Skip to main content
Log in

A real-world mine excavators timetabling methodology in open-pit mining

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Optimization and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the literature of mining optimisation, most classical mine block sequencing or open-pit mine production scheduling problems are applied at strategic and tactical levels, because their objectives are to determine the optimal sequence of mineral blocks across a certain number of fixed time-length periods (measured in weeks, months or years) such that the total revenue is maximised. The application of continuous-time machine scheduling theory to mine equipment timetabling is challenging and rare in the current mining literature. In this study, inspired by microscopic scheduling requirements (measured in hours, minutes and seconds) in the iron ore open-pit mining industry, a new short-term Mine Excavators Timetabling (MET) problem is introduced and defined. The MET simultaneously assigns mine blocks to excavators and decides the sequencing of assigned blocks for each excavator so that the detailed scheduling of starting and completion time for excavation of each block is determined. Different from discrete periods in the classical mining optimisation problems, timing factors in the proposed MET are continuous and precise. The proposed MET aims at minimising the total weighted tardiness (delay cost) and the total weighted movement time (relocation cost) at the operational level. By analysing the key characteristics of excavating operations, the MET problem is transformed into a specific type of continuous-time machine scheduling problem, which is an innovative application to operational-level mining equipment management. Based on extensive computational experiments by mixed integer programming, a dominance-based constructive algorithm and a hybrid Tabu-Search Threshold-Accepting metaheuristic algorithm, theoretical insights and practical benefits are discussed in depth for real-world implementations. In comparison to the exact MIP solver (ILOG-CPLEX), computational experiments indicate that the proposed hybrid metaheuristic can obtain the same optimal solutions of small-size instances but with over 240 times less computational time. For solving medium-size instances, the proposed hybrid metaheuristic also outperforms ILOG-CPLEX in both solution quality and computational times (10.94 times better solution with 38.36 times less computational time on average). A sensitivity analysis under different scenarios is conducted to determine the saturation number of excavators with the best cost-effectiveness ratio in a demand-responsive scheduling horizon. The result analyses validate that the implementation of the optimised extraction timetable can significantly reduce the total relocation cost of excavators for large-size instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MDP:

Mine design planning

UPIT:

Ultimate pit limit

CPIT:

Constrained pit limit

MBS:

Mine block sequencing

OPBS:

Open-pit block sequencing

OPMPS:

Open-pit mine production scheduling

PCPSP:

Precedence-constrained production scheduling problem

MET:

Mine excavators timetabling

SDMT:

Sequence-dependent movement time

TS:

Tabu search

TA:

Threshold accepting

SA:

Simulated annealing

MIP:

Mixed integer programming

ILOG-CPLEX:

A commercial MIP solver software developed by IBM

MET-CA:

A construction algorithm for MET

MET-HMA:

A hybrid metaheuristic algorithm for MET

A Block Unit:

A block unit is regarded as the smallest element with the same size in a strategic-level 3D pit-design block model (e.g., 15 m * 15 m * 10 m for an open-pit iron ore mine, namely, 15 m in width, 15 m in length and 10 m in height) in MDP or MBS models

A Block:

Also called “an operational-level extraction block” that is equivalent to “an extraction job” in our MET model. Note that such “an operational-level extraction block” is an aggregation of strategic-level block units that are assigned into the same discrete tactical-level mid-term period and ready for excavating on the same active working bench of a pit

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71871064 with the title “Advanced scheduling methodologies to optimise mining operations”) and the CRC ORE established by the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shi Qiang Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, S.Q., Kozan, E., Corry, P. et al. A real-world mine excavators timetabling methodology in open-pit mining. Optim Eng 24, 1493–1535 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-022-09741-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-022-09741-4

Keywords

Navigation