Abstract
PARETO is an optimization framework for onshore produced water management that is meant to empower practitioners, researchers, and policymakers to identify cost-effective and environmentally sustainable ways to manage, treat, and - when possible - beneficially reuse produced water from oil & gas operations. Given user-provided water production, demand, and transportation data, PARETO can help determine where and how to build out produced water infrastructure while simultaneously improving the coordination of water deliveries over time. The framework is innately designed to help organizations recognize opportunities for minimizing fresh and brackish water consumption by maximizing produced water reuse in active oil & gas development areas. PARETO is Python-based and is publicly available via GitHub.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad F, Adhami AY, Smarandache F (2019) Neutrosophic optimization model and computational algorithm for optimal shale gas water management under uncertainty. Symmetry. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11040544
Al-Aboosi FY, El-Halwagi MM (2019) A stochastic optimization approach to the design of shale gas/oil wastewater treatment systems with multiple energy sources under uncertainty. Sustainability 11(18):4865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184865
Cafaro DC, Grossmann I (2021) Optimal design of water pipeline networks for the development of shale gas resources. AIChE Journal 67(1):e17058. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17058
Carrero-Parreño A, Reyes-Labarta JA, Salcedo-Díaz R, Ruiz-Femenia R, Onishi VC, Caballero JA, Grossmann IE (2018) Holistic planning model for sustainable water management in the shale gas industry. Ind Eng Chem Res 57(39):13131–13143. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b02055
EQT Corporation (2019) Earnings Update. https://s24.q4cdn.com/922296017/files/doc_presentations/EQT_Analyst_Presentation-April_25_2019_.pdf
Drouven, M. G., & Wahl, M. (2021) DOE’s NETL, LBNL and Olympus Energy collaborate on produced water optimization. https://netl.doe.gov/node/11322
Drouven MG, Grossmann IE (2017) Optimization models for impaired water management in active shale gas development areas. J Petrol Sci Eng 156:983–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.032
Drouven, M. G. (2018). Optimization Engineering at EQT. https://pubsonline.informs.org/do/https://doi.org/10.1287/orms.2018.06.07/full/
Drouven, M. G. (2021). DOE’s Produced water optimization initiative. https://netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/rdfactsheet/R-D228%20-%20Produced%20Water%20Optimization%20Initiative.pdf
Ghurye GL, Mishra D, Lucas L (2021) Thermal desalination of produced water—An analysis of the partitioning of constituents into product streams and its implications for beneficial reuse outside the O&G industry. Water 13(1068):1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081068
Guerra OJ, Calderón AJ, Papageorgiou LG, Siirola JJ, Reklaitis GV (2016) An optimization framework for the integration of water management and shale gas supply chain design. Comput Chem Eng 92:230–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.03.025
Guerra OJ, Calderón AJ, Papageorgiou LG, Reklaitis GV (2019) Integrated shale gas supply chain design and water management under uncertainty. AIChE J 65(3):924–936. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16476
Hart WE, Laird CD, Watson JP, Woodruff DL, Hackebeil GA, Nicholson BL, Siirola JD (2017) Pyomo-Optimization Modeling in Python, vol 67. Springer, Cham
IHS Markit News Release (2020). Produced Water from Onshore US Oil and Gas Activities to Decline to Nearly 20 Billion Barrels Annually. https://news.ihsmarkit.com/prviewer/release_only/slug/2020-04-02-produced-water-from-onshore-us-oil-and-gas-activities-to-decline-to-nearly-20-billion-barrels-annually-reach-28-billion-in-value-by-2022-ihs-markit-says#:~:text=HOUSTON%20(April%202%2C%202020),in%20critical%20information%2C%20analytics%20and
Lee A, Ghouse JH, Eslick JC, Laird CD, Siirola JD, Zamarripa MA, Gunter D, Shinn JH, Dowling AW, Bhattacharyya D, Biegler LT, Burgard AP, Miller DC (2021) The IDAES process modeling framework and model library—Flexibility for process simulation and optimization. J Adv Manuf Process 3(3):e10095. https://doi.org/10.1002/amp2.10095
Lira-Barragán LF, Ponce-Ortega JM, Guillén-Gosálbez G, El-Halwagi MM (2016) Optimal water management under uncertainty for shale gas production. Ind Eng Chem Res 55(5):1322–1335. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02748
López-Díaz DC, Lira-Barragán LF, Rubio-Castro E, You F, Ponce-Ortega JM (2018) Optimal design of water networks for shale gas hydraulic fracturing including economic and environmental criteria. Clean Technol Environ Policy 20(10):2311–2332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1611-6
Oke D, Mukherjee R, Sengupta D, Majozi T, El-Halwagi MM (2019) Optimization of water-energy nexus in shale gas exploration: from production to transmission. Energy 183:651–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.104
Ren K, Tang X, Jin Y, Wang J, Feng C, Höök M (2019) Bi-objective optimization of water management in shale gas exploration with uncertainty: a case study from Sichuan, China. Resour Conserv Recycl 143:226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.003
Tavakkoli S, Lokare O, Vidic R, Khanna V (2020) Shale gas produced water management using membrane distillation: an optimization-based approach. Resour Conserv Recycl 158:10403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104803
Yang L, Grossmann IE, Manno J (2014) Optimization models for shale gas water management. AIChE J 60(10):3490–3501. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14526
Yang L, Grossmann IE, Mauter MS, Dilmore RM (2015) Investment optimization model for freshwater acquisition and wastewater handling in shale gas production. AIChE J 61(6):1770–1782. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14804
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to recognize the contributions of the greater PARETO team to the development of PARETO, and the numerous contributors to the model libraries and associated tools. PARETO is supported through the Advanced Remediation Technologies Program within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management.
Funding
This project was funded by the United States Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, in part, through a site support contract. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor the support contractor, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drouven, M.G., Caldéron, A.J., Zamarripa, M.A. et al. PARETO: An open-source produced water optimization framework. Optim Eng 24, 2229–2249 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-022-09773-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-022-09773-w