo. This focused on an analysis of the properties of a painting formerly known as the Pulitzer/Isleworth Portrait and, subsequently, as the “Earlier Mona Lisa, EML” by Leonardo da Vinci, after protracted scientific, historic, aesthetic, and geometric investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Asmus, J.F.: Computer studies of the Isleworth and Louvre Mona Lisas. Opt. Eng. 28(7), 800–804 (1989)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asmus, J.F.: Computer studies of the Isleworth and Louvre Mona Lisas. SPIE Milestone Ser. MS 13, 652–656 (1990)

  3. Asmus, J.F.: Computer image studies of rembrandt self portraits. Hum. Vis. III 1666, 436–445 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asmus, J.F., Katz, N.F.: Digital image processing applied to problems of art and architecture. Appl. Digit. Image Process. XI 974, 278–282 (1988)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Asmus, J.F., et al.: Computer enhancement of the Mona Lisa. Perspect. Comput. 7, 11–22 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, K.: Leonardo da Vinci. Univ. Press, Cambridge (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, K.: Mona Lisa. Burlington Magazine Press, Cambridge (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gombrich, E.H.: The Story of Art. Phaidon, London (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McMullen, R.: Mona Lisa. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pedretti, C.: Leonardo: A Study in Chronology and Style. Univ. of Cal. Press, Berkeley (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Mona Lisa Foundation: Leonardo da Vinci’s Earlier Mona Lisa. The Mona Lisa Foundation, Zurich (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. F. Asmus.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Fundamentals of Laser Assisted Micro- and Nanotechnologies.

Guest edited by Eugene Avrutin, Vadim Veiko, Tigran Vartanyan and Andrey Belikov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asmus, J.F., Parfenov, V.A. & Elford, J.P. Seeing double: Leonardo’s Mona Lisa twin. Opt Quant Electron 48, 555 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-016-0799-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mona Lisa
  • Gioconda
  • Leonardo
  • Art
  • Image processing
  • Earlier Mona Lisa
  • Isleworth
  • Histogram
  • Brushwork