Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of a static mixing device using the continuous adjoint to a two-phase mixing model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Optimization and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The continuous adjoint method is formulated and utilized for the optimization of a static mixing device. The CFD tool used for the simulations is based on a two-phase model governing flows of two miscible fluids. The formulation of the corresponding continuous adjoint problem is presented and the computed gradients are utilized in an optimization loop. In specific, a multi-objective optimization problem is formulated and solved for maximum mixture uniformity at the outlet and minimum total pressure losses inside a static mixing device. The weighted sum of these two quantities of interest is the objective function to be minimized by solving a single-objective problem. Through the solution of a number of optimization problems, with different weights each, the Pareto front of optimal solutions is computed. Two optimization approaches are employed taking the manufacturability of the final shape into consideration, giving rise to different optimal designs to be discussed and compared. Differences in the efficiency and the optimal shapes between the two approaches are thoroughly discussed and compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexias P, de Villiers E (2019) Gradient projection, constraints and surface regularization methods in adjoint shape optimization. Springer, Cham, pp 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson WK, Venkatakrishnan V (1999) Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation. Comput Fluids 28(4):443–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biancolini ME (2017) Fast radial basis functions for engineering applications. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brennen C (2005) Fundamentals of multiphase flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Byrde O, Sawley ML (1999) Optimization of a kenics static mixer for non-creeping flow conditions. Chem Eng J 72(2):163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cussler EL (2009) Values of diffusion coefficients. Cambridge series in chemical engineering, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 117–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew DA (1983) Mathematical modeling of two-phase flow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 15(1):261–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell PE, Maddison JR (2010) Conservative interpolation between volume meshes by local galerkin projection. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:89–100

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hanada T, Kuroda K, Takahashi K (2016) CFD geometrical optimization to improve mixing performance of axial mixer. Chem Eng Sci 144:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg S, Koubek R, Moser F, Schöck J (2009) An improvement of the sulzer smx\(^{{\rm TM}}\) static mixer significantly reducing the pressure drop. Chem Eng Res Des 87(4):524–532 (13th European Conference on Mixing: New developments towards more efficient and sustainable operations)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirt CW, Nichols BD (1981) Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39(1):201–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii M, Hibiki T (2011) Thermo-fluid dynamics of two-phase flow. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson A (1988) Aerodynamic design via control theory. J Sci Comput 3(3):233–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavvadias IS, Papoutsis-Kiachagias EM, Giannakoglou KC (2015) On the proper treatment of grid sensitivities in continuous adjoint methods for shape optimization. J Comput Phys 301:1–18

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Manninen M (1996) On the mixture model for multiphase flow. Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins JRRA, Sturdza P, Alonso JJ (2003) The complex-step derivative approximation. ACM Trans Math Softw 29(3):245–262

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nocedal J (2006) Numerical optimization. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Papoutsis-Kiachagias EM, Giannakoglou KC (2014) Continuous adjoint methods for turbulent flows, applied to shape and topology optimization: industrial applications. Arch Comput Methods Eng 23(2):255–299

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pironneau O (1984) Optimal shape design for elliptic systems. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rall L (1981) Automatic differentiation: techniques and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Regner M, Östergren K, Trägårdh C (2006) Effects of geometry and flow rate on secondary flow and the mixing process in static mixers—a numerical study. Chem Eng Sci 61(18):6133–6141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song H, Han SP (2005) A general correlation for pressure drop in a kenics static mixer. Chem Eng Sci 60(21):5696–5704

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Parts of this work have been conducted within the IODA project (http://ioda.sems.qmul.ac.uk), funded by the European Union HORIZON 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under Grant Agreement No. 642959.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavlos Alexias.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alexias, P., Giannakoglou, K.C. Optimization of a static mixing device using the continuous adjoint to a two-phase mixing model. Optim Eng 21, 631–650 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-019-09466-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-019-09466-x

Keywords

Navigation